Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/955,249

Clamping Ring for a Fitting and Fitting with a Clamping Ring

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 21, 2024
Priority
Nov 22, 2023 — DE 10 2023 132 504.3
Examiner
WILSON, LEE D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Viega Technology GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1488 granted / 1860 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1883
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§102
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§112
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1860 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The following claims are vague, indefinite, awkwardly, confusingly worded and/or lacking proper antecedent basis: “designed” in claims 1, 6-8, and 10. The terms is narrative because all inventions parts and elements are designed. The term does not add anything because what is the part and how is the part configured. This is indefinite. “preferably” in claim 6. This term does not definitely recite the limitation. This term is vague and indefinite. “if necessary” in claim 6. This term does not definitely recite the limitation. This term is vague and indefinite. “preferably, optionally,” in claim 11. This term does not definitely recite the limitation. This term is vague and indefinite. Optionally allows the limitation to be read out of the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Morano III et al 11629804. Morano III et al disclose the claimed invention as recited in the claims as shown below: A clamping ring for a fitting for a connection with a pipe (workpiece in Background/summary Col. 1, line 10), - with a plurality of ring elements 1000 &2000, - wherein the ring elements are designed to hold and/or fix a pipe to be inserted, wherein - at least one ring element is designed as an inhibiting element 3000 with a radially inwardly directed cam 3000, - the cam is elastically (see material elastic Col. 9, lines 20-22 )deformable outwards in the radial direction, and - the cam has a radially inwardly directed curved surface. PNG media_image1.png 699 788 media_image1.png Greyscale The clamping ring according to claim 1, wherein - the cam is inclined at an angle of less than 90° to the axis of the pipe to be inserted in the direction of insertion of the pipe. See Fig.6 PNG media_image1.png 699 788 media_image1.png Greyscale 3. The clamping ring according to claim 1, wherein - at least three inhibiting elements with cams are provided and - the cams form a diameter smaller than the outer diameter of the pipe to be inserted on the radially inward side. See Fig.6 PNG media_image1.png 699 788 media_image1.png Greyscale The clamping ring according to claim 1, wherein - in that a plurality of hinge elements 4000 is provided for pivotably connecting two ring elements in each case, - in that the ring elements have a strip shape by means of the hinge elements, and the ring elements can assume a flat shape or a laterally open ring shape. PNG media_image2.png 806 810 media_image2.png Greyscale 5.The clamping ring according to claim 1, wherein - the ring elements are formed in one piece as a ring open on one side. Once the clamp is closed it forms one piece 6.The clamping ring according to claim 1, wherein - the ring elements are partially designed as holding elements and - the holding elements have radially inwardly directed, preferably elastically designed guiding elements for centering and, if necessary, holding a pipe to be inserted. See Fig.6 7.The clamping ring according to claim 1, wherein - the ring elements are partially designed as fixing elements and - the fixing elements each have at least one cutting element 7000 & 8000 for fixing a pipe to be inserted. PNG media_image3.png 954 894 media_image3.png Greyscale 8.The clamping ring according to claim 1, wherein - a part of the ring elements are designed as holding elements and/or a part of the ring elements are designed as fixing elements and/or a part of the ring elements are designed as inhibiting elements. See Fig.6 9.A fitting for a connection with a pipe (workpiece in Background/summary Col. 1, line 10), - with a base body 400, - with a stop element 5000 formed in the base body on the circumference and projecting inwards, - with a pressing sleeve 6000 connected to the base body, the pressing sleeve having a chamber inside area of pressing sleeve directed inwards towards the pipe to be received, - with a clamping ring arranged in the chamber, the clamping ring consisting of a plastic and having a plurality of ring elements, and - with a sealing element, - wherein the pressing sleeve is suitable for sealing the pipe to be connected together with the clamping ring and the sealing element, wherein - that the clamping ring is designed according to claim 1. PNG media_image4.png 806 810 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image1.png 699 788 media_image1.png Greyscale 10. A system for connecting a fitting to a pipe (workpiece in Background/summary Col. 1, line 10), - wherein the fitting is designed according to claim 9, - wherein the amount of the pull-out force is greater than the amount of the push-in force for pushing the pipe into the fitting. 11.The system according to claim 10, wherein - the amount of the pull-out force is preferably at least 20%, optionally at least 50%, preferably at least 80% and in particular at least 100% greater than the push- in force. These are all optional metric that can or cannot be selected. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by DE 10 2022 116 679 A1 2024. 01.11 (Admitted Prior Art) . The German patent has a filed date 5/7/2022 that is before 11/22/2023 DE 10 2022 116 679 A1 2024. 01.11 (Admitted Prior Art) disclose the claimed invention as recited in the claims as shown by this reference which is the same as the applicant invention since it is a prior reference of the applicant which is prior art against the invention due to dates. All of the claims are anticipated by this reference along with the drawings being the same. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The 892 form discloses prior art being made of record. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEE D WILSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4499. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 6;30-4;30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRIAN KELLER can be reached at 571-272-8548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LEE D. WILSON Examiner Art Unit 3723 Ldw /LEE D WILSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723 September 13, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746608
CLAMP FOR KEY CUTTING MACHINE
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745878
MULTIFUNCTIONAL CUTTING BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741348
SYSTEM FOR MACHINING WORKPIECES, MACHINE TOOL, SUPPORT DEVICE AND WORKPIECE SUPPORT
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734619
WELDING CLAMP
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734624
HOLDER PLATE FOR NEGATIVE PRESSURE CHUCKING, HOLDER DEVICE FOR NEGATIVE PRESSURE CHUCKING, AND DE-BONDING STATION
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.8%)
2y 9m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1860 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month