Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/961,159

PROJECTION APPARATUS AND DISPLAY METHOD THEREOF, STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 26, 2024
Priority
Jun 01, 2022 — CN 202210622937.7 +2 more
Examiner
HOWARD, RYAN D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hisense Laser Display Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
825 granted / 1037 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1050
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1037 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an applications filed in China on 6/01/2022. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the CN202210623034.0 application or the CN202210622937.7 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sakai (US 2015/0062146 A1). Regarding claim 20, Sakai teaches a non-transitory computer readable storage medium (11, figure 1), having stored computer program instructions that, when the computer program instructions run on a computer (10, figure 1), make the computer to execute ne step in the display method of the projection apparatus according to claim 8 (only one of the method steps of claim 8 need to be executed in order to anticipate claim 20): Receive the image data output by the first controller (3, figure 1) and processing the output image data to generate the driving signal (for 5, figure 1), by the second controller (4, figure 1), so as to drive the light valve to modulate the incident beams. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Closest prior art, Sakai (US 2015/0062146 A1) teaches a light valve (6, figure 1) to modulate incident beams according to a driving signal so as to obtain projection beams, the projection beams being incident on a projection lens to project an image to be displayed, the image to be displayed being an entire image required to be displayed by the projection apparatus and including at least one of a first image (from 1, figure 1); A first controller (3, figure 1) configured to receive image data (from 1, 2, figure 1) and output the image data, the output image data including at least one of first data, the first data being used for displaying the first image, A second controller (4, figure 1) being connected to the first controller and the light valve, the second controller configured to receive the image data output by the first controller and process the output image data to generate the driving signal so as to drive the light valve to modulate the incident beams, Wherein the first controller is further configured to perform color gamut conversion on the first data (YCbCr-RGB, figure 1). Secondary prior art, Hu (CN 110413360 A) teaches a method of displaying a user interface and an image together, wherein the color space of the image is adjusted to be consistent with the color space of the user interface (see abstract). Sakai in view of Hu however does not teach that the first controller omits color gamut conversion of the second data while the second controller performs color gamut conversion on the second data so as to make the color gamut of the second image be the same the color gamut of the first image. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN D HOWARD whose telephone number is (571)270-5358. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minh-Toan Ton can be reached at 5712722303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN D HOWARD/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882 9/05/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12730369
PROJECTOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724285
SPECKLE-REDUCED ILLUMINATION FOR IMPROVED SCATTERING-BASED MICROSCOPY
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724335
PROJECTION DEVICE, PROJECTION CONTROL METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717223
ILLUMINATION DEVICE, METHOD OF CONTROLLING ILLUMINATION DEVICE, AND PROJECTION DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12720025
ELECTRONIC DEVICE, DEVICE MANAGEMENT SERVER, CONTROL METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR DEVICE MANAGEMENT SERVER
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+12.8%)
2y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1037 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month