Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/960,085

STRUCTURAL VENT CHANNEL FOR RECHARGEABLE ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM OF VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Nov 26, 2024
Examiner
HANNON, TIMOTHY
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
420 granted / 515 resolved
+29.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
527
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 515 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION This is on the merits of Application No. 18/960085, filed on 11/26/2024. Claims 1-20 are pending. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS), submitted on 08/20/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8-9 and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 states “wherein a plurality of leg openings are formed in the plastic material”. It is unclear what these “leg openings” are and how to interpret this limitation. A review of the drawings show “leg openings” 66 in Fig. 4. No other figure shows leg openings 66. They are only described in par. [0036], which simply states “As shown in FIG. 4, the bridge legs 54 may include one or more leg openings 66 in the plastic material 62 with, in some embodiments, the wire mesh 64 extends across the leg openings 66. Inclusion of the leg openings 66 allows for rapid depressurization in the vent passage 50 between the cell bridge 48 and the battery cells 44 during the early stage of a thermal event so that the plastic material 62 can quickly melt.” However, looking at element 66 in Fig. 4, there does not appear to be anything different between element 66 and the rest of the plastic material 62. Is there meant to be some kind of opening at 66 not shown? It is unclear how to interpret, and thus how to examine this limitation. The same applies to claim 18. Claims 9 and 19 are rejected for being dependent on claims 8 and 18, respectively. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5-11, 13, and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent App. Pub. No. 2021/0074960 to Stude et al. Stude discloses: (Claim 1) A rechargeable energy storage system (RESS) of a vehicle (Fig. 1A, 2, 3), comprising: a plurality of battery cells (12), the plurality of battery cells including a plurality of vent passages (passages between battery cells) to exhaust hot vent gas from the plurality of battery cells (see par. [0051], Fig. 2); and a cell bridge (1) disposed over the plurality of vent passages, the cell bridge comprising a wire mesh (2, 21, par. [0088], [0089]) and a plastic material (6, par. [0079], [0090]). (Claim 11) A vehicle (Fig. 2), comprising: a vehicle body; a powertrain disposed in the vehicle body; and a rechargeable energy storage system operably connected to the powertrain, the RESS including: a plurality of battery cells, the plurality of battery cells including a plurality of vent passages to exhaust hot vent gas from the plurality of battery cells; and a cell bridge disposed over the plurality of vent passages, the cell bridge comprising a wire mesh and a plastic material (see claim 1 above). (Claims 3 and 13) wherein the wire mesh is configured to contain particles greater than a predetermined threshold size in a vent passage defined between the cell bridge and the plurality of battery cells (inherent in the mesh structure). (Claims 5 and 15) wherein the cell bridge is connected to and supportive of a cover of the RESS (see Fig. 2). (Claims 6 and 16) wherein the cell bridge is secured to the cover via an adhesive layer (par. [0102]). (Claims 7 and 17) wherein the wire mesh is a steel material (Par. [0089]). (Claims 8 and 18 as best understood) wherein a plurality of leg openings are formed in the plastic material (par. [0121], Fig. 3 element 1B. Although unclear what exactly is meant by “leg openings” the insulation element formed between batteries is interpreted as a “leg opening”). (Claims 9 and 19) wherein the wire mesh extends through the plurality of leg openings (see Fig. 3, 1B extends through leg openings and includes the mesh). (Claims 10 and 20) wherein the cell bridge is formed by overmolding the plastic material over the wire mesh (it is noted that this recites a product-by-process limitation. Even though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2, 4, 12, and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Stude. (Claims 2 and 12) wherein the plastic material is configured to melt when exposed to temperatures greater than 150 degrees Celsius. (Claims 4 and 14) wherein the predetermined threshold size is a 0.9 millimeter effective diameter. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified, with a reasonable expectation of success, the structure of Stude to have the plastic material configured to melt when exposed to temperatures greater than 150 degrees Celsius and the wire mesh configured to contain particles greater than a threshold size of 0.9 millimeter effective diameter, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Proll (US 2023/0216106) discloses a cell cooling cover for a battery module. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY HANNON whose telephone number is (571)270-1943. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ernesto Suarez can be reached at (571) 270-5565. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY HANNON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703240
OFF-ROAD VEHICLE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703202
INTERNAL CONNECTION OF A BICYCLE REAR HUB
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700639
VEHICULAR BATTERY PACK AND RELATED ASSEMBLY METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691766
Work Vehicle
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692909
CLUTCH DEVICE
11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+11.7%)
1y 10m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 515 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month