Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/954,699

RECYCLABLE PAPER WITH POLYMERIC BARRIER LAYER AND METHOD OF RECYCLING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 21, 2024
Priority
Apr 19, 2022 — continuation of 12/179,463
Examiner
RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL P
Art Unit
1712
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sonoco Development Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
493 granted / 673 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
695
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
73.1%
+33.1% vs TC avg
§102
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 673 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 21 November 2024, 12 September 2025, and 23 March 2026 have been considered by the examiner. Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because at Line 4, the sentence “The recyclable structure 85% by subjecting the structure to …” is incomplete. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 1. Claims 17 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or (a)(2) as being anticipated by US 2022/0112663 to Boswell et al., (“Boswell”). With regard to Claim 17, Boswell teaches a method of providing a recyclable packaging material comprising applying adhesive to a paper layer and applying a polymeric coating thereon (see Abstract; FIG. 3; ¶¶ [0008], [0069], [0149]). With regard to Claim 19, Boswell teaches spraying and/or extruding layers (see ¶ [0414]). With regard to Claim 20, Boswell teaches recycling produced materials wherein nearly all paper cellulose fibers are recovered (see ¶¶ [0464], [0518]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-16 are allowed. Claim 18 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Boswell is deemed to be the closest prior art; however the reference does not teach or suggest applying an adhesive layer in a thickness sufficient to prevent the coated polymer layer from encapsulating exposed fibers of the fiber-based substrate, and fracturing of layers as claimed when exposed to mechanical stress during recycling, per Claims 1 and 12. Similarly, Boswell does not teach or suggest the feature of Claim 18 wherein mechanical stress causes adhesive layer fracture such into first and second portions of the claimed relative size. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael P Rodriguez whose telephone number is (571)270-3736. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 - 6:00 Eastern M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Cleveland can be reached at 571-272-1418. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Michael P. Rodriguez/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1712
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12668603
FUNCTIONALIZED ORGANOTIN PRECURSORS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661688
ACOUSTIC PANEL EDGE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661689
METHOD FOR FORMING MULTILAYER FILM AND MULTILAYER FILM
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654382
PROCESS FOR MAKING A NON-FIBROUS WATER SOLUBLE PRODUCT
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12628911
FUNCTION SCREEN PRINTING ON UPPER
1y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.3%)
2y 8m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 673 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month