Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/959,972

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CHARGING STATION RECOMMENDATION

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Nov 26, 2024
Examiner
MO, XIAO EN
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hyundai Autoever Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
294 granted / 364 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
371
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
38.0%
-2.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§112
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 364 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the communication(s) filed on 11/26/2024. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter because the claim(s) as a whole, considering all claim elements both individually and in combination, do not amount to significantly more than an abstract idea. The claim(s) is/are directed to the abstract idea of gathering and calculating data. The additional element(s) or combination of elements in the claim(s) other than the abstract idea per se amount(s) to no more than: recitation of generic computer structure and limitations generally linking the use of the judicial exception to a particular technological environment that serves to perform generic computer functions that are well-understood, routine, and conventional activities previously known to the pertinent industry. Recitation of a structure to implement previous routine in the industry is not patentable. There are no meaningful limitations beyond linking the use to a particular technology. Viewed as a whole, these additional claim element(s) do not provide meaningful limitation(s) to transform the abstract idea into a patent eligible application of the abstract idea such that the claim(s) amounts to significantly more than the abstract idea itself. Therefore, the claim(s) are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as being directed to non-statutory subject matter. Additionally, the claims are merely directed to an abstract idea of gathering and calculating data. The claims do not recite improvements to another technology or technical field, improvements to the functioning of the computer itself, applying a judicial exception with, or by the use of, a particular machine, effecting a transformation or reduction of a particular article to a different state or thing, adding specific limitation other than what is well-understood, routine, and conventional in the field, or adding unconventional steps that confine the claim to a particular useful application, or other meaningful limitations beyond generally linking the use of the judicial exception to a particular technological environment. Therefore, considering the claims as a whole, the abstract idea of gathering and calculating data does not amount to significantly more than the abstract idea. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XIAO EN MO whose telephone number is (571)272-9970. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9-5:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phutthiwat Wongwian can be reached at 571-270-5426. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XIAO EN MO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12565849
SPRAY GUIDED STRATIFICATION FOR FUELING A PASSIVE PRE-CHAMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559078
BRAKING SYSTEM, COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD OF CONTROLLING A BRAKING SYSTEM OF A RAIL VEHICLE, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND NON-VOLATILE DATA CARRIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12553407
PORT-INJECTED ENGINE HAVING FUEL DISTRIBUTOR FOR REDUCED BIAS IN FUEL DISTRIBUTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12552250
CONTEXT-BASED MAPPING FOR PHYSICAL VEHICLE CONTROLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12556039
GROUND POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS, NONCONTACT POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD FOR GROUND POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+7.2%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 364 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month