Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/962,516

CONTROLLER AREA NETWORK (CAN) TRANSCEIVER, CAN DEVICE, CAN SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR THE CAN TRANSCEIVER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 27, 2024
Priority
Dec 14, 2023 — EU 23216772.6
Examiner
YU, HENRY W
Art Unit
2181
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Nxp B V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
388 granted / 562 resolved
+14.0% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
586
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
88.6%
+48.6% vs TC avg
§102
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 562 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The instant application having Application No. 18/962,516 has a total of 18 claims pending in the application; there are 2 independent claim and 16 dependent claims, all of which are ready for examination by the examiner. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). INFORMATION CONCERNING DRAWINGS Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they include the following reference character(s) not mentioned in the description: 122 in FIG. 1. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d), or amendment to the specification to add the reference character(s) in the description in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(b) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SPECIFICATION Specification The applicant’s specification submitted is acceptable for examination purposes. REJECTIONS BASED ON PRIOR ART Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 16-17, 21-29, and 33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Muth (Publication Number US 2021/0224079 A1). As per claim 16, Muth discloses “A Controller Area Network, CAN, transceiver, comprising: a transmit data, TXD, interface, a receive data, RXD, interface, a bus interface for coupling to a CAN bus, a receiver unit, a transmitter unit (the CAN transceiver 108 comprises a transmitter unit 110 and a receiver unit 112. The transmitter unit 110 has an input coupled to the transmit input 118 of the CAN transceiver 108 and outputs connected to the CAN bus terminal 122 of the CAN transceiver 108; Paragraph 0052), and a wake-up unit, wherein the bus interface is configured to receive a bus signal, from the CAN bus via the bus interface (providing a wake-up indication to the CAN controller based on the signal matching a predetermined pattern of one or more periods in which the signal is less than or equal to the negative threshold level; Paragraphs 0031-0034), wherein the bus signal is a differential voltage signal (the CAN bus 104 comprises two signal lines for communicating a differential signal between the plurality of CAN devices 102a-d; Paragraph 0049), wherein the wake-up unit is configured to detect, based on the bus signal, a silent section of the bus signal representing one or both of an end-of-frame, EOF, field of a first CAN frame and an inter-mission-space, ITM, following to the EOF field, wherein the wake-up unit is configured to detect, in the silent section of the bus signal, at least one wake-up pulse having a differential bus voltage that is less than a first predefined negative threshold voltage (the new physical bus levels (negative differential) introduced by the CAN XL Physical Layer may be used for wake-up management, besides other features. A negative CAN bus level, known as “level1” in CAN XL terminology, may be combined with a period, or in effect signal pattern, as a global wake-up trigger in the CAN XL bus system. Normal CAN or CAN FD traffic does not trigger the wake-up because these protocols and physical layers do not use negative differential voltage bus levels; Paragraph 0070), and wherein the wake-up unit is configured to cause a wake-up signal representing a wake-up instruction to be sent via an interface of the transceiver in response to the at least one detected wake-up pulse (see the exceptional signal providing the wake-up notification that may be positioned within a CAN XL frame in the ‘End of Frame’ CAN phase; Paragraph 0079).” As per claim 17, Muth discloses “The CAN transceiver of claim 16 (as disclosed by Muth above), wherein the wake-up unit is configured to detect, based on the bus signal, a trigger pulse having a differential bus voltage that is greater than a positive, predefined second threshold voltage (whether the differential signal on the CAN bus V.sub.CAN is greater than or equal to the third threshold level (input=0?); Paragraph 0105), wherein the wake-up unit is configured to wait for a predefined waiting time, that follows the trigger pulse (a period of time such as the first period (time_1); Paragraph 0105), wherein the wake-up unit is configured to detect, based on the bus signal, a base section of the bus signal (testing the condition compared to a threshold; Paragraphs 0104-0105), wherein the base section having a differential bus voltage between the first threshold voltage and the second threshold voltage during a predefined base time following the waiting time (example is the state machine tests the condition 1008 whether the differential signal on the CAN bus V.sub.CAN is greater than or equal to the third threshold level (input=0?) and continues the measurement 1006 of the first period (time_1); Paragraph 0105), wherein the wake-up unit is configured to detect, based on the bus signal, an observation section of the bus signal, wherein the observation section has a differential bus voltage that is less than the second threshold voltage during a predefined observation time following the base time (at time_0; Paragraph 0105), wherein the observation section forms at least a part of the silent section (input=0; Paragraph 0105), and wherein the wake-up unit is configured to detect, in the observation section of the bus signal, at least one wake-up pulse having a differential bus voltage that is less than the first threshold voltage (where the threshold level is met; Paragraph 0105).” As per claim 25, Muth discloses “The CAN transceiver of claim 16 (as disclosed by Muth above), wherein the wake-up unit is configured to detect a first section of the bus signal representing at least one of a Start-of-frame field, SOF, an arbitration field, or a control field of the first CAN frame (an example is the CAN XL exceptional symbol; FIG. 7), wherein the wake-up unit is configured to detect a reference pattern, being represented by the first section of the bus signal, and wherein the wake-up unit is configured to cause the wake-up signal only in response to detection of the reference pattern (Abstract, lines 4-8).” As per claim 26, Muth discloses “The CAN transceiver of claim 16 (as disclosed by Muth above), wherein the CAN transceiver, in response to being activated, is configured to receive, via an interface of the transceiver other than the bus interface, a control instruction to send out a wake-up pattern, wherein the CAN transceiver is configured to receive a second CAN frame, via the TXD interface, and wherein the CAN transceiver is configured to transmit an output signal via the bus interface, such that the output signal represents the second CAN frame modified to include at least one wake-up pulse in an instruction section of the output signal representing the EOF, the ITM, or both of the CAN frame, wherein the at least one wake- up pulse has a differential bus voltage less than the first threshold voltage (where the threshold level is met [Paragraph 0105]. See also [Abstract, lines 4-8]).” As per claim 27, Muth discloses “A CAN device comprising: a CAN transceiver of claim 16 (as disclosed by Muth above), and a CAN controller, wherein the CAN controller is coupled to the TXD interface of the CAN transceiver and the RXD interface of the CAN transceiver (the CAN transceiver 108 comprises a transmitter unit 110 and a receiver unit 112. The transmitter unit 110 has an input coupled to the transmit input 118 of the CAN transceiver 108 and outputs connected to the CAN bus terminal 122 of the CAN transceiver 108; Paragraph 0052), wherein the wake-up unit of the CAN transceiver is configured, in response to the detected wake-up pulse or the detected wake-up pattern, to cause the wake-up signal to be sent to the CAN controller via the RXD interface or another interface of the CAN transceiver, and wherein the CAN controller is configured to change from an inactive state to an operating state in response to the received wake-up signal (Abstract, lines 4-8).” As per claims 21 and 33, Muth discloses “The CAN transceiver of claim 16 (as disclosed by Muth above), wherein the wake-up unit is configured to detect, in the silent section, a predefined wake-up pattern comprising a plurality of wake-up pulses each having a differential bus voltage that is less than the first predefined negative threshold voltage, and wherein the wake-up unit is configured to cause the wake-up signal representing a wake-up instruction to be sent in response to the detected wake-up pattern (FIG. 2, 9, and 10).” As per claim 22, Muth discloses “The CAN transceiver of claim 16 (as disclosed by Muth above), wherein the wake-up unit is coupled to the receiver unit, the RXD interface or both to cause the sending of the wake-up signal (FIG. 3).” As per claim 23, Muth discloses “The CAN transceiver of claim 16 (as disclosed by Muth above), wherein one or both of the CAN transceiver and the receiver unit are configured to treat a wake-up pulse as a recessive bit (FIG. 2, 9, and 10).” As per claim 24, Muth discloses “The CAN transceiver of claim 16 (as disclosed by Muth above), wherein wake-up unit is configured to control the receiver unit such that the receiver unit generates a signal at the RXD interface representing a recessive bit based on the wake-up pulse (FIG. 2, 9, and 10).” As per claim 28, Muth discloses “A method for a CAN transceiver comprising a transmit data, TXD, interface, a receive data, RXD, interface, a bus interface for coupling to a CAN bus, a receiver unit, a transmitter unit, and a wake-up unit (the CAN transceiver 108 comprises a transmitter unit 110 and a receiver unit 112. The transmitter unit 110 has an input coupled to the transmit input 118 of the CAN transceiver 108 and outputs connected to the CAN bus terminal 122 of the CAN transceiver 108; Paragraph 0052), wherein the method comprises the steps of: a) receiving a bus signal at the bus interface, wherein the bus signal is a differential voltage signal (the CAN bus 104 comprises two signal lines for communicating a differential signal between the plurality of CAN devices 102a-d; Paragraph 0049).” Muth discloses “b) detecting, by the wake-up unit, a silent section of the bus signal representing an end-of-frame, EOF, field of a CAN frame, an inter-mission-space, ITM, following to the EOF field, or both, based on the bus signal (the new physical bus levels (negative differential) introduced by the CAN XL Physical Layer may be used for wake-up management, besides other features. A negative CAN bus level, known as “level1” in CAN XL terminology, may be combined with a period, or in effect signal pattern, as a global wake-up trigger in the CAN XL bus system. Normal CAN or CAN FD traffic does not trigger the wake-up because these protocols and physical layers do not use negative differential voltage bus levels; Paragraph 0070).” Muth discloses “c) detecting, by the wake-up unit, at least one wake-up pulse in the silent section of the bus signal, the at least one wake-up pulse having a differential bus voltage that is less than a predefined negative first threshold voltage (the new physical bus levels (negative differential) introduced by the CAN XL Physical Layer may be used for wake-up management, besides other features. A negative CAN bus level, known as “level1” in CAN XL terminology, may be combined with a period, or in effect signal pattern, as a global wake-up trigger in the CAN XL bus system. Normal CAN or CAN FD traffic does not trigger the wake-up because these protocols and physical layers do not use negative differential voltage bus levels; Paragraph 0070).” Muth discloses “and d) causing, by the wake-up unit, a wake-up signal representing a wake-up instruction to be sent via an interface of the transceiver in response to the at least one detected wake-up pulse (see the exceptional signal providing the wake-up notification that may be positioned within a CAN XL frame in the ‘End of Frame’ CAN phase; Paragraph 0079).” As per claim 29, Muth discloses “The method of claim 28 (as disclosed by Muth above), wherein the method further comprising steps of: detecting, by the wake-up unit based on the bus signal, a trigger pulse having a differential bus voltage that is greater than a positive, predefined second threshold voltage (whether the differential signal on the CAN bus V.sub.CAN is greater than or equal to the third threshold level (input=0?); Paragraph 0105).” Muth discloses “waiting, by the wake-up unit for a predefined waiting time that follows the trigger pulse (a period of time such as the first period (time_1); Paragraph 0105).” Muth discloses “detecting, by the wake-up unit based on the bus signal, a base section of the bus signal, wherein the base section has a differential bus voltage that is between the first threshold voltage and the second threshold voltage during a predefined base time following the waiting time (example is the state machine tests the condition 1008 whether the differential signal on the CAN bus V.sub.CAN is greater than or equal to the third threshold level (input=0?) and continues the measurement 1006 of the first period (time_1); Paragraph 0105).” Muth discloses “detecting, by the wake-up unit based on the bus signal, an observation section of the bus signal, wherein the observation section has a differential bus voltage Page 6 of 8that is less than the second threshold voltage during a predefined observation time following the base time (at time_0; Paragraph 0105), wherein the observation section forms at least a part of the silent section (input=0; Paragraph 0105).” Muth discloses “and detecting, by the wake-up unit, at least one wake-up pulse in the observation section of the bus signal, the at least one wake-up pulse having a differential bus voltage that is less than the first threshold voltage (where the threshold level is met; Paragraph 0105).” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 18-20 and 30-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Muth (Publication Number US 2021/0224079 A1) in view of the “International Standard ISO 11898-2 – Road vehicles – Controller area network (CAN)” (2016) (henceforth CAN ISO). As per claims 18 and 30, Muth discloses “The CAN transceiver of claim 17 (as disclosed by Muth above).” However, Muth does not disclose the exact timing as disclosed in the limitation “wherein the waiting time is between 0.01 µs and 2 µs, in particular between 0.1 µs and 1.18 µs, wherein the base time is between 2 and 7 times a cycle time according to a predefined bit frequency at the bus interface, or wherein the observation time is between 5 and 7 times the cycle time according to the predefined bit frequency at the bus interface.” CAN ISO discloses the timing as disclosed in the limitations “wherein the waiting time is between 0.01 µs and 2 µs, in particular between 0.1 µs and 1.18 µs, wherein the base time is between 2 and 7 times a cycle time according to a predefined bit frequency at the bus interface, or wherein the observation time is between 5 and 7 times the cycle time according to the predefined bit frequency at the bus interface (bus biasing control timings can be between 0.5 µs and 5.0 µs (for CAN activity filter time, long) and between 0.15 µs and 1.8 µs (for CAN activity filter time, short); Page 20, table 20).” Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to combine the elements of Muth with elements of CAN ISO as both prior arts disclose the use of CAN, which is a known bus protocol in the arts with CAN ISO further disclosing the basic features and standards of the CAN bus. As per claims 19 and 31, CAN ISO discloses “The CAN transceiver of claim 18 (as disclosed by Muth and CAN ISO above), wherein the second threshold voltage is between plus 0.5 volts and plus 0.9 volts (Page 10).” As per claims 20 and 32, Muth discloses “The CAN transceiver of claim 16 (as disclosed by Muth above).” However, Muth does not disclose the exact voltage range as disclosed in the limitation “wherein the first threshold voltage is between minus 0.25 volts and minus 0.45 volts.” CAN ISO disclose the exact voltage range as disclosed in the limitation “wherein the first threshold voltage is between minus 0.25 volts and minus 0.45 volts (Page12, table 15).” Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to combine the elements of Muth with elements of CAN ISO as both prior arts disclose the use of CAN, which is a known bus protocol in the arts with CAN ISO further disclosing the basic features and standards of the CAN bus. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REFERENCES CITED BY APPLICANT As required by M.P.E.P. 609(c), the applicant's submission of the Information Disclosure Statement dated November 27, 2024, is acknowledged by the examiner and the cited references have been considered in the examination of the claims now pending. As required by M.P.E.P 609 C(2), a copy of the PTOL-1449 initialed and dated by the examiner is attached to the instant office action. RELEVENT ART CITED BY THE EXAMINER The following prior art made of record and relied upon is citied to establish the level of skill in the applicant’s art and those arts considered reasonably pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. See MPEP 707.05(c). The following references teach CAN bus and wake-up signals. U.S. PATENT NUMBERS:2019/0385057 A1 – [Paragraphs 00256 and 0115] 2020/0267018 A1 – [Paragraph 0021] 6,747,498 B1 – [Abstract] CLOSING COMMENTS Conclusion The examiner requests, in response to this Office action, support be shown for language added to any original claims on amendment and any new claims. That is, indicate support for newly added claim language by specifically pointing to page(s) and line no(s) in the specification and/or drawing figure(s). This will assist the examiner in prosecuting the application. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Henry Yu whose telephone number is (571)272-9779. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, IDRISS ALROBAYE can be reached at (571) 270-1023. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /H.W.Y/Examiner, Art Unit 2181 March 20, 2026 /IDRISS N ALROBAYE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2181
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12613825
PARALLEL RAS CHANNELS IN CXL MEMORY DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12608330
INDIVIDUAL POWER CYCLE CONTROL OF ACCELERATOR MODULES CONFIGURED ON A NODE
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12579079
ACCESSING A SECONDARY SHARED RESOURCE USING VIRTUAL IDENTIFIERS
2y 0m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12561271
COMPUTING SYSTEMS HAVING CONGESTION MONITORS THEREIN AND METHODS OF CONTROLLING OPERATION OF SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12554615
DETERMINING A QUIESCE TIMEOUT FOR A CONTAINERIZED WORKLOAD
3y 0m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+29.1%)
3y 0m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 562 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month