Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/959,214

MECHANISM FOR PREVENTING BEARING CREEP

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Nov 25, 2024
Examiner
WAITS, ALAN B
Art Unit
3617
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tesla Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
949 granted / 1380 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1419
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
41.1%
+1.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1380 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 16-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 30 June 2026. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “through slot” and “hole” of claim 8 and 15; and the “drive unit” and “motor” of Fig. 10 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. The drawings are objected to because the shading of the drawings is not consistent with MPEP §608.02(V)(m). Specifically, Figs. 1A-5B and improperly shaded. Shading should be removed from Fig. 1A-4. The shading outside the housing of Fig. 5A-5B should be removed. The shading should be improved for Fig. 5A and 5B for clarity. Furthermore, the scale for Fig. 5A and 5B are unitless. Still further, the scale appears to have similar shades of grey for more than one value on the scale, rendering the drawing confusing. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 7 recites “the bearing housing is a portion of a top gear box or a bottom gear box”. This renders the scope of the claim indefinite. The scope of the claim is a bearing assembly. The top gear box and the bottom gear box are outside the scope of the bearing assembly. Thus, it is unclear if the scope of the claims is simply the bearing assembly or the gear box. For the purpose of examination, it is assumed that the scope of the claim is intended to be just the bearing housing and not the gear box. The examiner further notes that there is no reference datum from which “top” or “bottom” are measured. Still further, it is unclear how the limitation “is a portion of a top gear box or a bottom gear box” in any way structurally limits the bearing housing. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-12 and 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Schaube DE 102015012375. Re clm 1, Schaube discloses a bearing assembly (Fig. 1) for power transmission ([0009]), the bearing assembly comprising: a bearing outer ring (10) comprising a first surface and a second surface (axial facing surfaces), the bearing outer ring structurally forming at least a first recess (22) on the first surface; a bearing housing (4) configured to house the bearing outer ring, the bearing housing structurally forming at least a cavity (28); and a retaining plunger (32 and 30) comprising a spring (30), the retaining plunger at least partially enclosed by the cavity, wherein, when the first recess and the retaining plunger are misaligned with each other, the retaining plunger is compressed by the first surface of the bearing outer ring into the cavity (as shown by Fig. 4). Re clm 2 and 11, Schaube further discloses when the first recess and the retaining plunger are aligned with each other, the retaining plunger engages the first recess to prevent the bearing outer ring to rotate relative to the bearing housing (as shown in Fig. 3). Re clm 3, Schaube further discloses the spring causes the retaining plunger to engage the first recess when the first recess and the retaining plunger are aligned with each other (shown in Fig. 3). Re clm 5 and 14, Schaube further discloses a bearing inner ring (9) and a plurality of rolling elements (7), wherein the plurality of rolling elements are sandwiched between the bearing outer ring and the bearing inner ring (Fig. 1). Re clm 6, Schaube further discloses the plurality of rolling elements comprise tapered rollers (Fig. 1; [0009]). Re clm 7, Schaube further discloses the bearing housing is a portion of a top gear box or a bottom gear box ([0022]). Re clm 8 and 15, Schaube further discloses the first recess comprises a notch, a slot, a through slot or a hole (22 is shown as each of these, especially a notch). Re clm 9, Schaube further discloses the retaining plunger comprises a spring-loaded dowel pin, a detent pin, or a plunger (Fig. 3). Re clm 10, Schaube discloses a drive unit for a vehicle ([0022]), the drive unit comprising: a motor configured to drive a gearbox (transmission; vehicle transmissions must be driven by a motor); and the gearbox comprising: a bearing (Fig. 1) comprising a bearing outer ring (10), the bearing outer ring structurally forming a first recess (22, Fig. 3) on a first surface, a bearing housing (4) configured to house the bearing, the bearing housing structurally forming at least a cavity (28), and a retaining plunger (30 and 32) at least partially enclosed by the cavity, wherein the retaining plunger is compressed by the first surface of the bearing outer ring (Fig. 4) into the cavity when the first recess and the retaining plunger are misaligned with each other. Re clm 12, Schaube further discloses the retaining plunger comprises a spring (30), the spring causes the retaining plunger to engage the first recess when the first recess and the retaining plunger are aligned with each other (shown in Fig. 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Schaube DE 102015012375 as applied to claims 1 and 10 above, and further in view of Nieman U.S. 2003/0103704. Schaube discloses all the claimed subject matter as described above. Re clm 4 and 13, Schaube does not disclose the bearing outer ring structurally forms a second recess on the second surface, and wherein the second surface and the first surface face toward opposite directions. Nieman teaches a bearing arrangement comprising anti-rotation features in which the bearing outer ring structurally forms a second recess (34s, Fig. 2) on the second surface (34s are located on both axial sides of the bearing), and wherein the second surface and the first surface face toward opposite directions (shown in Fig. 2) for the purpose of allowing the bearing to be mounted within the housing without reference to a preferred direction ([0027]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill I the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Schaube and provide the recess on both axial sides of the bearing such that the bearing outer ring structurally forms a second recess on the second surface, and wherein the second surface and the first surface face toward opposite direction for the purpose of allowing the bearing to be mounted within the housing without reference to a preferred direction. Claims 10-12 and 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kraeuter U.S. 2023/0235792 in view of DE 29906373. Re clm 10, Kraeuter discloses a drive unit for a vehicle ([0001]), the drive unit comprising: a motor (12) configured to drive a gearbox (transmission 16); and the gearbox comprising: a bearing (either of 40 or 42) comprising a bearing outer ring, a bearing housing (casing 36 and/or 38) configured to house the bearing. Kraeuter does not disclose the bearing outer ring structurally forming a first recess on a first surface, the bearing housing structurally forming at least a cavity, and a retaining plunger at least partially enclosed by the cavity, wherein the retaining plunger is compressed by the first surface of the bearing outer ring into the cavity when the first recess and the retaining plunger are misaligned with each other. DE ‘373 teaches a locking means comprising the bearing outer ring (1) structurally forming a first recess (5, Fig. 1-3) on a first surface (axially facing surface of outer ring), the bearing housing structurally forming at least a cavity (6), and a retaining plunger (7 and 8) at least partially enclosed by the cavity, wherein the retaining plunger is compressed by the first surface of the bearing outer ring into the cavity when the first recess and the retaining plunger are misaligned with each other (as shown in Fig. 3) for the purpose of affixing the bearing outer ring to housing so that it cannot rotate ([0006]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Kraeuter and provide the bearing outer ring structurally forming a first recess on a first surface, the bearing housing structurally forming at least a cavity, and a retaining plunger at least partially enclosed by the cavity, wherein the retaining plunger is compressed by the first surface of the bearing outer ring into the cavity when the first recess and the retaining plunger are misaligned with each other for the purpose of affixing the bearing outer ring to housing so that it cannot rotate. Re clm 11, the improvement of DE ‘373 further discloses the first recess and the retaining plunger are aligned with each other, the retaining plunger engages the first recess to prevent the bearing outer ring to rotate relative to the bearing housing (Fig. 2). Re clm 12, the improvement of DE ‘373 further discloses the retaining plunger comprises a spring (8), and wherein the spring causes the retaining plunger to engage the first recess when the first recess and the retaining plunger are aligned with each other (Fig. 2). Re clm 14, Kraeuter further discloses the bearing comprises a bearing inner ring and a plurality of rolling elements, and wherein the plurality of rolling elements are sandwiched between the bearing outer ring and the bearing inner ring (Fig. 1). Re clm 15, the improvement of DE ‘373 further discloses the first recess comprises a hole (Fig. 1-4). Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kraeuter U.S. 2023/0235792 in view of DE 29906373 as applied to claim 10 above, and further in view of Nieman U.S. 2003/0103704. Kraeuter in view of DE ‘373 discloses all the claimed subject matter as described above. Re clm 13, Kraeuter in view of DE ‘373 does not disclose the bearing outer ring structurally forms a second recess on the second surface, and wherein the second surface and the first surface face toward opposite directions. Nieman teaches a bearing arrangement comprising anti-rotation features in which the bearing outer ring structurally forms a second recess (34s, Fig. 2) on the second surface (34s are located on both axial sides of the bearing), and wherein the second surface and the first surface face toward opposite directions (shown in Fig. 2) for the purpose of allowing the bearing to be mounted within the housing without reference to a preferred direction ([0027]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill I the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Kraeuter in view of DE ‘373 and provide the recess on both axial sides of the bearing such that the bearing outer ring structurally forms a second recess on the second surface, and wherein the second surface and the first surface face toward opposite direction for the purpose of allowing the bearing to be mounted within the housing without reference to a preferred direction. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALAN B WAITS whose telephone number is (571)270-3664. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday from 6-4 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John R Olszewski can be reached at 571-272-2706. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALAN B WAITS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3617
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 25, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Aug 24, 2026
Interview Requested
Sep 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747757
BEARING COMPONENT WITH PIEZOELECTRIC CORE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736085
BEARING
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729722
BEARING UNIT
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723627
ELECTROLYTIC CORROSION PREVENTION MEMBER FOR ROLLING BEARING AND ELECTROLYTIC CORROSION PREVENTION ROLLING BEARING UNIT
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723624
BEARING ASSEMBLY FOR VEHICLE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.8%)
2y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1380 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month