Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/957,482

INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 22, 2024
Priority
Nov 28, 2023 — JP 2023-201023
Examiner
DULANEY, BENJAMIN O
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
356 granted / 573 resolved
+2.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
604
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
86.5%
+46.5% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 573 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement IDS filed 11/22/24 is acknowledged, the references therein relating to the general background of applicant’s invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim currently states “color obtained by converting the first color is the first color”, however it is unclear how a color in a first color gamut could possibly be converted into a second gamut and still be the same color defined as “the first color”. Additional explanation and/or amendment is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19, 21 and 22 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claims 1, 21 and 22, the prior art does not contain a valid combination of references that disclose an information processing apparatus that obtains first color information from an image that includes a pixel representing color information of a first color defined in a first color gamut and a pixel representing color information of a second color defined in the first color gamut, sets second color information, executes color conversion for converting the first color into a third color defined in a second color gamut and converting the second color into a fourth color defined in the second color gamut; and in a case where a color difference between the third color and the fourth color is less than a predetermined threshold: in a case where the first color is not included in the particular color information, correct a conversion parameter in the color conversion processing such that a color obtained by converting the first color is a fifth color whose color difference from the fourth color is greater than the color difference between the third color and the fourth color and which is defined in the second color gamut, and in a case where the first color is included in the particular color information, correct a conversion parameter in the color conversion processing such that a color obtained by converting the second color is a sixth color whose color difference from the third color is greater than the color difference between the third color and the fourth color and which is defined in the second color gamut. Similar prior art such as U.S. patent application publication 2022/0321739 by Morikawa discloses color gamut conversions where priority colors have been identified but fails to specifically disclose a branching conversion process for similar colors when one of the similar colors is a priority color. Claims 2-19 are allowed because they depend upon an allowed claim. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN O DULANEY whose telephone number is (571)272-2874. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abderrahim Merouan can be reached at (571)270-5254. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BENJAMIN O. DULANEY Primary Examiner Art Unit 2676 /BENJAMIN O DULANEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2683
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682654
BACKEND LEARNABLE DECODER TO FACILITATE AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE OPERATION
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670998
Noninvasive Determination of Resting State Diastole Hemodynamic Information
4y 12m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12657662
SENSOR SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SENSING A PHYSICAL QUANTITY
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12657957
DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM AND DATA PROCESSING METHOD
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650666
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING PHASE INFORMATION
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+11.5%)
3y 3m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 573 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month