Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/960,711

MOUNTING STRUCTURE FOR DRIVE SHAFT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 26, 2024
Priority
May 30, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0070475
Examiner
THOMPSON, KENNETH L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1029 granted / 1177 resolved
+27.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1193
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§102
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1177 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)1) as being anticipated by Edgar, U.S. 2,038,554. Regarding claim 1, Edgar discloses a mounting structure for a drive shaft assembly, which is configured to (or functional capable of) mount a drive shaft (fig 1, shaft 11; p. 1, right column, lines 9-18) assembly including an outer wheel (outside member 12) to a differential unit (any driven device for the hub of the gear), the mounting structure having a stem portion (portion at keys 15, 16 and top or outer faces a, bases b; p. 1, right column, lines 19-26) protruding from the outer wheel (outside member 12) and connected to the differential unit (any driven unit connectible to the hub and gear), the stem portion having a cut line (fig 2, interdental spaces 16) formed along an axial direction at a free end portion (fig 2, reduced threaded extension of stud 13); and a wedge stay (fig 4, inward keys projections or splines 17; p. 2, left column, lines 29-37) configured to be wedge-attachable along the axial direction of the stem portion on the cut line (p. 2, right column, lines 37-59). As to claim 2, the reference discloses a wedge handling unit (fig 1, nut 14; p. 2, right column, lines 37-42) mounted on the stem portion (distal end of shaft 11 at 15, 16, a, b) configured to engage the wedge stay (nut 14 pressure the projections 17 into the spaces 16; p. 2, right column, lines 60-66) on the cut line (spaces 16). As to claim 4, the reference discloses the cut line (interdental spaces 16) extends from the free end portion (threaded extension portion 13) of the stem portion to a predetermined section (axial end of the threaded extension 13 at the space 16) along the axial direction. Claims 1, 3, 4 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tsuzaki et al., U.S. 7,900,358. Regarding claim 1, Tsuzaki et al. discloses a mounting structure for a drive shaft assembly (fig 3, hub 1 and bearing 2; col. 4, lines 50-56) configured to mount a drive shaft (fig 3, collet chuck 3; col. 5, lines 40-58) assembly including an outer wheel (at hub 1) to a differential unit (col. 5, lines 14-24), the mounting structure having a stem portion (extent of collet chuck 3 at spline grooves 3e; col. 6, lines 2-11) protruding from the outer wheel and connected to the differential unit, the stem portion having a cut line (fig 2a; slits 30a; col. 5, lines 48-58) formed along an axial direction at a free end portion (fig 2a, end of collet chuck 3 opposite cone 4), and a wedge stay (cone 4; col. 6, lines 16-20) configured to be wedge-attachable along the axial direction of the stem portion on the cut line (slits 30a). As to claim 3, the reference discloses the stem portion is extended outward (col. 6, lines 20-35) by the wedge stay (cone 4) which is joined to the cut line; and a serration (fig 2b, spline grooves 3e; col. 5, line 59 – col. 6, line 10) formed on an exterior circumference surface of the stem portion which adheres to a side gear of the differential unit (col. 5, lines 14-24, spider gears are integrated in a differential). As to claim 4, the reference discloses the cut line (slits 30a) extends from the free end portion (distal end opposite cone 4) of the stem portion to a predetermined section (fig 3, cylindrical portion 3a; col. 5, lines 48-58) along the axial direction. As to claim 6, the reference discloses the stem portion (extent of collet chuck 3 having the spline grooves 3e) have a plurality of wedge deformable parts (fig 4B, separated parts 3c; col. 5, lines 50-58) cut along the axial direction by the cut line (slits 30a). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 7-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims; specifically, the limitations of the guide rail and wedge connection groove including the limitations of the base claim and intervening claims appear to be novel at this time. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KENNETH L THOMPSON whose telephone number is (571)272-7037. The examiner can normally be reached Weekdays; 9:00-5:00, est. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tara Schimpf can be reached at 571-270-7741. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 21 July 2026 /KENNETH L THOMPSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3676
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698705
DOWNHOLE FRACTURING ZONE DATA LOGGER AND DOWNHOLE FRACTURING ZONE DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM
1y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698687
TWO-STAGE MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION SCHEME FOR WELLBORE CLEANUP WITH AN EMISSIONS MEASURE
1y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12687246
SEALING DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS FOR OIL AND GAS APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12669020
COILED TUBING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GEOTHERMAL WELLS
1y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662910
Detecting Mineralization And Monitoring Greenhouse Gas Plume Location In Subterranean Formations
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1177 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month