Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/962,121

MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 27, 2024
Priority
Dec 26, 2023 — JP 2023-219742 +1 more
Examiner
FERGUSON, DION
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
TDK Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
879 granted / 1012 resolved
+26.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1033
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
77.0%
+37.0% vs TC avg
§102
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1012 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yao (US 9,530,564). With respect to claim 1, Yao discloses a multilayer ceramic electronic device (see abstract) comprising: an element body (see FIG. 1, element 1) comprising a dielectric layer and an electrode layer being laminated (see FIG. 1, dielectric layers 6a-6g and electrodes 2a-2f, and col. 6, lines 39-55), wherein the dielectric layer comprises a main component represented by a formula ABO3, where A comprises only Ba or comprises Ba and at least one selected from the group consisting of Ca and Sr (see col. 4, lines 28-35), and B comprises only Ti or comprises Ti and at least one selected from the group consisting of Zr and Hf (see col. 4, lines 28-35); the dielectric layer comprises 0.05 mol or more and 0.25 mol or less Mn oxide in terms of MnO (see col. 6, lines 21-33), 1.00 mol or more and 2.50 mol or less Mg oxide in terms of MgO (see col. 6, lines 21-33), 0.50 mol or more and 1.50 mol or less R oxide in terms of R2O3, where R comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of Y, Dy, Ho, Yb, Lu, Gd, and Tb (see col. 6, lines 12-16 and 21-33), and 0.05 mol or more and 0.45 mol or less Zr oxide in terms of ZrO2 (see col. 6, lines 21-33), with respect to 100 mol of the main component; the dielectric layer further comprises V (see col. 6, lines 21-33); and the dielectric layer has a Zr/V ratio of 2.00 or more and 4.00 or less in atomic ratio (see Table 3, at least sample 42, noting 0.4 of Zr/.15 of V = 2.67). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 3 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: with respect to claim 2, the prior art fails to teach the Si oxide range when taken in conjunction with the limitations of the base claim. With respect to claim 3, the prior art fails to teach the formation of a segregate comprising Mg and Si at an interface between the electrode layer and the dielectric layer, when taken in conjunction with the limitations of the base claim. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Arai et al. (US 2023/0282423), Guo et al. (US 2022/0234958), and Iguchi (US 2019/0304964) each disclose a ceramic including Zr and V, but fails to identify the claimed relationship between them. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DION R FERGUSON whose telephone number is (571)270-7566. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 5:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole, can be reached at 571-272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DION R. FERGUSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683125
VARIABLE CAPACITOR ARRAY FOR RF IMPEDANCE MATCHING NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683079
MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITOR
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683091
CAPACITOR AND METHOD OF FORMING A CAPACITOR
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683092
METHOD FOR FORMING MOLYBDENUM CARBIDE-CONTAINING NANOCOMPOSITE ELECTRODE
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676265
SOLID-STATE ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR ELEMENT AND SOLID-STATE ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+8.3%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1012 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month