Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/957,204

REMOVABLE MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 22, 2024
Priority
Nov 30, 2021 — divisional of 12/179,625
Examiner
KANDAS, NICHOLAS R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Livewire Ev LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
99 granted / 117 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
136
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
89.1%
+49.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 117 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on 1/15/2025 has been fully considered. Priority The priority claim to 17/538,228 filed on 11/30/2021 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luke (US 20130090795 A1) in view of Singhal (US 20200254898 A1). Regarding claim 1, Luke teaches a removable module (taught by paragraph 37 “The electrical energy storage devices 118 may, for instance, be sized to physically fit, and electrically power, personal transportation vehicles, such as all-electric scooters or motorbikes 100, and may be portable to allow easy replacement or exchange”) comprising: a multipurpose connector (122a and 122b “a number of electrical terminals” taught in figure 1) configured to: connect the removable module to a motor when the removable module is attached to a vehicle (taught by paragraph 40 “In particular, Fig. 2 shows an embodiment which employs the electrical energy storage device 118 to supply power to the traction electric motor 116”), and connect the removable module to electric vehicle supply equipment when the removable module is detached from the vehicle (taught by paragraph 38 “allowing a charge to be delivered to the electrical energy storage device 118 for charging or recharging the same”); and dual-purpose circuitry (120 “control circuit” taught by figure 1) configured to: receive electric power from the electric vehicle supply equipment when the multipurpose connector connects the removable module to the electric vehicle supply equipment (taught by paragraph 38 “allowing a charge to be delivered to the electrical energy storage device 118 for charging or recharging the same”), and output electric energy to the motor when the multipurpose connector connects the removable module to the motor (taught by paragraph 40 “In particular, Fig. 2 shows an embodiment which employs the electrical energy storage device 118 to supply power to the traction electric motor 116”). However, the dual-purpose circuitry of Luke is not taught as part of the removable module (see figure 1). Singhal teaches wherein the dual purpose circuitry is part of the removeable module (taught by paragraph 236 "Each individual battery module has a circuit board with three outward facing electrical connectors; one electrical connector is for discharging the module for powering the electric motor, a second electrical connector is used for charging the module and a third electrical connector is used for providing visible health indicator lights on the module itself"). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the circuitry of Luke so that the dual-purpose circuitry is incorporated in the removable module as taught by Singhal, with a reasonable expectation of success. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification because the circuitry being incorporated on each removable module enables charging to be managed when the module is removed from the motor vehicle. Regarding claim 2, Luke in view of Singhal teaches the removable module according to claim 1, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. Luke also teaches combinational circuitry configured to: output an auxiliary voltage to an auxiliary load when the combinational circuitry converts DC current into the auxiliary voltage (taught by paragraph 43 “the first DC/DC power converter 206a may step up a voltage of electrical power from the electrical energy storage device 118 to a level sufficient to drive the traction electric motor 116”). Regarding claim 3, Luke in view of Singhal teaches the removable module according to claim 2, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. Luke also teaches wherein the dual-purpose circuitry is configured to convert the electric power into the DC current (taught by paragraph 43 “the first DC/DC power converter 206a may step up a voltage of electrical power from the electrical energy storage device 118 to a level sufficient to drive the traction electric motor 116”). Regarding claim 4, Luke in view of Singhal teaches the removable module according to claim 2, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. Luke also teaches wherein the combinational circuitry is configured to output DC energy to an energy storage device when the combinational circuitry converts the DC current into the DC energy (taught by paragraph 47 “the second DC/DC power converter 206d may step down a voltage of the electrical power generated by the traction electric motor 116 to a level suitable for the electrical energy storage device 118” ). Regarding claim 5, Luke in view of Singhal teaches the removable module according to claim 4, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. Luke also teaches wherein the dual-purpose circuitry is configured to convert a DC voltage into the electric energy when the dual-purpose circuitry receives the DC voltage from the energy storage device (taught by paragraph 44 “the control circuit 120 may include a DC/AC power converter 206b, commonly referred to as an inverter, that, in the drive mode or configuration, couples the electrical energy storage device 118 to supply power, via the first DC/DC power converter 206a, to the traction electric motor 116”). Regarding claim 6, Luke in view of Singhal teaches the removable module according to claim 5, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. Luke also teaches wherein the energy storage device is configured to store the DC energy as the DC voltage (taught by paragraph 38 “the electrical terminals 122 allow a charge to be delivered from the electrical storage device 118”). Regarding claim 7, Luke in view of Singhal teaches the removable module according to claim 5, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. Luke also teaches wherein the combinational circuitry is configured to output the auxiliary voltage to the auxiliary load when the combinational circuitry converts the DC voltage into the DC energy (taught by paragraph 43 “The first DC/DC power converter 206a may step up a voltage of electrical power from the electrical energy storage device 118 to a level sufficient to drive the traction electric motor 116”). Claim(s) 8-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luke (US 20130090795 A1) in view of Singhal (US 20200254898 A1) and in further view of Graßl (US 20210387536 A1). Regarding claim 8, Luke in view of Singhal teaches the removable module according to claim 1, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. However, Luke does not teach sensing circuitry configured to: detect that the removable module is connected to the electric vehicle supply equipment when the multipurpose connector connects the removable module to the electric vehicle supply equipment. Graßl teaches sensing circuitry configured to: detect that the removable module is connected to the electric vehicle supply equipment when the multipurpose connector connects the removable module to the electric vehicle supply equipment (27 "sensor" taught in figure 2 and paragraph 34 "at least one sensor 27 and/or at least one device for voltage or current measurement can be used to monitor the temperature of the charging module 10 or alternatively of its electronics 22, input voltages and/or currents, output voltages and/or currents, frequencies of an alternating input current and the like, and to control or alternatively regulate the output voltage or alternatively the charging current as a function of these operating parameters"). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have incorporated the sensor of Graßl into the control circuit of Luke, with a reasonable expectation of success. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this incorporation because by detecting whether or not the removable module is connected to the electric vehicle supply equipment, the removable module can inform the user as to whether or not it is charging. Regarding claim 9, Luke in view of Singhal and in further view of Graßl teaches the removable module according to claim 8, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. Luke does not teach wherein the sensing circuitry is configured to detect that the removable module is connected to the motor when the multipurpose connector connects the removable module to the motor. Graßl teaches wherein the sensing circuitry is configured to detect that the removable module is connected to the motor when the multipurpose connector connects the removable module to the motor (27 "a housing sensor" taught by figure 2, paragraph 20 "a respective housing sensor, wherein the control device is configured to detect by means of the housing sensor whether the respective charging module is reported in the housing, and, as a function thereof, to adjust the output voltage and/or the charging current and/or a further operating parameter of the charging module. The housing sensor can be formed, for example, by a sensing device or by two contact surfaces which become conductively connected by the housing," and paragraph 40 "It is therefore possible that the sensor 27 or one of the sensors 27 is a housing sensor 27, for example, a pressure sensing device or the like, by means of which it is detected when the charging module 10 is installed in the housing 2"). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have incorporated the housing sensor of Graßl into the control circuit of Luke, with a reasonable expectation of success. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this incorporation because by detecting whether or not the removable module is connected to the motor, the removable module can inform the user as to whether or not the vehicle is receiving power. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS KANDAS whose telephone number is (571)272-5628. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James A Shriver can be reached at (303)297-4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICHOLAS R. KANDAS/Examiner, Art Unit 3613 /JAMES A SHRIVER II/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679461
VEHICLE BODY REINFORCING STRUCTURE AND VEHICLE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676377
Structural battery pack cell signal and conversion pass-through
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673548
RADIAL WHEEL MOTOR SUPPORTED ON AUXILIARY BEARINGS IN A PARALLEL ARRANGEMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12649361
ACTIVE AIR FLAP DEVICE FOR VEHICLE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12636961
ELECTRIC-POWERED DEVICE AND INSTALLATION SEAT THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.9%)
2y 8m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 117 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month