Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/958,718

REMOTE WAGERING GAME SYSTEM OPERABLE WITH UNIVERSAL INTERFACE PLUGIN

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 25, 2024
Examiner
LANEAU, RONALD
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Brightstar Global Solutions Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1331 granted / 1510 resolved
+18.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1524
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§103
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1510 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 10 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1, 10 and 15, the claims recite the limitations "a native remote gaming server operable to send a first copy of a universal interface plugin to a first player electronic device" and similarly “the native remote gaming server operable to send a first copy of a universal interface plugin to a first player electronic device” and later on recite “responsive to a first game launch request … to send the first copy of the universal interface…” These limitations render the claim indefinite because it appears they require the same plugin to be sent twice by the native remote gaming server and also upon request by the first player electronic device. Furthermore, the claims recite “… the first player electronic device can be integrated with ….” This limitation is functional and vague and it is unclear what the requirements are for the word “integrated” in the claims. As a result, claims 1-20 are rejected. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. None of the references, either singularly or in combination, discloses or even suggests: As per claims 1-9, a remote wagering game system comprising: the native remote gaming server operable, responsive to a first game launch request by the first player electronic device for the third party hosted game, to send the first copy of the universal interface plugin to the first player electronic device, such that the first copy of the universal interface plugin sent to the first player electronic device can be integrated with the first player user interface based on the first game launch request; and the native remote gaming server operable, responsive to a second game launch request by the second player electronic device for the third party hosted game, to send the second copy of the universal interface plugin to the second player electronic device, such that the second copy of the universal interface plugin sent to the second player electronic device can be integrated with the second player user interface based on the second game launch request. As per claims 10-14, a remote wagering game system comprising: the native remote gaming server being operable, responsive to a second game launch request by the second player electronic device for the third party hosted game, to send the second copy of the universal interface plugin to the second player electronic device, such that the second copy of the universal interface plugin sent to the second player electronic device can be integrated with the second player user interface based on the second game launch request; and the native remote gaming server is operable to send a second copy of the game wrapper to the second player electronic device responsive to the second game launch request by the second player electronic device for the third party hosted game, wherein the second copy of the game wrapper is executable by the second player electronic device to integrate the second copy of the universal interface plugin with the second player user interface. As claims 15-20, a remote wagering game system comprising: the native remote gaming server operable, responsive to a first game launch request by the first player electronic device for the hosted game, to send the first copy of the universal interface plugin to the first player electronic device, such that the first copy of the universal interface plugin sent to the first player electronic device can be integrated with the first player user interface based on the first game launch request; and the native remote gaming server operable, responsive to a second game launch request by the second player electronic device for the hosted game, to send the second copy of the universal interface plugin to the second player electronic device, such that the second copy of the universal interface plugin sent to the second player electronic device can be integrated with the first player user interface based on the second game launch request. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See references cited on PTO form 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RONALD LANEAU whose telephone number is (571)272-6784. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 6-4:30 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Vasat can be reached on 571-270-7625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PNG media_image1.png 275 275 media_image1.png Greyscale /Ronald Laneau/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702928
INFORMATION STORAGE MEDIUM, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702913
HEADSET FOR COMBINING VIRTUAL ELEMENTS WITH PHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF A GOLF GAME, AND ITS SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702929
PROGRAM, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, AND SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697550
Apparatus for Providing Conversation Services and Method Thereof
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697542
LOW-DELAY MULTI-PASS FRAME-LEVEL RATE CONTROL USING A SHARED REFERENCE FRAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+9.9%)
2y 1m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1510 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month