Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/955,159

MOTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 21, 2024
Priority
Dec 05, 2023 — JP 2023-205238
Examiner
MOK, ALEX W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
845 granted / 1139 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1168
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
90.4%
+50.4% vs TC avg
§102
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1139 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chamberlin et al. (US Patent Application Pub. No.: US 2014/0246177 A1). For claim 1, Chamberlin et al. disclose the claimed invention comprising: a cylindrical housing (reference numeral 72, figures 11, 12) that accommodates a stator (reference numeral 44) and a rotor (reference numeral 42, see figures 17, 18) inside; and a first cover (reference numeral 158, see figures 11-14, 17, 18) that blocks an opening of the housing (i.e. first cover 158 covering one axial side of housing 72, see figures 11, 12, 17, 18), wherein the housing is provided with a refrigerant flow path (reference numerals 78, 96, see figures 13, 14), and wherein each of an upper portion and a lower portion of the first cover (i.e. upper portion of first cover 158 having first hole 56, lower portion of first cover 158 having first hole 154, see figure 14) is provided with a first hole (reference numerals 56, 154) through which an inside and an outside of the refrigerant flow path communicate with each other (see figures 13-18). For claim 6, Chamberlin et al. disclose the housing having a first opening and a second opening (i.e. first and second axial end of housing 72, figures 11, 12), wherein the first cover (reference numeral 158) blocks the first opening (i.e. first cover 158 covering one axial side of housing 72, see figures 11, 12, 17, 18), and wherein the motor includes a second cover (reference numeral 60) that blocks the second opening of the housing (i.e. second cover 60 covering the other axial side of housing 72, see figures 11, 12, 17, 18). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-5 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chamberlin et al. as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Uchiumi (Japanese Patent Document No.: JP 11341744 A). For claim 2, Chamberlin et al. disclose the claimed invention except for one of the housing and the first cover being provided with a second hole through which the inside and the outside of the refrigerant flow path communicate with each other. Providing a second hole for the cover is a known skill as exhibited by Uchiumi which discloses multiple holes (reference numerals 24a, 24b, 24c) on the end surface (see figure 6), which when applied to the first cover of Chamberlin et al. would disclose the first cover being provided with a second hole through which the inside and the outside of the refrigerant flow path communicate with each other. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the second hole as disclosed by Uchiumi for the first cover of Chamberlin et al. for predictably providing desirable configurations for facilitating optimal cooling characteristics for the device. For claim 3, Chamberlin et al. in view of Uchiumi disclose the claimed invention except for the second hole being provided in the first cover. Uchiumi further discloses the second hole (i.e. multiple holes 24a, 24b, 24c) being disposed on the side surface (see figure 6), which when applied to the first cover of Uchiumi would disclose the second hole being provided in the first cover. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the second hole as disclosed by Uchiumi for the first cover of Chamberlin et al. in view of Uchiumi for predictably providing desirable configurations for facilitating optimal cooling characteristics for the device. For claim 4, Chamberlin et al. in view of Uchiumi disclose the claimed invention except for the second hole being located between the two first holes in an up-and-down direction. Having a second hole located in between two holes is a known skill as exhibited by Uchiumi (i.e. hole 24c is located between two holes 24a, 24b as shown in figure 6), which when applied to the second hole of Chamberlin et al. in view of Uchiumi would disclose the second hole being located between the two first holes in an up-and-down direction. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the second hole as disclosed by Uchiumi in between the two first holes of Chamberlin et al. in view of Uchiumi for predictably providing desirable configurations for facilitating optimal cooling characteristics for the device. For claim 5, Chamberlin et al. disclose the claimed invention except for a bolt that fixes a component to the first cover blocking the first hole. Having a bolt to block the first hole is a known skill as exhibited by Uchiumi (reference numeral 24, see figure 6), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the bolt as disclosed by Uchiumi for the first hole of Chamberlin et al. for predictably controlling the flow of the coolant within the device. For claim 8, Chamberlin et al. in view of Uchiumi disclose the claimed invention except for the first hole being smaller in diameter than the second hole. Uchiumi further discloses holes (reference numerals 24a, 24b, 24c) having different diameters (i.e. hole 24a having a smaller diameter than hole 24c, see figure 6), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a smaller diameter for the hole as disclosed by Uchiumi so that the first hole is smaller in diameter than the second hole for Chamberlin et al. in view of Uchiumi for predictably providing desirable configuration for controlling the flow of the coolant within the device. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chamberlin et al. as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Scharlach (US Patent No.: 10770949). For claim 7, Chamberlin et al. disclose the claimed invention except for the two first holes being located to interpose an axial line of the housing between the two first holes. Having the holes located to interpose an axial line between the holes is a known skill as exhibited by Scharlach which discloses holes (reference numerals 12, 13) and the axial line (i.e. along center of shaft 6, see figure 1) in between holes (reference numerals 12, 13, see figure 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the axial line in between the holes as disclosed by Scharlach for the two first holes of Chamberlin et al. for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the cooling flow of the device. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following references disclose embodiments of housing/cooling configurations: US 11670981 B2 (Sung; Wonjung et al.), US 9762106 B2 (Gauthier; Jean-Philippe et al.), US 6087744 A (Glauning; Juergen), US 20160164377 A1 (Gauthier; Jean-Philippe et al.), US 20160099633 A1 (YOSHINORI; Manabu et al.), US 20080024020 A1 (Iund; Trevor N. et al.), WO 2023079719 A1 (GOTO HIDEAKI et al.). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX W MOK whose telephone number is (571)272-9084. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Seye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX W MOK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683463
WIND TURBINE GENERATOR ROTOR ARRANGEMENT
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676519
ROTOR CORE, ROTOR, AND ROTATING ELECTRICAL MACHINE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671288
ROTOR STRUCTURE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671278
STATOR CORE, STATOR, ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING STATOR CORE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671284
ELECTRIC MOTOR HAVING ADJUSTABLE MAGNETIC FIELD, AND VEHICLE
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+20.8%)
2y 8m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1139 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month