Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/956,481

IMAGE CODING METHOD AND IMAGE CODING APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 22, 2024
Priority
Feb 03, 2012 — provisional 61/594,718 +10 more
Examiner
LE, PETER D
Art Unit
2488
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sun Patent Trust
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
495 granted / 617 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
654
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
88.3%
+48.3% vs TC avg
§102
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§112
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 617 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions The amendments to the claims, filed on 03/10/2026, have been entered and made of record. Claims 1-3 are pending with claim 2 being amended and claim 3 being newly added. Response to Arguments Arguments presented in the Remarks (“Remarks") filed on 03/10/2026 have been fully considered, but are rendered moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection necessitated by amendment(s) initiated by the applicant(s). Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 03/10/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of U.S Patent Nos. 12192506; 11812048; 10334268; 10034015; and 9883201 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for a patent. (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States. Claim 2 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Suzuki (“Suzuki”) [U.S Patent Application Pub. 2005/0152452 A1] Regarding claim 2, Suzuki meets the claim limitations as follows: A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a bitstream [para. 0104: ‘a storage medium (recording medium) on which the coded bitstream created by the software encoder’], the bitstream including a temporal motion vector prediction flag [para. 0104: slice header information 3010 including direct/alternative mode selection information’], and the bitstream [Note: the bitstream is pure data not considered as processor instructions causing a decoding apparatus to perform decoding operations] causing a decoding apparatus to perform decoding operations [The claim is basically directed to a memory storing data or bitstream (i.e. video or music) and the body of the claim is reciting how the bitstream as input to a decoding apparatus cause decoding function. How the bitstream was generated/fed to a decoding apparatus and the content of the bitstream are both not given patentable weight as prescribed in both MPEP 2113 and 2111.05(III). Therefore, the claim scope is just a storage medium storing data and is anticipated by a reference which recites a storage medium storing a bitstream], comprising: obtaining the temporal motion vector prediction flag indicating whether or not temporal motion vector prediction is to be performed on a first picture; determining, using the obtained temporal motion vector prediction flag, whether or not the temporal motion vector prediction is to be performed on the first picture, the temporal motion vector prediction using a temporal motion vector predictor derived from a motion vector of a co-located reference picture; when the determining determines that the temporal motion vector prediction is to be performed on the first picture, creating a first list of motion vector predictors that includes at least one temporal motion vector predictor derived from the motion vector of the co-located reference picture; and when the determining determines that the temporal motion vector prediction is not to be performed on the first picture, (i) creating a second list of motion vector predictors that does not include the temporal motion vector predictor derived from the motion vector of the co-located reference picture, (ii) obtaining a parameter from a bitstream, the parameter indicating a motion vector predictor included in the second list, (iii) decoding the first picture using the motion vector predictor indicated by the parameter, and (iv) decoding a second picture following the first picture in decoding order by using the temporal motion vector prediction using the temporal motion vector predictor derived from a motion vector of the first picture and without using the motion vector of the co-located reference picture preceding the first picture, wherein a number of the motion vector predictors included in the first list and a number of the motion vector predictors included in the second list are same. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 3 are allowed. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER D LE whose telephone number is (571)270-5382. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Alternate Friday: 10AM-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, SATH PERUNGAVOOR can be reached on 571-272-7455. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER D LE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2488
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 10, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635885
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMAGE REORIENTATION FOR ENDOSCOPIC IMAGING
5y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634516
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODING USING INTRA PREDICTION BASED ON SUBBLOCK PARTITIONING
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634532
SECURE DECODER AND SECURE DECODING METHODS
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627802
DATA ENCODING AND DECODING METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12582306
SCANNER FOR DENTAL TREATMENT, AND DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD OF SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+16.8%)
2y 7m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 617 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month