Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/963,018

ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE REFLECTING DEVICE, ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE REFLECTING FENCE, AND REFLECTION PANEL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 27, 2024
Examiner
LOTTER, DAVID E
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Agc Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
493 granted / 584 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
605
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 584 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/27/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Interpretation Examiner’s note - Regarding the recitation that an element is ‘configured to’ perform a function, it is the position of the office that such limitations are not positive structural limitations, and thus, only require the ability to so perform. In this case the prior art applied herein is construed as at least possessing such ability. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 7 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kambara (US 2023/0010669) in view of Suh (US 2012/0113502). Regarding claim 1 Kambara discloses an electromagnetic wave reflecting device, comprising: a reflection panel (e.g., Figs. 3A-7, at 13) configured to reflect radio waves of a desired band selected from a frequency band between 1 GHZ and 170 GHz (e.g., Abstract, paragraph 0009); and a frame (e.g., Figs. 3A-7, at 11) configured to hold the reflection panel, wherein the reflection panel includes a dielectric layer (e.g., Figs. 3A-7, at 132), a conductive pattern (e.g., Figs. 3A-7, at 102) periodically provided on one surface of the dielectric layer, a ground layer (e.g., Figs. 3A-7, at 131) provided on the other surface of the dielectric layer. Kambara does not disclose an adhesive layer configured to bond the conductive pattern to the one surface of the dielectric layer, and a gap is provided in the adhesive layer. Suh discloses an adhesive layer (e.g., Figs. 1-4, at 30) configured to bond the conductive pattern to the one surface of the dielectric layer, and a gap is provided in the adhesive layer (e.g., Figs.3A-3D, at 30). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the device disclosed by Kambara in accordance with the teaching of Suh regarding the use of an adhesive layer in order to bond the respective layers (Suh, paragraph 0065). Regarding claim 7 Kambara further discloses an electromagnetic wave reflecting fence, wherein a plurality of the electromagnetic wave reflecting devices each being the electromagnetic wave reflecting device of claim 1 are joined by the frame (e.g., Fig. 7, at 10-1 and 10-2 and 11). Regarding claim 9 Kambara discloses a reflection panel (e.g., Figs. 3A-7, at 13), comprising: a dielectric layer (e.g., Figs. 3A-7, at 132); a conductive pattern (e.g., Figs. 3A-7, at 102) periodically provided on one surface of the dielectric layer; a ground layer (e.g., Figs. 3A-7, at 131) provided on another surface of the dielectric layer. Kambara does not disclose an adhesive layer configured to bond the conductive pattern to the one surface of the dielectric layer, wherein a gap is provided in the adhesive layer. Suh discloses an adhesive layer configured to bond the conductive pattern to the one surface of the dielectric layer, wherein a gap (e.g., Figs.3A-3D, at 30) is provided in the adhesive layer. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the device disclosed by Kambara in accordance with the teaching of Suh regarding the use of an adhesive layer in order to bond the respective layers (Suh, paragraph 0065). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6 and 8 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding dependent claim 2, patentability exists, at least in part, with the claimed features of wherein a thickness of the adhesive layer is 0.002 mm or more and 0.05 mm or less, and an occupancy of the adhesive layer with respect to the dielectric layer is 9.0% or more and 50.0% or less. Kambara and Suh are both cited as teaching some elements of the claimed invention including a an electromagnetic wave reflecting device having a reflection panel, a frame, a dielectric layer, and an adhesive. However, the prior art, when taken alone, or, in combination, cannot be construed as reasonably teaching or suggesting all of the elements of the claimed invention as arranged, disposed, or provided in the manner as claimed by the Applicant. Regarding dependent claim 5, patentability exists, at least in part, with the claimed features of an intermediate layer covering the adhesive layer and the conductive pattern, wherein the intermediate layer fills at least a part of the gap of the adhesive layer. Kambara and Suh are both cited as teaching some elements of the claimed invention including a an electromagnetic wave reflecting device having a reflection panel, a frame, a dielectric layer, and an adhesive. However, the prior art, when taken alone, or, in combination, cannot be construed as reasonably teaching or suggesting all of the elements of the claimed invention as arranged, disposed, or provided in the manner as claimed by the Applicant. Regarding dependent claim 7, patentability exists, at least in part, with the claimed features of wherein a plurality of the electromagnetic wave reflecting devices each being the electromagnetic wave reflecting device of claim 1 are joined by the frame. Kambara and Suh are both cited as teaching some elements of the claimed invention including a an electromagnetic wave reflecting device having a reflection panel, a frame, a dielectric layer, and an adhesive. However, the prior art, when taken alone, or, in combination, cannot be construed as reasonably teaching or suggesting all of the elements of the claimed invention as arranged, disposed, or provided in the manner as claimed by the Applicant. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The International Search Report disclosed by Applicant contains additional references and analysis considered highly relevant to the current application. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID E LOTTER whose telephone number is (571)270-7422. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dameon Levi can be reached at 571-272-2105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DAVID E. LOTTER Primary Examiner Art Unit 2845 /DAVID E LOTTER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597705
SPACE-WAVE PHASE-SHIFTING ARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597701
BASE STATION ANTENNAS HAVING F-STYLE ARRAYS THAT GENERATE ANTENNA BEAMS HAVING NARROWED AZIMUTH BEAMWIDTHS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596143
OVER THE AIR (OTA) TESTING OF AN ANTENNA IN PACKAGE (AIP) DEVICE IN RADIATING NEAR FIELD USING A CHARACTERIZING DEVICE AND AUTOMATED TEST EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597707
ANTENNA MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592475
ANTENNA STRUCTURE AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.4%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 584 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month