Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/960,011

ROTOR ASSEMBLIES AND AIR MOBILITY INCLUDING SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 26, 2024
Examiner
GORDON, ANNA L
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
70 granted / 98 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
130
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 98 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 11 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 11, line 10 appears to contain a typographical error wherein it recites “swash plate assembly”. For purposes of examination, this recitation is interpreted as “a swash plate assembly”. Appropriate clarification or correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 and 10-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Taranukha (RU 2749709 C1). Regarding Claim 1, Taranukha discloses a rotor assembly (Fig. 1), comprising: a main shaft (14, Fig. 1); at least one blade disposed along a side of the main shaft (blades extending outwards at the top of 14, Fig. 1); a swash plate assembly (13 and 19-20, Fig. 1) disposed to be penetrated by the main shaft (14 penetrates at least 20, Fig. 1), connected to at least one of the at least one blade (20 is connected to the at least one blade via 21, Figs. 1-2), and configured to move along the main shaft (13 and 20 move along 14 via 11, for example, Fig. 1); a control link (17, Fig. 1); and a drive (electric motor and gearbox 28, Fig. 1-2) configured to control a position of a swash plate of the swash plate assembly (Abstract of attached translation, lines 7-10 and Fig. 1), wherein the drive comprises a motor configured to generate driving force by electrical energy (Abstract of attached translation, lines 7-10 and Fig. 1), wherein the swash plate and the drive are connected to each other by a non- back drive part configured to not transfer force from the swash plate to the drive (worm gear and worm shaft 16, Fig. 1 and attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para), wherein the non-back drive part comprises: a worm coupled to the drive and configured to transfer the driving force (worm shaft 16, Fig. 1 and attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para); a worm gear (“worm gear”, see attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para), disposed between the control link and the worm (Fig. 1 and see attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para), having a shape corresponding to the worm (attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para, examiner notes a worm gear is configured to work with the worm and therefore clearly has a shape corresponding to the worm); and a gear link (12, Fig. 1) having a first end connected to the control link (first end of 12 is connected to 17, Fig. 1) and a second end configured to be rotated based on being coupled to the worm gear (second end of 12 rotates based on 16, Fig. 1 and attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para), and wherein the control link has a first end coupled to the swash plate (first end of 17 is coupled to 13, Fig. 1) and a second end connected to the gear link (second end of 17 is connected to 12, Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 2, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 1, wherein a pitch of the blade is configured to be adjusted based on a position of the at least one swash plate (via cyclic control slider 12, for example, see attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para). Regarding Claim 3, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 2, wherein the pitch is based on an angle of rotation about a length-direction shaft of the blade (via 21 and 25, see Figs. 1-2 and Abstract). Regarding Claim 4, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 1, wherein the at least one swash plate assembly comprises: a first plate (13, Fig. 1), and the swash plate disposed below the first plate and configured to support the first plate (at least a portion of 19 is below 13 and supports 13, Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 5, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 4, wherein the rotor assembly further comprises a blade link (21, Fig. 1), wherein a first end of the blade link is connected to the first plate (21 is connected to 13 via 20, Fig. 1), and a second end of the blade link is connected to the blade (21 is connected to blade via 25, Figs. 1-2). Regarding Claim 6, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 4, wherein the first plate is coupled to the blade and is configured to rotate together with the main shaft and the blade (13 is coupled to the blade via 21 and rotates together with 14 and the blade, see attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para and Figs. 1-2). Regarding Claim 7, Taranukha teaches the rotor assembly of claim 4, wherein: the swash plate is coupled to the drive (19 is coupled to the gearbox and electric motor via 16, see attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para), and the drive is configured to adjust the position of the swash plate on the main shaft (Abstract of attached translation, lines 7-10 and Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 10, Taranukha discloses a rotor assembly (Fig. 1), comprising: a main shaft (14, Fig. 1); at least one blade disposed along a side of the main shaft (blades extending outwards at the top of 14, Fig. 1); at least one swash plate (13 and 19-20, Fig. 1) disposed to be penetrated by the main shaft (14 penetrates at least 20, Fig. 1), connected to at least one of the at least one blade (20 is connected to the at least one blade via 21, Figs. 1-2), and configured to move along the main shaft (Abstract, and 13 and 20 move along 14 via 11, for example, Fig. 1); and a drive (electric motor and gearbox 28, Fig. 1-2) configured to control a position of a swash plate of the at least one swash plate (Abstract of attached translation, lines 7-10 and Fig. 1), wherein the at least one swash plate and the drive are connected to each other by a non- back drive part configured to not transfer force from the swash plate to the drive (worm gear and worm shaft 16, Fig. 1 and attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para), wherein the drive comprises: a motor configured to generate driving force by electrical energy (Abstract of attached translation, lines 7-10 and Fig. 1); and a control link (17, Fig. 1) having a first end coupled to the swash plate (first end of 17 is coupled to 13, Fig. 1) and a second end connected to the motor (second end of 17 is connected to motor via 12, 11, and 16, Fig. 1), and wherein the non-back drive part comprises: a worm coupled to the drive and configured to transfer the driving force (worm shaft 16, Fig. 1 and attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para); a worm gear (“worm gear”, see attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para), disposed between the control link and the worm, having a shape corresponding to the worm (Fig. 1 and see attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para, examiner notes a worm gear is configured to work with the worm and therefore clearly has a shape corresponding to the worm); and a gear link (12, Fig.1 ) having a first end connected to the control link (first end of 12 is connected to 17, Fig. 1) and a second end configured to be rotated based on being coupled to the worm gear (second end of 12 rotates based on 16, Fig. 1 and attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para). Regarding Claim 11, Taranukha discloses a rotor assembly (Fig.1 ), comprising: a main shaft (14, Fig. 1) configured to rotate around a first axis (axis of rotation of 14, Fig. 1); blades disposed along a side of the main shaft (blades extending outwards at the top of 14, Fig. 1), wherein each blade of the blades is configured to: rotate around the first axis based on rotation of the main shaft (Pg. 9 of attached translation, 2nd para. “blades are attached to the bearing rotating cylinder 14…”), and rotate around a second axis, of the blade, different from the first axis (blades rotate about the longitudinal axis of to change the pitch of the blade, via 21 and 25, see Figs. 1-2 and Abstract); a control link (17, Fig. 1); a drive (electric motor and gearbox 28, Fig. 1-2) configured to provide power to cause the blades to rotate around the second axis (Abstract of attached translation, lines 7-10 and Fig. 1); and swash plate assembly (13 and 19-20, Fig. 1) connecting the blades to the drive (20 connects the blades to the drive via 21, Figs. 1-2) and configured to move along the main shaft (13 and 20 move along 14 via 11, for example, Fig. 1), wherein the drive is connected to a swash plate of the swash plate assembly (19, Fig. 1) via a non-back drive part (worm gear and worm shaft 16, Fig. 1 and attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para) configured to not transfer force from the swash plate to the drive (worm gear and worm shaft 16, Fig. 1 and attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para), wherein the drive comprises a motor configured to generate driving force by electrical energy (Abstract of attached translation, lines 7-10 and Fig. 1), wherein the non-back drive part comprises: a worm coupled to the drive and configured to transfer the driving force (worm shaft 16, Fig. 1 and attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para); a worm gear (“worm gear”, see attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para), disposed between the control link and the worm (Fig.1, and attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para), having a shape corresponding to the worm (attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para, examiner notes a worm gear is configured to work with the worm and therefore clearly has a shape corresponding to the worm); and a gear link (12, Fig. 1) having a first end connected to the control link (first end of 12 is connected to 17, Fig. 1) and a second end configured to be rotated based on being coupled to the worm gear (second end of 12 rotates based on 16, Fig. 1 and attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para), and wherein the control link has a first end coupled to the swash plate (first end of 17 is coupled to 13, Fig. 1) and a second end connected to the gear link (second end of 17 is connected to 12, Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 12, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 11, wherein, for each blade of the blades, a direction of the second axis is a longitudinal direction of the blade (blades rotate about the longitudinal axis of to change the pitch of the blade, via 21 and 25, see Figs. 1-2 and Abstract). Regarding Claim 13, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 11, wherein two or more drives are provided (cyclic step drive motor and gearbox 27 and electric motor and gearbox 28), and each of the drives is connected to the swash plate of the swash plate assembly (via 15 and 16, Fig. 1 and Pg. 8 of attached translation, last para. – Pg. 9, para. 2) and is configured to adjust a position and an angle of the swash plate (via 15 and 16, Fig. 1 and Pg. 8 of attached translation, last para. – Pg. 9, para. 2). Regarding Claim 14, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 11, wherein the at least one swash plate assembly comprises: a first plate (13, Fig. 1) connected to the blades and configured to rotate (13 is coupled to the blade via 21 and rotates together with 14 and the blade, see attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para and Figs. 1-2); and the swash plate configured to support the first plate and to rotate based on being connected to the drive (at least a portion of 19 is below 13 and supports 13, Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 15, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 14, further comprising: a blade hub (26, Fig. 1) disposed on one end of the main shaft and connecting the blades to the main shaft (Fig. 1); and a first auxiliary link disposed between the blade hub and the first plate (21 and 25, Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 16, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 15, wherein: the first auxiliary link comprises two links (21 and 25, Fig. 1), an angle between the two links is adjusted by a distance between the blade hub and the first plate (see attached translation, Pg. 8, 2nd para and Figs. 1-2), and the first auxiliary link connects the blade hub to the first plate (21 connects 25 to 13, Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 17, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 14, further comprising: a non-rotating portion body separated from the main shaft and the swash plate (1 and 2, Fig. 1), wherein the non-rotating body is configured to not rotate relative to an aircraft (see Pg. 8 of attached translation, “base 1 is part of the fuselage…inner pillar 2 is attached to the base with the help of bolts…”, wherein the rotor assembly is installed in the aircraft (Abstract, “multi-rotor aircraft”); and a second auxiliary link disposed between a portion of the non-rotating portion body and the second swash plate (9 and 11, Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 18, Taranukha discloses an air mobility device comprising the rotor assembly of claim 1 (Abstract, “multi-rotor aircraft”). Regarding Claim 19, Taranukha discloses the air mobility device of claim 18, further comprising: a fuselage of the air mobility device (see Pg. 8 of attached translation, “base 1 is part of the fuselage…), wherein the first end of the gear link is rotatably coupled to the second end of the control link (first end of 12 is rotatably coupled to the second end of 17, Fig. 1), and wherein the first end of the control link is rotatably coupled to the swash plate (first end of 17 is coupled to 13, Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 20, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 10, wherein the first end of the gear link is rotatably coupled to the second end of the control link (first end of 12 is rotatably coupled to the second end of 17, Fig. 1), wherein the second end of the control link is connected to the motor via the gear link, the worm gear, and the worm (second end of 17 is connected to the motor via 12 and 16, Fig. 1), and wherein the first end of the control link is rotatably coupled to the swash plate (first end of 17 is coupled to 13, Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 21, Taranukha discloses the rotor assembly of claim 11, wherein the first end of the gear link is rotatably coupled to the second end of the control link (first end of 12 is rotatably coupled to the second end of 17, Fig. 1), and wherein the first end of the control link is rotatably coupled to the swash plate (first end of 17 is coupled to 13, Fig. 1). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the prior art rejections of Claims 1-18 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's submission of an information disclosure statement under 37 CFR 1.97(c) with the timing fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(p) on 07/28/2025 prompted the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 609.04(b). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANNA LYNN GORDON whose telephone number is (571)270-5323. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSHUA HUSON can be reached at 571-270-5301. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANNA L. GORDON/Examiner, Art Unit 3642 /JOSHUA D HUSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Sep 16, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 05, 2025
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600462
Device for piloting an aircraft and associated method
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584433
DEFLECTOR EXHAUST NOZZLE FOR AS350/EC130 AND FOR OTHER SINGLE ENGINE HELICOPTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576984
FUSELAGE FOR AN AIRCRAFT OR SPACECRAFT, AND AIRCRAFT OR SPACECRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570395
Winglet Control Surfaces and Methods for Use Therewith
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557910
FLEXIBLE SUPPORT DEVICE FOR CHAIR BACK TILTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.5%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 98 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month