Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/957,649

GAME CONTROLLER WITH ADJUSTABLE INTERFACE POSITION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 22, 2024
Priority
Mar 20, 2024 — CN 202420546946.7
Examiner
WONG, JEFFREY KEITH
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Dongguan King Sheng Electronics Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
367 granted / 559 resolved
+5.7% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
588
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§103
57.8%
+17.8% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 559 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the action" in line 23. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. All dependent claims inherit the deficiencies of the claim(s) from which they depend and are similarly rejected for the same reason. Best Applicable Prior Art The closest applicable prior art, Khaira et al., US 20210275907 is interpreted as disclosing: A game controller with adjustable interface position, comprising: a main body; wherein the main body is provided with a back plate, a connector and an adjusting mechanism; the back plate is configured to support a to-be-connected device; the connector is configured for connection with the to-be-connected device; and the adjusting mechanism is configured to adjust a position of the connector; the adjusting mechanism comprises a mounting frame arranged on the main body. The prior art is interpreted as failing to disclose the claimed in the invention in the context of the specification, namely; the mounting frame is provided with a first slide rail extending in a direction from a front side of the main body to a rear side of the main body; the first slide rail is slidably provided with a first block structure; a second slide rail is provided on the mounting frame, and a second block structure is slidably provided on the second slide rail; and the second block structure is configured to convert a vertical motion of the connector into a horizontal motion of the connector; the connector is provided on the first block structure; the first block structure is configured for adjusting the position of the connector; a sliding direction of the second block structure on the second slide rail is not parallel to a sliding direction of the first block structure on the first slide rail; each of the first block structure and the second block structure has an inclined abutting surface; and the inclined abutting surface of the first block structure is configured to fit the inclined abutting surface of the second block structure; and the mounting frame is further provided with a spring configured to cooperate with the second block structure; and the spring is configured to be subject to elastic deformation under the action of the second block structure and the mounting frame in response to a case that the second block structure slides along the second slide rail. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Mao, US US-11325026 Khaira, US-20210275907 Ikuta, US-20180099218 Michael, US-20100195279 Dong-Kook, US-20020155890 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFREY WONG whose telephone number is (571)270-3003. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kang Hu can be reached at (571) 270-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEFFREY K WONG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682722
LIMITED PAYOUT SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676053
GAME AWARD ENHANCEMENT FOR ADJACENT GAME SYMBOLS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676054
GAMING MACHINE AND METHOD USING LINKED VALUE-BEARING SYMBOLS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670767
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BULK INCREMENTING A BONUS PRIZE AND REPEATEDLY PROVIDING THE BONUS PRIZE IN ASSOCIATION WITH A PLURALITY OF FREE SPINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12664855
GAMING MACHINE, CONTROL METHOD FOR MACHINE, AND PROGRAM FOR GAMING MACHINE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+27.2%)
3y 6m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 559 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month