Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 18/958,535

MULTIDIMENSIONAL CODING OF STIMULATION PULSES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 25, 2024
Priority
Sep 14, 2020 — EU 20195989.7 +1 more
Examiner
MALAMUD, DEBORAH LESLIE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Cochlear Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
687 granted / 878 resolved
+18.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
914
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§103
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§102
45.0%
+5.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 878 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 8-9 and 17 are objected to because of the following informalities: claim 8 requires “the stimulation signals are delivered to the recipient of via an electrode array”. There appears to be at least one word missing between “recipient of” and “via”. Claim 9 requires “where the perceptual information is”. This should be changed to “wherein the perceptual information is”. Claim 17 requires “wherein signal processor unit”. There is a missing “the” before “signal processor unit”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Schleich et al (U.S. 9,180,295). Schleich discloses (Fig. 1) at a hearing device (col. 5, line 12-col. 7, line 13), obtaining at least one audio signal comprising multiple acoustic parameters, wherein the hearing device includes a memory unit storing a plurality of multidimensional perceptual models, and wherein each multidimensional perceptual model includes perceptual information as a function of coding parameter groups; retrieving a selected multidimensional perceptual model of the plurality of multidimensional perceptual models from the memory unit; using the selected multidimensional perceptual model to convert the at least one audio signal into one or more processed signals such that at least one piece of perceptual information is encoded as function of the coding parameter groups in the selected multidimensional perceptual model; and generating, using the one or more processed signals, stimulation signals for delivery to a recipient of the hearing device. Regarding claim 2, Schleich discloses (col. 5, lines 20-34) the selected multidimensional perceptual model is selected based on perceptual information of interest determined for a given time period, and wherein the perceptual information of interest varies with respect to one or more of the multiple acoustic parameters. Regarding claim 3, Schleich discloses (col. 4, line 56-col. 5, line 3) determining the perceptual information of interest for a given time period based on a sound coding strategy selected for use by the hearing device. Regarding claim 4, Schleich discloses (col. 4, line 56-col. 5, line 3) determining the perceptual information of interest for a given time period based on an acoustic environment of the hearing device. Regarding claim 5, Schleich discloses (col. 6, lines 32-65) selecting a sequence of coding parameter groups of the selected multidimensional perceptual model, processing the at least one audio signal into a plurality of band limited audio signals; mapping each coding parameter group of the sequence of coding parameter groups to one of the plurality of band limited audio signals based on an acoustic parameter of the multiple acoustic parameters to generate a plurality of mapped signals, and coding the plurality of mapped signals into a plurality of stimulation pulses for delivery to the recipient via a plurality of electrodes. Regarding claim 6, Schleich discloses (col. 6, line 66-col. 7, line 13) the selected sequence of coding parameter groups fulfils at least one objective criterion while adhering to at least one constraint criterion. Regarding claim 7, Schleich discloses (col. 6, lines 32-65) the at least one objective criterion is determined based on the perceptual information of interest, and wherein the at least one objective criterion is at least a maximized range and/or resolution of pitch of the recipient. Regarding claim 8, Schleich discloses (Abstract) the stimulation signals are delivered to the recipient of [sic] via an electrode array comprising a plurality of electrodes. Regarding claim 9, Schleich discloses (col. 6, lines 32-65) the perceptual information is at least pitch. Regarding claim 10, Schleich discloses at least (col. 6, lines 32-65) each of the plurality of multidimensional perceptual models is customized for the recipient via a fitting procedure. Regarding claim 11, Schleich discloses (col. 5, lines 20-49) a coding parameter of a coding parameter group is at least a pulse amplitude. Regarding claim 12, Schleich discloses (col. 6, lines 32-65) a coding parameter of a coding parameter group is at least an interaural level difference. Regarding claim 13, Schleich discloses (Fig. 1) one or more microphones configured to (col. 5, line 12-col. 7, line 13) generate at least one audio signal comprising multiple acoustic parameters; a memory unit storing a plurality of multidimensional perceptual models, wherein each multidimensional perceptual model includes perceptual information as a function of coding parameter groups; a signal processor unit configured to: retrieve a selected multidimensional perceptual model of the plurality of multidimensional perceptual models from the memory unit, and use the selected multidimensional perceptual model to convert the at least one audio signal into one or more processed signals such that at least one piece of perceptual information is encoded as function of the coding parameter groups in the selected multidimensional perceptual model; and a coding unit configured to generate, using the one or more processed signals, stimulation signals for delivery to a recipient of the hearing device. Regarding claim 14, Schleich discloses (col. 5, lines 20-34) the selected multidimensional perceptual model is selected based on perceptual information of interest determined for a given time period, and wherein the perceptual information of interest varies with respect to one or more of the multiple acoustic parameters. Regarding claim 15, Schleich discloses (col. 4, line 56-col. 5, line 3) the signal processor unit is configured to determine the perceptual information of interest for a given time period based on a sound coding strategy selected for use by the hearing device. Regarding claim 16, Schleich discloses (col. 4, line 56-col. 5, line 3) the signal processor unit is configured to determine the perceptual information of interest for a given time period based on an acoustic environment of the hearing device. Regarding claim 17, Schleich discloses (col. 6, lines 32-65) signal processor unit is configured to: select a sequence of coding parameter groups of the selected multidimensional perceptual model; process the at least one audio signal into a plurality of band limited audio signals; and map each coding parameter group of the sequence of coding parameter groups to one of the plurality of band limited audio signals based on an acoustic parameter of the multiple acoustic parameters to generate a plurality of mapped signals; wherein the coding unit is configured to code the plurality of mapped signals into a plurality of stimulation pulses for delivery to the recipient via a plurality of electrodes. Regarding claim 18, Schleich discloses (col. 6, line 66-col. 7, line 13) the selected sequence of coding parameter groups fulfils at least one objective criterion while adhering to at least one constraint criterion. Regarding claim 19, Schleich discloses (col. 6, lines 32-65) the at least one objective criterion is determined based on the perceptual information of interest, and wherein the at least one objective criterion is at least a maximized range and/or resolution of pitch of the recipient. Regarding claim 20, Schleich discloses (col. 6, lines 32-65) the perceptual information is at least pitch. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. 2012/0130449 to Carlyon et al, as provided by the Applicant. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEBORAH L MALAMUD whose telephone number is (571)272-2106. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 1:00-9:30 Eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Unsu Jung can be reached at (571) 272-8506. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DEBORAH L MALAMUD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 25, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12752099
PERCUTANEOUS CIRCULATORY SUPPORT SYSTEM HAVING IMPROVED TORQUE AND BLOOD FLOW
4y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12733822
Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate Measurements from Imagery
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722010
METHODS OF SELECTING PARAMETERS FOR THERAPEUTIC NEUROMODULATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12702837
DETERMINING ESTIMATED NEURAL THRESHOLD WITH ECAP SIGNALS
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12690797
AMBULATORY DETECTION OF QT PROLONGATION
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+9.6%)
3y 3m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 878 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month