Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/954,149

POWER CONVERSION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 20, 2024
Priority
Dec 26, 2023 — JP 2023-218861
Examiner
ROSARIO BENITEZ, GUSTAVO A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
618 granted / 760 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
787
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 760 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to the application filed on 11/20/2024. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/20/2024 has been considered by the examiner. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 10 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 line 23 “a connection destination” this should be “the connection destination”. Claim 10 line 2 “a voltage between” this should be “the voltage between”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 6 and 10-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu US 2025/0260313 in view of Kodera US 2021/0305908. Regarding Claim 1, Liu teaches (Figures 7 and 14-16) a power conversion device (1400) comprising: a plurality of terminals to which a single-phase AC power supply (grid) or a multi-phase AC power supply is connected as an external power supply; a power conversion circuit (rectifier) including multiple power semiconductor devices (Q switches), the multiple power semiconductor devices including a first pair of power semiconductor devices (Q1-Q2) and a second pair of power semiconductor devices (Qa1-Qa2), the first pair of power semiconductor devices corresponding to a specific phase of the multiple phases of the multi-phase AC power supply (positive phase), the second pair of power semiconductor devices corresponding to another phase different from the specific phase of the multiple phases (negative phase); a phase switching circuit (Qa3-Qa4) configured to switch a connection destination of the second pair of power semiconductor devices (Q3a and Q3b) between the specific phase and the other phase (positive and negative phases); and a control circuit (710 and 702) configured to control operations of the power conversion circuit and the phase switching circuit, the control being performed by, when the single-phase AC power supply is connected to the terminals (see fig. 14), turning on a predetermined power semiconductor device among the multiple power semiconductor devices (Q1, fig. 15a, T0), detecting a zero-crossing point at which a power supply voltage from the single-phase AC power supply zero-crosses in a state where the predetermined power semiconductor device is turned on (t1-t2, 15a), the zero-crossing point being detected based on a voltage between contact points of the phase switching circuit (Q3a-Q4a), and switching a connection destination (by turning on Q3a-Q4a) of the second pair of power semiconductor devices to the specific phase by operating the phase switching circuit (Q3a-Q4a)within a zero period following the zero-crossing point (at t2). (For Example: Par. 147-170) Liu does not teach a phase switching circuit including a relay circuit. Kodera teaches (Figure 2-3) a phase switching circuit (Qa3-Qa4) including a relay circuit. (For example: Par. 24-30) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the circuit of Liu to include a phase switching circuit including a relay circuit as taught by Kodera to provide inrush current protection and enable operation from different phases. Regarding Claim 2, Liu teaches (Figures 7 and 14-16) wherein the control circuit (710 and 702) is configured to turn on the predetermined power semiconductor device located on a high side among the multiple power semiconductor devices (Q1), the turning on being performed when the power supply voltage from the single-phase AC power supply is at a negative peak (see fig. 15a, before t0). (For Example: Par. 147-170) Regarding Claim 6, Liu teaches (Figures 7 and 14-16) wherein the control circuit is configured to turn on the predetermined power semiconductor device located on a low side (q2) among the multiple power semiconductor devices, the turning on being performed when the power supply voltage from the single-phase AC power supply is at a positive peak (after T9, Fig. 15a). (For Example: Par. 147-170 and 180-182) Regarding Claim 10, Liu teaches (Figures 7 and 14-16) wherein the zero period (t1-t2) is a period of time during which a voltage between contact points of the relay circuit is within a predetermined threshold range (operation range determined by the system) starting from the zero-crossing point (from 0 to -0.1). (For Example: Par. 147-170) Regarding Claim 11, Liu teaches (Figures 7 and 14-16) wherein the control circuit (710 and 702) is configured to, after the phase switching circuit (q3-q4) is operated in the zero period (fig. 15a, t2), turn off the predetermined power semiconductor device having been turned on (at t9), and start power conversion to convert AC power from the single-phase AC power supply into DC power after the predetermined power semiconductor device is turned off (normalized operation after t9). (For Example: Par. 147-170 an d180-182) Liu does not teach wherein the control circuit is configured to, after the relay circuit is operated in the zero period. Kodera teaches (Figure 2-3 and 5) wherein the control circuit (11) is configured to, after the relay circuit is operated in the zero period (fig. 5, t6). (For example: Par. 24-30) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the circuit of Liu to include wherein the control circuit is configured to, after the relay circuit is operated in the zero period, as taught by Kodera to provide inrush current protection and enable operation from different phases. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3-5 and 7-9 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Reasons for Indicating Allowable Subject Matter The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for indicating Allowable Subject Matter: Claim 3; prior art of record fails to disclose either by itself or in combination: “…wherein the zero period is a period of time during which an increase amount of the power supply voltage from the single-phase AC power supply is positive after the predetermined power semiconductor device on the high side is turned on.” Claim 4; prior art of record fails to disclose either by itself or in combination: “…configured to turn off the predetermined power semiconductor device on the high side having been turned on, the turning off being performed when the power supply voltage from the single-phase AC power supply is at a positive peak immediately after the relay circuit is operated in the zero period. “ Claim 7; prior art of record fails to disclose either by itself or in combination: “…wherein the zero period is a period of time during which an increase amount of the power supply voltage from the single-phase AC power supply is negative after the predetermined power semiconductor device on the low side is turned on.” Claim 8; prior art of record fails to disclose either by itself or in combination: “…the control circuit is configured to turn off the predetermined power semiconductor device on the low side having been turned on, the turning off being performed when the power supply voltage from the single-phase AC power supply is at a negative peak immediately after the relay circuit is operated in the zero period. “ These features taken alone or in combination are neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art of record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GUSTAVO A ROSARIO-BENITEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-7888. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MONICA LEWIS can be reached at 5712721838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GUSTAVO A ROSARIO-BENITEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704867
LOW DROPOUT REGULATOR
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706522
ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY, ELECTRIC POWER CONVERSION DEVICE, AND INVERTER
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706539
FEEDBACK BASED ZERO CURRENT DETECTION CIRCUIT AND SYNCHRONOUS BOOST CONVERTER INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12689293
SINGLE INDUCTOR MULTIPLE OUTPUT REGULATOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683498
CONTROL CIRCUIT FOR A POWER CONVERTER WITH ADAPTIVE ERROR SIGNAL COMPENSATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.1%)
2y 7m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 760 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month