Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/954,588

ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC TIMEPIECE

Non-Final OA §103§112§Other
Filed
Nov 21, 2024
Priority
Nov 21, 2023 — JP 2023-197050
Examiner
TRAN, HAI V
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Casio Computer Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
840 granted / 1064 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
1081
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
52.3%
+12.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1064 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112 §Other
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Status of Application This Office Action is a response to Applicant’s communication (or preliminary’s amendment) filed on 11/21/2024. In virtue of this communication, claims 1-20 are currently presented in the instant application. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on 11/21/2024, 05/08/2025, 10/30/2025, 02/19/2026 and 06/02/2026 in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is considered by the examiner. If applicant is aware of any prior art or any other co-pending application not already of record, he/she is reminded of his/her duty under 37 CFR 1.97 to disclose the same. Priority Acknowledgement is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d). A certified copy of the priority documents received on 01/16/2025. Drawings The drawings submitted on 11/21/2024 are accepted as part of the formal application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Regarding claim 11, The recitation “the back-surface side of the spring-shaped section” in lines 1-2 is considered indefinite because it does not have an antecedent basis. Clarification is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 7, 11, 15 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tanaka et al (US 20060220957), hereinafter Tanaka. Regarding claim 1, Tanaka discloses an electronic device (an electronic wristwatch, Fig 2) comprising: a metal component (a rectangular terminal plate 28, Fig 6B) that is externally mounted to a case (a holder 17, Fig 6B); a metal plate (an electrode 19, Fig 6B) that is provided inside of a case back-surface side (Fig 6B) and functions as GND (paragraph [0057]); and an internal terminal plate (a terminal device 25, Fig 3) that is provided inside the case (Fig 3), wherein the internal terminal plate is sandwiched between the case and the metal plate (Fig 3). Tanaka does not explicitly teach the terminal device 25 (the internal terminal plate) causes the metal component to be connected to the metal plate. However, Tanaka teaches the terminal plate 28 to be connected to the electrode 19 (Fig 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use an internal terminal plate causing a metal component to be connected to a metal plate in Tanaka, in order to provide an antenna device that is easy to make, light in weight, and capable of receiving radio waves of a short wavelength with high sensitivity. [AltContent: textbox (Tanaka (US 20060220957))] PNG media_image1.png 438 628 media_image1.png Greyscale [AltContent: textbox (Tanaka (US 20060220957))] PNG media_image2.png 398 580 media_image2.png Greyscale [AltContent: textbox (Tanaka (US 20060220957))] PNG media_image3.png 361 540 media_image3.png Greyscale [AltContent: textbox (Tanaka (US 20060220957))] PNG media_image4.png 322 479 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 7, Tanaka as modified discloses the claimed invention, as discussed in claim 1. Tanaka does not explicitly teach the metal plate has a spring-shaped section at part or all of positions that correspond to the internal terminal plate. However, it is well known in the art that a metal plate has a spring-shaped section (Nesori, US 11120823, spring-shaped metal plate 38, Fig 3). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use a metal plate having a spring-shaped section at part or all of positions corresponding to an internal terminal plate in Tanaka as modified, in order to provide an antenna device that is easy to make, light in weight, and capable of receiving radio waves of a short wavelength with high sensitivity. Regarding claim 11, Tanaka as modified discloses the claimed invention, as discussed in claim 7. Tanaka does not explicitly teach an elastic body is disposed on the back-surface side of the spring-shaped section. However, it is well known in the art that an elastic body is disposed on a spring-shaped section of a metal plate. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use an elastic body being disposed on a back-surface side of a spring-shaped section in Tanaka as modified, in order to provide an antenna device that is easy to make, light in weight, and capable of receiving radio waves of a short wavelength with high sensitivity. Regarding claim 15, Tanaka as modified discloses the claimed invention, as discussed in claim 1. Tanaka teaches an antenna (an electrode 18, Fig 6B; paragraph [0055]) is provided within the case (Fig 6B). Regarding claim 20, Tanaka discloses an electronic timepiece (an electronic wristwatch, Fig 2) comprising: a metal component (a rectangular terminal plate 28, Fig 6B) that is externally mounted to a case (a holder 17, Fig 6B); a metal plate (an electrode 19, Fig 6B) that is provided inside of a case back-surface side (Fig 6B) and functions as GND (paragraph [0057]); and an internal terminal plate (a terminal device 25, Fig 3). Tanaka does not explicitly teach the terminal device 25 (the internal terminal plate) causes the metal component to be connected to the metal plate. However, Tanaka teaches the terminal plate 28 to be connected to the electrode 19 (Fig 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use an internal terminal plate causing a metal component to be connected to a metal plate in Tanaka, in order to provide an antenna device that is easy to make, light in weight, and capable of receiving radio waves of a short wavelength with high sensitivity. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6, 8-10, 12-14 and 16-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 2, prior art of record or most closely prior art fails to disclose, “wherein the internal terminal plate is formed in a substantial L shape in a side surface view and has a first site that is connected to the metal component, and a second site that is bent in a first direction from a lower end side of the first site, and a surface of the second site is in contact with a surface of the metal plate”. Dependent claims 3, 5-6, 8-9, 12-13, 16-17 and 19 are considered to be allowable by virtue of its/their dependency/dependencies on claim 2. Regarding claim 4, prior art of record or most closely prior art fails to disclose, “the case has a recess for disposing a waterproofer on a back surface-side end surface, and the internal terminal plate and the metal plate are disposed in a region that does not overlap with the recess”. Dependent claims 10, 14 and 18 are considered to be allowable by virtue of its/their dependency/dependencies on claim 4. Conclusion The Examiner has pointed out particular references contained in the prior art of record within the body of this action for the convenience of the Applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply. Applicant, in preparing the response, should consider fully the entire reference aspotentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of thepassage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAI TRAN whose telephone number is (571) 270-7650. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday 7:30 am-6:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dimary Lopez can be reached on (571) 270-7893. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAI V TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706371
ANTENNA GROUNDING
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706395
ANTENNA ARRAY ASSEMBLY
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700669
ADJUSTABLE ANTENNA ARRAY AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695181
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695182
RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICE AND BASE STATION ANTENNA
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+18.8%)
2y 7m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1064 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month