Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/955,658

ARRAY MICROPHONE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 21, 2024
Priority
Dec 06, 2023 — JP 2023-206253
Examiner
PAUL, DISLER
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1222 granted / 1486 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1504
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§103
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1486 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 3-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (A) (1) as being anticipated by Graham et al. (US 11,743,639 B2). Claim 1, Graham et al. disclosed of an array microphone device to be disposed at an opening portion of a system ceiling instead of a first ceiling panel, the first ceiling panel being disposed at the opening portion of a grid body in the system ceiling (fig.2F2I; col.10 line 25-60/the grid/gap allow the system ceiling to be separate and may be drop to that of the ceiling panel); , the array microphone device comprising: a device main body that houses an array microphone (fig.2G (116); col 9 line 50-60/the array may be a standalone unit); and a frame that is fixed to the device main body and is disposed at the opening portion, wherein the frame disposed at the opening portion supports the device main body by retracting a main body front surface of the device main body upward in a vertical direction relative to a panel front surface of a second ceiling panel in the system ceiling (fig.2E (260); col.10 line 15-25), the panel front surface being a surface on a lower side in the vertical direction, the second ceiling panel being disposed at another opening portion of the system ceiling (fig.2E (260); col.10 line 15-25). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Graham et al. (US 11,743,639 B2) Claim 2, the array microphone device according to claim 1, wherein the frame is assembled by connecting four brackets having a same width and a same length to each other in a manner of corresponding to respective sides of a certain dimensional frame forming an outer shape of the device main body (fig.2F (264); col.10 line 15-40) Nonetheless , Graham et al. never limit such frame to being of a rectangular configuration. However, one of the ordinary skills in the art could have varied the provided configuration frame as mentioned to any other desired dimensions including such specific rectangular frame for achieving the same result as to secure the frame to the ceiling panel accordingly. . Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DISLER PAUL whose telephone number is (571)270-1187. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00-6:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chin, Vivian can be reached at (571) 272-7848. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DISLER PAUL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2695
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Sep 11, 2026
Interview Requested
Sep 18, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 18, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745030
AUDIO RELAY ACROSS MULTIPLE DEVICES
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735314
DIFFERENTIAL DRIVE OF A SOUND TRANSDUCER SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731618
Audio Caching for Synchronous Playback
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732746
SOUND SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732733
Method and System of Static Charge Variation Sensing Based Human Jaw Motion Detection for User Voice
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+8.6%)
2y 9m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1486 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month