Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/961,477

LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 27, 2024
Priority
Jan 28, 2021 — provisional 63/142,501 +2 more
Examiner
CHANG, CHARLES S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Innolux Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
807 granted / 1030 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1040
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
63.8%
+23.8% vs TC avg
§102
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1030 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 7-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US 20200350392). Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses (Figs. 1-12; in particular Fig. 6) a light emitting device, comprising: a substrate (100); and a plurality of sub-pixels (PU1-PU3) disposed on the substrate, the plurality of sub-pixels comprising a first sub-pixel (SP1 of PU1) of a first color (red) (section 0163), a second sub-pixel (SP2 of PU1) of a second color (green) different from the first color, and a third sub-pixel (SP2 of PU2) of the second color (green), wherein the first sub-pixel (SP1 of PU1) is disposed adjacent to the second sub-pixel (SP2 of PU1), and the first sub-pixel (SP1 of PU1) is disposed adjacent to the third sub-pixel (SP2 of PU2), and wherein a width of the second sub-pixel (SP2 of PU1) along a first direction (X direction) is different from a width of the third sub-pixel (SP2 of PU2) along the first direction (X direction). Regarding claim 2, Lee discloses (Figs. 1-12; in particular Figs. 6-7) a first extension direction (X direction) of a connection line (SL1b) connecting a center of the first sub-pixel (SP1 of PU1) and a center of the second sub-pixel (SP2 of PU1), and a second extension direction (Y direction) of a connection line (V1, V2) connecting the center of the first sub-pixel (SP1 of PU1) and a center of the third sub-pixel (SP2 of PU1) are different. Regarding claim 3, Lee discloses (Figs. 1-12; in particular Fig. 6) the plurality of sub-pixels further comprises a fourth sub-pixel (SP1 of PU2) of the first color (red) and disposed adjacent to the third sub-pixel (SP2 of PU2), a width of the first sub-pixel (SP1 of PU1) along the first direction (X direction) and a width of the fourth sub-pixel (SP1 of PU2) along the first direction are different. Regarding claim 7, Lee discloses (Figs. 1-12; in particular Fig. 6) the plurality of sub-pixels further comprises a fifth sub-pixel (SP3 of PU1) of a third color (blue) disposed adjacent to the first sub-pixel (SP1 of PU1), and a sixth sub-pixel (SP3 of PU2) of the third color disposed adjacent to the fourth sub-pixel (SP1 of PU2), and wherein the third color (blue) is different from the first color (red) and different from the second color (green). Regarding claim 8, Lee discloses (Figs. 1-12; in particular Figs. 6-7) a third extension direction of a connection line (SL1b) connecting the center of the first sub-pixel and a center of the fifth sub-pixel, and a fourth extension direction of a connection line (V1, V2) connecting a center of the fourth sub-pixel and a center of the sixth sub-pixel are different. Regarding claim 9, Lee discloses (Figs. 1-12; in particular Figs. 6-7) the first sub-pixel comprises an organic light emitting diode of the first color, the second sub-pixel comprises an organic light emitting diode of the second color, and the fifth sub-pixel comprises an organic light emitting diode of the third color (sections 0068, 0163). Regarding claim 10, Lee discloses (Figs. 1-12; in particular Figs. 6-7) the first color is green, blue, or red, the second color is green, blue, or red, and the third color is green, blue, or red (section 0163). Regarding claim 11, Lee discloses (Figs. 1-12; in particular Figs. 6-7) the first color is green, the second color is blue, and the third color is red (section 0163; dependent on a particular sub-pixel designation). Regarding claim 12, Lee discloses (Figs. 1-12; in particular Figs. 6-7) the first sub-pixel comprises an organic light emitting diode of the first color, the second sub-pixel comprises an organic light emitting diode of the second color (sections 0068, 0163). Regarding claim 13, Lee discloses (Figs. 1-12; in particular Figs. 6-7) the first color is green, blue, or red, and the second color is green, blue, or red (section 0163). Regarding claim 14, Lee discloses (Figs. 1-12; in particular Figs. 6-7) the first color is green, and the second color is blue (section 0163; dependent on a particular sub-pixel designation). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 and 15-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the prior art does not disclose or suggest the light emitting device of claims 4-6, in particular the limitations of in a top view, the first sub-pixel and the fourth sub-pixel have different geometric shapes. The prior art does not disclose or suggest the light emitting device of claims 15-17, in particular the limitations of in a top view, the second sub-pixel and the third sub-pixel have different geometric shapes. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES S CHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-5024. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Caley can be reached at (571) 272-2286. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLES S CHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746740
PROJECTION ARRANGEMENT COMPRISING A COMPOSITE PANE AND P-POLARIZED RADIATION
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749869
BROADENED SPECTRUM LASER DIODE FOR DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736716
METALENS ARRAY AND DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724232
COUPLE-IN LENS ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717204
ELECTRONIC PAPER DISPLAY AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+17.7%)
2y 8m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1030 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month