Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/955,866

AERO SHUTTER FOR A VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 21, 2024
Priority
Nov 22, 2023 — EU 23211349.8
Examiner
LE, HUAN G
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Wuhan Lotus Cars Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
729 granted / 824 resolved
+28.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
834
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
43.2%
+3.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 824 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED CORRESPONDENCE This is the first Office Action on the merits of Application 18/955,866 filed on 11/21/24. Claims 1-14 are pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/21/24 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 & 5-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by KR 20140032620 to Yoon (applicant cited reference). Claim 1 Yoon discloses in Figs 1-4, An aero shutter for a vehicle, comprising: at least one opening (e.g. see area within 30) through which air can flow; and a plurality of flaps (e.g. 40) that are distributed along a circumference of the opening (e.g. along 30), each flap being rotatable about a pivot joint (e.g. 22, 32, 42 or 44) between a closed state (Fig. 3a) in which the flap covers a section of the opening and an opened state (Fig. 3b) in which the flap does not cover the opening or covers the opening to a lesser extent compared to the closed state. Claim 2 The aero shutter of claim 1, wherein the flaps are configured to jointly cover the entire opening when each flap assumes its closed state (see Fig 3a). Claim 3 The aero shutter of claim 1, wherein the flaps are coupled to a common movement mechanism (e.g. 50, 52 & 34) configured to simultaneously rotate the flaps about their pivot joints. Claim 5 The aero shutter of claim 1, wherein a rotation axis (e.g. each pivot rotates about axis parallel to 30) of each pivot joint extends at an angle (e.g. evenly positioned along circumference) to an area of the opening. Claim 6 The aero shutter of claim 1, wherein the aero shutter comprises a first member (e.g. 20) and a second member (e.g. 30) that are movable relative to one another, wherein each flap is connected to the first member via the pivot joint and each flap is coupled to the second member, and wherein during the relative movement of the first member and second member, each flap is rotatable about the pivot joint to move between the opened state and the closed state (see Fig 6). Claim 7 The aero shutter of claim 6, wherein the second member is rotatable about a rotation axis that extends at an angle to the opening (see Fig 4, axis concentric with opening and located on the circumference of opening). Claim 8 The aero shutter of claim 6, wherein the second member extends along at least a section of the opening’s circumference (see Fig 4, extends along opening’s circumference). Claim 9 The aero shutter of claim 6, wherein the second member is ring-shaped and/or comprises cylindrical section (see Figs 3a, 3b & 4). Claim 10 The aero shutter of claim 6, wherein the first member is immovable (e.g. fixed ring, paragraph 20 of translated document). Claim 11 The aero shutter of claim 6, wherein the coupling between each flap and the second member includes a rotational degree of freedom (e.g. 32 & 44 are pivot joints) and/or a linear degree of freedom. Claim 12 The aero shutter of claim 1, wherein the flaps are flat (see Fig 4). Claim 13 The aero shutter of claim 1, wherein the flaps are convexly curved relative to the opening (see Figs 3a & 4 for convex curve shapes). Claim 14 The aero shutter of claim 1, wherein the flaps comprise at least a first flap and a second flap (e.g. 40, 2 of 8 flaps), the first flap having a first edge facing a second edge of the second flap, wherein the first edge and the second edge are complementary curved (Fig 3 shows one curved edge of a flap complementing another flaps curved edge in order to cover the opening). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUAN LE whose telephone number is (571)270-3122. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday 9:00am - 5:00pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob Scott can be reached on 571-270-3415. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUAN LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746804
ARRANGEMENT FOR A VEHICLE ROOF AND VEHICLE ROOF
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734872
Support Device for Vehicular Battery Pack and Electric Truck
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736123
DRIVE SYSTEM AND DRIVE TRANSMISSION
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734873
PROTECTION DEVICE FOR AN ELECTRICAL ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM OF A VEHICLE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731847
BATTERY PACK
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 0m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 824 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month