Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 27, 2026
Application No. 18/958,632

OPTICAL DEVICE AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 25, 2024
Priority
Oct 08, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0136723
Examiner
ROJAS CADIMA, OMAR
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hyundai Motor Group
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
441 granted / 612 resolved
+4.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
636
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 612 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/3/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 6/3/2026 is acknowledged. Accordingly, claims 5-6 have been cancelled, claims 1-2, 4 and 15 have been amended, thus currently claims 1-4, 6-7 and 9-15 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4, 6-7 and 9-15 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, and similarly in claim 15, the phrase “wherein curvatures of the curved shape of the open front surface and the re-incidence surface are configured to be adjusted to form an optical path” is unclear because: Figures 1-4 shows a one-piece optical device already manufactured. The written specification agrees with the figures in that the optical device is integrally formed (see ¶ 31) therefore, it is unclear how any part of the optical device is “adjusted”. Although, the specification recites mentions “the size of the opening 1222 may be adjusted. In addition, the quantity of light 112 leakage may be adjusted by adjusting the size of the opening 1222.” see ¶ 64, or “The quantity of light 112 incident on the re-incidence surface 1225 after leaking through the opening 1222 may be adjusted by adjusting the width w1 of the opening 1222 in the leftward-rightward direction (the x-axis direction) or the width w2 of the re-incidence surface 1225 in the leftward-rightward direction (the x-axis direction)” see ¶ 65. It is clear any adjustment was done during the manufacturing of the optical device, that is in a previous step to the device shown in the figures. For purpose of examination the phrase above has been interpreted to mean -- wherein curvatures of the curved shape of the open front surface and the re-incidence surface are configured to form an optical path –. Claims 2-4, 6-7 and 9-15 are rejected as they depend from claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Dong et al. (WO 2022001087 A1 discloses an optical device having a light source, a light guide and a light emission lens. The light guide further includes an first and second optical path portions, and two convexly curved surfaces for exiting and r entering of light. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OMAR ROJAS CADIMA whose telephone number is (571)272-8007. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdulmajeed Aziz can be reached at 571-270-5046. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OMAR ROJAS CADIMA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Jan 20, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 20, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 28, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 28, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 03, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742727
AIR QUALITY MEASURING DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742531
MOTOR-VEHCILE LIGHTING MODULE THAT PRODUCES A CUTOFF WITH A REFLECTOR THE SURFACE OF WHICH IS PARTIALLY GRAINED
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736195
VEHICULAR ILLUMINATION MODULE
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729827
THROUGH LAMP FOR VEHICLE AND VEHICLE HAVING SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729828
LIGHT MODULE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE LIGHTING DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A LIGHT MODULE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+14.5%)
1y 12m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 612 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month