Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/958,804

METHOD, SYSTEM AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR GENERATING AN ALERT FOR POTENTIAL STRUCTURAL DAMAGE FROM AN EARTHQUAKE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 25, 2024
Examiner
LA, ANH V
Art Unit
2685
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
National Applied Research Laboratories
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
962 granted / 1141 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1163
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1141 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 and 8-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vancho (US 2020/0003918). Regarding claim 1, Vancho discloses method for generating an alert for potential structural damage from an earthquake, implemented using a system that is connected to a seismograph, and an external alert device that is disposed at a target structure, the method comprising: a) in response to receipt of a first-arrival seismic wave dataset, which is related to a first-arrival seismic wave of the earthquake, from the seismograph (paragraph 20, p. 35), implementing a signal processing procedure to process the first-arrival seismic wave dataset (p. 45-p.46), and to calculate an estimated seismic wave parameter set that includes a spectral acceleration (p. 35, p. 47, p. 53); b) calculating, based on the estimated seismic wave parameter set and a basic structural parameter set that is associated with the target structure 220, a ductility value (p. 63), the basic structural parameter set including a geographical location of the target structure (p. 36, p. 37, p. 62), a structural ultimate base shear coefficient (p. 39, p. 45), and an initially hypothetical structural fundamental oscillation period (p. 37); and c) in a case where the ductility value is larger than a predetermined threshold (p. 63), generating and transmitting an alert control signal to the external alert device (S349, p. 43, p. 63), so as to control the external alert device to output an alert for potential structural damage of the target structure based on the alert control signal (figure 3, p. 39, p. 42, p. 63). Regarding claim 2, Vancho discloses the earthquake including a second-arrival seismic wave that arrives later than the first-arrival seismic wave, wherein step c) is implemented at one or both of a first time instance that is between arrival of the first-arrival seismic wave and arrival of the second-arrival seismic wave, and a second time instance that is after the arrival of the second-arrival seismic wave (p. 45-p. 46). Regarding claim 8, Vancho a system for generating an alert for potential structural damage from an earthquake, the system being connected to a seismograph, and an external alert device that is disposed at a target structure, the system comprising: a communication unit (figure 4) that communicates with the external alert device (p. 39, p. 42, p. 63) and that receives a first-arrival seismic wave dataset, which is related to a first-arrival seismic wave of the earthquake, from the seismograph (p. 20, p. 35); a data storage unit (p. 41, p. 84) that stores a basic structural parameter set that is associated with the target structure, the basic structural parameter set including a geographical location of the target structure (p. 36, p. 37, p. 62), a structural ultimate base shear coefficient (p. 39, p. 45), and an initially hypothetical structural fundamental oscillation period (p. 37); and a processing unit (figure 4, p. 39, p. 41) that is connected to the communication unit and the data storage unit (figure 4), and that is programmed to implement a signal processing procedure to process the first-arrival seismic wave dataset (p. 45, p.46), calculate an estimated seismic wave parameter set (p. 63) including a spectral acceleration (p. 35, p. 47, p. 53), calculate, based on the estimated seismic wave parameter set and the basic structural parameter set, a ductility value (p. 63), and in a case where the ductility value is larger than a predetermined threshold (p. 63), generate and transmit an alert control signal to the external alert device (S349, p. 42, p. 63), so as to control the external alert device to output an alert for potential structural damage of the target structure based on the alert control signal (figure 3, p. 39, p. 42, p. 63). Regarding claim 9, Vancho discloses the earthquake including a second-arrival seismic wave that arrives later than the first-arrival seismic wave, wherein the processing unit is programmed to transmit the alert control signal at one or both of a first time instance that is between arrival of the first-arrival seismic wave and arrival of the second-arrival seismic wave, and a second time instance that is after the arrival of the second-arrival seismic wave (p. 45, p. 46). Regarding claim 15, Vancho discloses a non-transitory computer storage medium storing computer instructions that, when executed by a processing unit of a computer device, cause the processing unit to execute the steps of the method as claimed in claim 1 (p. 41). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7 and 10-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Febonio, Amir, Thompson, and Wani disclose seismic event detection systems. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANH V LA whose telephone number is (571)272-2970. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Quan-Zhen Wang can be reached at 571-272-3114. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANH V LA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685 ANH V. LA Primary Examiner Art Unit 2685 Al January 6, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600375
PARKING ASSISTANCE DEVICE AND PARKING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586455
DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR MONITORING CONTROLLED SPACES FOR TRANSITORY USES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573293
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ADVANCED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565196
PARKING ASSISTANCE DEVICE, PARKING ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557790
SYSTEMS, METHODS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR MONITORING THE BEHAVIOR, HEALTH, AND/OR CHARACTERISTICS OF AN ANIMAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1141 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month