Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/960,839

THREADED FASTENER

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Nov 26, 2024
Priority
Sep 13, 2017 — provisional 62/558,084 +4 more
Examiner
BYRD, EUGENE G
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
603 granted / 861 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
893
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
62.3%
+22.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 861 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-16 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-3 and 6-8 of U.S. Patent No. 11,719,272. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the present claims essentially the same limitations that include among other things a fastener comprising: a shank having a first end and a second end opposite the first end, the second end including a tip, the shank having a first longitudinal axis extending from the first end to the second end; at least one helical thread formation integrally connected to and extending outwardly from the shank, wherein the at least one helical thread formation is configured such that (a) when the fastener is rotated in a substrate in a first direction, the at least one helical thread formation causes the tightening of the fastener in the substrate, and (b) when the fastener is rotated in the substrate in an opposite second direction, the at least one helical thread formation causes the loosening of the fastener in the substrate; and a head integrally connected to the first end of the shank, the head including a top portion and a bottom portion, the top portion defining an engaging structure engageable by a tool, the bottom portion including a plurality of ribs, wherein each rib includes: (i) a leading face, and (ii) a trailing face that meets the leading face at a transversely extending leading edge of the rib, wherein the leading edge of the rib includes an apex at the outermost end point of the leading edge, and wherein for each rib, the rib is inwardly tapered, the trailing face of the rib does not extend to a leading face of an adjacent one of the ribs, the leading face of the rib, the leading edge of the rib, and the trailing face of the rib are configured such that when the fastener is rotated in the substrate in the first direction, the leading edge of the rib is engageable with the substrate before the trailing face of the rib. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EUGENE G BYRD whose telephone number is (571)270-1824. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Fulton can be reached at 5712727376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EUGENE G BYRD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12736135
SEALING SYSTEM FOR A ROTARY SHAFT WITH RADIALLY DIRECTED SEALING FORCES
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733634
CONDUIT PLUG FOR PROTECTING ELECTRICAL WIRES
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736133
WATERPROOF CASE ASSEMBLY STRUCTURE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729721
OBJECT HOLDING STRUCTURE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723681
A TRANSIT DEVICE FOR LEADING ONE OR MORE CABLES AND/OR PIPES THROUGH AN OPENING IN A PARTITION
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+9.4%)
2y 9m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 861 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month