Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/961,828

SWITCHED-MODE POWER SUPPLY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 27, 2024
Priority
Nov 29, 2023 — CN 202323241429.3
Examiner
DE LEON DOMENECH, RAFAEL O
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Anker Innovations Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
434 granted / 494 resolved
+27.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
498
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
60.6%
+20.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 494 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is in response to the application filed on November 27, 2024. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on October 06, 2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings were filed on November 27, 2024. These drawings are accepted by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chuang (U.S. Pat. No. 11,463,082 B2, reference provided as part of the Information Disclosure Statement “IDS”). In re claim 1, Chaung discloses (Fig. 7) a driving circuit (700) for a switching device (10), comprising: a pulse width modulation circuit (110) comprising an input terminal and an output terminal; and a resistor-capacitor series circuit (R2, C1) comprising an input terminal (N1) and an output terminal (N2), wherein: the output terminal of the pulse width modulation circuit (110) is connected to an input terminal of the resistor-capacitor series circuit, the output terminal of the resistor-capacitor series circuit is connected to a control terminal of the switching device (10), the pulse width modulation circuit is configured to output a level pulse signal for turning on the switching device, and the resistor-capacitor series circuit is configured to reduce an edge slope of the level pulse signal (Col. 10, lines 14-55). In re claim 2, Chaung discloses (Fig. 7) wherein: the resistor-capacitor series circuit (R2, C1) comprises a first resistor (R2) and a first capacitor (C1), a first terminal of the first resistor is connected to the output terminal of the pulse width modulation circuit (110), a second terminal of the first resistor is connected to a first terminal of the first capacitor (right side terminal of R2 is connected to C1), and a second terminal of the first capacitor is connected to the control terminal of the switching device (right side terminal of C1 is connected to the control terminal of 10). In re claim 3, Chaung discloses (Fig. 7) further comprising a waveform conversion circuit comprising a second resistor (R1), wherein the second resistor is connected in parallel to the first resistor and the first capacitor (R1 is in parallel with R2 and C1). In re claim 7, Chaung discloses (Fig. 7) wherein the input terminal of the pulse width modulation circuit is connected to an external power supply device (VH, VL). In re claim 8, Chaung discloses (Fig. 7) wherein: an output terminal of the switching device is connected to a voltage stabilizing input device (UC), and a ground terminal of the pulse width modulation circuit and an input terminal of the switching device are connected to a ground node (Col. 10, lines 14-55). In re claim 9, Chaung discloses (Fig. 7) wherein the switching device comprises one of a metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET), a junction field-effect transistor (JFET), or an insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) (10 is a MOSFET). In re claim 10, Chaung discloses wherein the control terminal comprises a gate (Fig. 7). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding to claim 4, the prior art of record fails to disclose or suggest “a discharge circuit connected in parallel to the first resistor” in combination with other limitations of the claim. Claims 5-6 depend directly or indirectly from claim 4 and are, therefore, also objected at least for the same reasons set above. Claims 11-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding to claim 11, the prior art of record fails to disclose or suggest “a discharge circuit connected in parallel to the first resistor” in combination with other limitations of the claim. Claims 12-20 depend directly or indirectly from claim 11 and are, therefore, also allowable at least for the same reasons set above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAFAEL O. DE LEÓN DOMENECH whose telephone number is (571)270-0517. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 a.m. -5:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hammond Crystal can be reached at (571) 270-1682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAFAEL O DE LEON DOMENECH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683499
CONTROL DEVICE FOR A SWITCHING VOLTAGE REGULATOR AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683504
MULTI-PHASE CIRCUIT CONTROL METHOD AND POWER CONVERSION DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676541
INTERLEAVED FLYING CAPACITOR MULTI-LEVEL CONVERTER AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671350
POWER CONVERSION DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671337
CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SWITCHING VOLTAGE REGULATOR
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 494 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month