Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/957,315

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING HARQ-ACK INFORMATION

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Nov 22, 2024
Priority
Nov 02, 2018 — provisional 62/755,407 +2 more
Examiner
YOUNG, STEVE R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
399 granted / 593 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
625
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
65.1%
+25.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 593 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim 1 is pending. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 6 and 1 of U.S. Patent No. 11,296,849 and 12,294,549, respectively. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the instant claim is merely a slightly broader version of the ‘849 and ‘549 claims and the differences are not patentably distinct: Claim 1 ‘849 Claims 1 & 6 ‘549 Claim 1 A processor for wireless communication, comprising: at least one controller coupled with at least one memory and configured to cause the processor to: receive a configuration of a set of subslots within a slot, each of one or more subslots of the set of subslots comprising a time interval within the slot; …receiving configuration information of one or more subslots within the slot, where each of the one or more subslots comprises a time interval within the slot… receive a configuration of a plurality of subslots of a slot; receive an indication of a first physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resource for transmitting hybrid automatic repeat request-acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) information during the slot, …determining, at the user equipment, a first physical uplink control channel resource assigned for Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request-Acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) information in a slot where one or more physical uplink control channels are scheduled to be transmitted;… determine a first physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resource that is within the slot and is allocated for a first PUCCH transmission associated with Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request-Acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) information during the slot, the first PUCCH resource overlapping in time with at least one uplink channel resource scheduled for transmission during the slot, …(Claim 6) identifying a physical uplink shared channel resource that overlaps with the second physical uplink control channel resource in time… the first PUCCH resource overlapping with at least one second PUCCH resource within the slot for a second PUCCH transmission during the slot, the indication indicating that transmission of the HARQ-ACK information ends within a subslot of the set of subslots, and a last symbol of the first PUCCH resource being within the subslot; and determining the time instance as an end of a subslot of the one or more subslots, wherein a last symbol of the first physical uplink control channel resource is within the subslot, wherein the method further comprises receiving an indication that indicates transmission of the HARQ-ACK information ends within the subslot wherein the first PUCCH transmission associated with the HARQ-ACK information ends during a subslot of the plurality of subslots, the subslot of the plurality of subslots assigned for a respective instance of HARQ-ACK feedback, andwherein a last symbol of the first PUCCH resource is within the subslot; multiplex the HARQ-ACK information on a second PUCCH resource, the second PUCCH resource being in the subslot of the set of subslots within the slot. …determining a second physical uplink control channel resource for transmitting the HARQ-ACK information from the group of physical uplink control channel resources; and transmitting the HARQ-ACK information based on the second physical uplink control channel resource… select a third PUCCH resource within the subslot based on the first PUCCH transmission associated with the HARQ-ACK information ending during the subslot of the plurality of subslots and a last symbol of the third PUCCH resource being within the subslot; and multiplex the HARQ-ACK information with the second PUCCH transmission on the third PUCCH resource. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hosseini et al. (US# 2020/0145144 – which teaches of handling overlapping PUCCH/HARQ-ACK resources), Nemeth et al. (US# 2020/0106586 – which teaches of indicating number of sub-slot boundaries). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Steve R Young whose telephone number is (571)270-7518. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag G Shah can be reached at (571) 272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVE R YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750176
METHOD FOR DETERMINING REFERENCE SIGNAL OR REFERENCE SIGNAL RESOURCE OR REFERENCE SIGNAL RESOURCE SET, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND MEDIUM
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745244
FLEXIBLE UPLINK CONTROL INFORMATION (UCI) TRANSMISSION WITH PHYSICAL UPLINK SHARED CHANNEL (PUSCH)
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12726974
CROSS-CARRIER DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD, TERMINAL, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12672128
COMMUNICATION OF ASYNCHRONOUS ULTRA-LOW LATENCY TRANSMISSIONS WITHIN A SYNCHRONIZED TRANSMISSION OPPORTUNITY (S-TXOP)
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666459
TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+19.5%)
3y 3m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 593 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month