Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/958,260

EMERGENCY STARTING POWER SUPPLY WITH CONTACT IMPEDANCE DETECTION

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Nov 25, 2024
Examiner
BARNETT, JOEL
Art Unit
2849
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Grepow Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
346 granted / 431 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
467
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
50.0%
+10.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 431 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-18 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,153,100. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Allowable Subject Matter As noted in prior U.S. Patent No. 12,153,100, the claims contain allowable subject matter. However, the Double Patenting Rejection must be addressed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art, alone or in combination, fails to disclose all of the limitations of the claims, especially a detection module, connected to the first clamp and the second clamp, used to detect the impedance of the device’s positive contact, and also used to detect the impedance of the device’s negative contact; a power switch, connected between the first clamp and an energy module or between the second clamp and the energy module; a system control module is electrically connected to the detection module to obtain the contact impedance of the first clamp and the contact impedance of the second clamp; and provides a signal to the power switch to turn on the power switch so that the energy module provides energy to the first clamp and the second clamp of independent claim 1 with similar more specific language present in independent claim 10. Wu (US 11,686,778) is considered the most relevant prior art as it discloses a power supply for boosting a vehicle battery for starting which can detect the vehicle battery health. However, Wu fails to discloses that the connection between the clamps and each of the connections to the energy module (battery) are measured for impedance. Ogirko (US 12,025,675), Toscani et al. (US 2019/0081492) and Koebler (US 2017/0346140) are also considered relevant prior art as each discloses aspects of providing power/energy to a battery or measuring aspects of a battery. However, none disclose the above noted limitations. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOEL BARNETT whose telephone number is (571)272-2879. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at (571) 272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOEL BARNETT/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 /DANIEL CAVALLARI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603527
ENERGY COLLECTION DEVICE AND RECTIFIER CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597798
REDUNDANT POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589675
FUEL CELL VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586935
METHODS OF DELIVERING POWER TO COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK EQUIPMENT AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND COAXIAL CABLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583363
ELECTRIC VEHICLE EMPLOYING FUEL CELLS AND RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.5%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 431 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month