Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/963,159

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Nov 27, 2024
Examiner
HEREDIA OCASIO, ARLENE J
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
391 granted / 522 resolved
+6.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
554
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.0%
+5.0% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 522 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, “the sheet bonding member (Ohata:37) is formed integrally with the regulation member” must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification ABSTRACT - The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it merely consists of a single run-on sentence without regard for proper grammatical form. Correction is required. See MPEP § 608.01(b). TITLE - The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. JUMBO CASE - The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Independent claims 1 and 11 recite inter alia, “a region below a contact position where the sheet is in contact with the photosensitive body in a gravity direction”. From this recitation it is unclear is the region is “below in a gravity direction” or if the sheet is “in contact with the photosensitive body in a gravity direction”, as alternatively interpreted. For the purpose of examination over prior art, this limitation is interpreted as “a region below, in a gravity direction, a contact position where the sheet is in contact with the photosensitive body”. Claim 11 recites the limitations “an arrival position on most downstream of the contact position”. The phrase “on most downstream” is unclear. For the purpose of examination over prior art, this limitation is interpreted as best construe. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 8, and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 10,156,814 to Ohata in view of US 7,738,807 to Inada et al. and JP 09054494 A to Kitagawa. Regarding claim 1, Ohata discloses an image forming apparatus (100), comprising: a rotatable photosensitive body (1); an exposure device (5) configured to expose the photosensitive body to form an electrostatic latent image on the photosensitive body (col. 4 lines 15-19); a developing device (3) including a developing container (20) configured to house a developer containing toner and carriers, and a developer bearing member (31) configured to bear and convey the developer to a development position where the electrostatic latent image formed on the photosensitive body by the exposure device is developed (col. 5 lines 1-11); a cleaning member (7) provided in contact with the photosensitive body and configured to clean the photosensitive body (col. 5 lines 59-62); a driving unit (inherent) configured to rotate and drive the photosensitive body in a first rotation direction during development operation in which the developing device develops the electrostatic latent image formed on the photosensitive body (col. 5 lines 49-57); a control unit (inherent, not shown) configured to control the driving unit; and a sheet (39, Fig.3) provided in contact with the photosensitive body at a position on a downstream of a position where the cleaning member is in contact with the photosensitive body and on an upstream of the development position in the first rotation direction (col. 7 lines 15-24). Ohata further teaches a mode in which the supply roller is rotated in a second rotation direction opposite to the first rotation direction, during non-development operation in which the development operation is not performed. In the second mode, floating toner particles accumulate around a regulation blade is collected and returned to the developing container. However, Ohata is silent about driving the photosensitive body in a second rotation direction opposite to the first rotation direction and does not explicitly recite a collection portion, as claimed. Inada discloses an image forming apparatus (1, Fig.1), comprising: a rotatable photosensitive body (3); an exposure device (5) configured to expose the photosensitive body to form an electrostatic latent image on the photosensitive body; a developing device (6) including a developing container configured to house a developer and a developer bearing member configured to bear and convey the developer to a development position where the electrostatic latent image formed on the photosensitive body by the exposure device is developed; a cleaning member (81) provided in contact with the photosensitive body and configured to clean the photosensitive body; a driving unit (9) configured to rotate and drive the photosensitive body in a first rotation direction (i.e., positive rotation) during development operation in which the developing device develops the electrostatic latent image formed on the photosensitive body; and a control unit (100) configured to perform a mode for controlling the driving unit to rotate and drive the photosensitive body in a second rotation direction (i.e., reverse rotation) opposite to the first rotation direction, during non-development operation in which the development operation is not performed. The optimum values of a rotation amount of the photosensitive body are determined such that foreign objects as paper powder that remain under the cleaning blade edge can be removed effectively and the inverse warpage of the blade does not occur (col. 8 lines 28-38). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Ohata and Inada such that in the image forming apparatus of Ohata the control unit is configured to perform a mode for controlling the driving unit to rotate and drive the photosensitive body in a second rotation direction opposite to the first rotation direction, during non-development operation in which the development operation is not performed; for at least the purpose of removing accumulated developer from the cleaning member thus ensuring cleaning performance. Kitagawa discloses an image forming apparatus (Fig.1), comprising: a rotatable photosensitive body (1); a developing device (40) including a developer bearing member; the lower portion of the housing of the developing device is extended to form a collection portion (490, Fig.9) that captures leaked toner and is provided to face the photosensitive body in a non-contact manner in a region below a position at which a seal member (500) faces the photosensitive body, in a gravity direction. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify the apparatus of Ohata such that the sleeve cover 37 is configured as a collection portion provided to face the photosensitive body in a non-contact manner in a region below a contact position where the sheet is in contact with the photosensitive body in a gravity direction and between the contact position and an arrival position when the photosensitive body is rotated and driven in the second rotation direction with the contact position as a starting point in the mode in a horizontal direction, for at least the purpose of collecting toner separated at the contact position and falling down, to prevent deterioration of image quality. The combination above further renders obvious: (claim 8) The image forming apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the collection portion is provided over a substantially entire region of a maximum image region where an image is formable on the photosensitive body, in a rotation axis direction of the photosensitive body (Ohata #37 and Kitagawa #490 extend in the axial direction). (claim 10) The image forming apparatus according to claim 1, wherein, in the mode, the control unit controls the driving unit to rotate and drive the photosensitive body by a first moving distance in the second rotation direction, and then to rotate and drive the photosensitive body by a second moving distance shorter than the first moving distance in the first rotation direction (Inada: col. 8 lines 52-56). Claim(s) 2-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 10,156,814 to Ohata in view of US 7,738,807 to Inada et al. and JP 09054494 A to Kitagawa, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of US 2014/0286673 to Ota. Regarding claim 2, the modification in view of Kitagawa does not explicitly suggest a collection sheet, including a free end and a fixed end. Ota discloses a collection portion (70, Figs. 3 & 4) to capture scattered toner, including a capture sheet (74) that captures a toner that leaks from an abutting part (A1), one end is fixed to a mounting surface of a developer container, wherein a free end of the collection sheet is positioned above a fixed end of the collection sheet in the gravity direction. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a collection sheet on the sleeve cover 37 such that the image forming apparatus of claim 1 further comprises a collection sheet provided to face the photosensitive body in a non-contact manner at a position on a downstream of an exposure position where the photosensitive body is exposed by the exposure device and on an upstream of the contact position in the first rotation direction, wherein the collection portion includes the collection sheet, wherein a free end of the collection sheet is positioned above a fixed end of the collection sheet in the gravity direction, for at least the purpose of preventing toner scattering in the apparatus. In particular, “a free end of the collection sheet is positioned above a fixed end of the collection sheet in the gravity direction”, as shown in Ota, would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to ensure toner can be effectively contained within the collection portion. Since Inada discloses an amount of reverse rotation as a result effective variable, the features wherein the free end of the collection sheet is positioned between the exposure position and the arrival position when the photosensitive body is rotated and driven in the second rotation direction with the contact position as the starting point in the mode in the horizontal direction, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing to discover the optimum or workable range of the arrival position when the photosensitive body is rotated and driven in the second rotation direction, as a recognized result-effective variable, by routine experimentation (MPEP 2144.05). The modification above further renders obvious: (claim 3) The image forming apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the exposure device includes a light emitting element configured to emit light, and an irradiation unit configured to perform irradiation with the light emitted from the light emitting element (see Ohata: Fig.1), wherein the free end of the collection sheet is positioned above the irradiation unit in the gravity direction, and wherein the free end of the collection sheet is positioned between the irradiation unit and the arrival position when the photosensitive body is rotated and driven in the second rotation direction with the contact position as the starting point in the mode in the horizontal direction. (claim 4) The image forming apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the developing device further includes a sheet bonding member (Ohata: 37, per the modification) to which the collection sheet is bonded, and wherein the collection portion includes the collection sheet and the sheet bonding member. (claim 5) The image forming apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the developing device further includes a regulation member (Ohata: sleeve cover 37) configured to regulate an amount of developer born on the developer bearing member, and wherein the sheet bonding member (37) is formed integrally with the regulation member. (claim 6) The image forming apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the developing device further includes a sheet bonding member (Ohata: sleeve cover 37) to which the sheet (Ohata:39) and the collection sheet (per the modification) are bonded, and wherein the collection portion includes the sheet, the collection sheet, and the sheet bonding member . (claim 7) The image forming apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the developing device further includes a regulation member (Ohata:33) configured to regulate an amount of developer born on the developer bearing member. Wherein the sheet bonding member is formed integrally with the regulation member would be merely a matter of obvious engineering choice for at least the purpose of reducing the number of parts in the apparatus, absent persuasive evidence showing that the claimed configuration possesses unexpected results. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 10,156,814 to Ohata in view of US 7,738,807 to Inada et al. and JP 09054494 A to Kitagawa, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of US 2021/0373456 to Iwata. Regarding claim 9, Ohata in view of Inada and Kitagawa teaches the image forming apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the developer bearing member is rotatable, and wherein the developing device further includes a regulation member (Ohata: 33) configured to regulate an amount of developer born on the developer bearing member but appears silent about another sheet as claimed. Iwata discloses an image forming apparatus including a layer regulating member 104 for shaping the developer adsorbed onto the developer roller 121 into a thin layer of developer, a protective cover 108 for protecting the layer regulating member 104, a seal member 109 disposed on the protective cover 108 adjacent to or in contact with the developer on the developer roller 121, a seal member 110 disposed in the developer container 107 adjacent to or in contact with the developer on the developer roller 121 (Fig.3). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the image forming apparatus of claim 1 to include a seal member (like 109 of Iwata) such that it comprises another sheet provided in contact with the developer bearing member at a position on a downstream of a position where the regulation member comes closest to the developer bearing member and on an upstream of the development position in a rotation direction of the developer bearing member, for at least the purpose of preventing toner scattering outside the developing device. Claim(s) 11, 18, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 10,156,814 to Ohata in view of US 7,738,807 to Inada et al. and JP 09054494 A to Kitagawa. Regarding claim 11, Ohata discloses an image forming apparatus (100), comprising: a rotatable photosensitive body (1); an exposure device (5) configured to expose the photosensitive body to form an electrostatic latent image on the photosensitive body (col. 4 lines 15-19); a developing device (3) including a developing container (20) configured to house a developer containing toner and carriers, and a developer bearing member (31) configured to bear and convey the developer to a development position where the electrostatic latent image formed on the photosensitive body by the exposure device is developed (col. 5 lines 1-11); a cleaning member (7) provided in contact with the photosensitive body and configured to clean the photosensitive body (col. 5 lines 59-62); a driving unit (inherent) configured to rotate and drive the photosensitive body in a first rotation direction during development operation in which the developing device develops the electrostatic latent image formed on the photosensitive body (col. 5 lines 49-57); a control unit (inherent, not shown) configured to control the driving unit; and a sheet (39, Fig.3) provided in contact with the photosensitive body at a position on a downstream of a position where the cleaning member is in contact with the photosensitive body and on an upstream of the development position in the first rotation direction (col. 7 lines 15-24). Ohata further teaches a mode in which the supply roller is rotated in a second rotation direction opposite to the first rotation direction, during non-development operation in which the development operation is not performed. In the second mode, floating toner particles accumulate around a regulation blade is collected and returned to the developing container. However, Ohata is silent about driving the photosensitive body in a second rotation direction opposite to the first rotation direction and does not explicitly recite a collection portion, as claimed. Inada discloses an image forming apparatus (1, Fig.1), comprising: a rotatable photosensitive body (3); an exposure device (5) configured to expose the photosensitive body to form an electrostatic latent image on the photosensitive body; a developing device (6) including a developing container configured to house a developer and a developer bearing member configured to bear and convey the developer to a development position where the electrostatic latent image formed on the photosensitive body by the exposure device is developed; a cleaning member (81) provided in contact with the photosensitive body and configured to clean the photosensitive body; a driving unit (9) configured to rotate and drive the photosensitive body in a first rotation direction (i.e., positive rotation) during development operation in which the developing device develops the electrostatic latent image formed on the photosensitive body; and a control unit (100) configured to perform a mode (Fig.5) for controlling the driving unit to perform a set of rotating and driving the photosensitive body in a second rotation direction (i.e., reverse rotation) opposite to the first rotation direction (S142) and then rotating and driving the photosensitive body in the first rotation direction a plurality of times (S144), during non-development operation in which the development operation is not performed. The optimum values of a rotation amount of the photosensitive body are determined such that foreign objects as paper powder that remain under the cleaning blade edge can be removed effectively and the inverse warpage of the blade does not occur (col. 8 lines 28-38). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Ohata and Inada such that in the image forming apparatus of Ohata the control unit is configured to perform a mode for controlling the driving unit to perform a set of rotating and driving the photosensitive body in a second rotation direction opposite to the first rotation direction and then rotating and driving the photosensitive body in the first rotation direction a plurality of times during non-development operation in which the development operation is not performed; for at least the purpose of removing accumulated developer from the cleaning member thus ensuring cleaning performance. Kitagawa discloses an image forming apparatus (Fig.1), comprising: a rotatable photosensitive body (1); a developing device (40) including a developer bearing member; the lower portion of the housing of the developing device is extended to form a collection portion (490, Fig.9) that captures leaked toner and is provided to face the photosensitive body in a non-contact manner in a region below a position at which a seal member (500) faces the photosensitive body, in a gravity direction. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify the apparatus of Ohata such that the sleeve cover 37 is configured as a collection portion provided to face the photosensitive body in a non-contact manner in a region below a contact position where the sheet is in contact with the photosensitive body in a gravity direction and between the contact position and an arrival position on most downstream of the contact position in the second rotation direction when the photosensitive body is rotated and driven in the second rotation direction with the contact position as a starting point in the mode in a horizontal direction, for at least the purpose of collecting toner separated at the contact position and falling down to deteriorate image quality. The combination above further renders obvious: (claim 18) The image forming apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the collection portion is provided over a substantially entire region of a maximum image region where an image is formable on the photosensitive body, in a rotation axis direction of the photosensitive body (Ohata #37 and Kitagawa #490 extend in the axial direction). (claim 20) The image forming apparatus according to claim 11, wherein, in a final set of the plurality of sets in the mode, the control unit controls the driving unit to rotate and drive the photosensitive body by a first moving distance in the second rotation direction, and then to rotate and drive the photosensitive body by a second moving distance shorter than the first moving distance in the first rotation direction (Inada: col. 8 lines 52-56). Claim(s) 12-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 10,156,814 to Ohata in view of US 7,738,807 to Inada et al. and JP 09054494 A to Kitagawa, as applied to claim 11 above, and further in view of US 2014/0286673 to Ota. Regarding claim 12, the modification in view of Kitagawa does not explicitly suggest a collection sheet, including a free end and a fixed end. Ota discloses a collection portion (70, Fig.4) to capture scattered toner, including a capture sheet (74) that captures a toner that leaks from an abutting part (A1), one end is fixed to a mounting surface of a developer container, wherein a free end of the collection sheet is positioned above a fixed end of the collection sheet in the gravity direction. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a collection sheet on the sleeve cover 37 such that the image forming apparatus of claim 11 further comprises a collection sheet provided to face the photosensitive body in a non-contact manner at a position on a downstream of an exposure position where the photosensitive body is exposed by the exposure device and on an upstream of the contact position in the first rotation direction, wherein the collection portion includes the collection sheet, wherein a free end of the collection sheet is positioned above a fixed end of the collection sheet in the gravity direction, for at least the purpose of preventing toner scattering in the apparatus. In particular, “a free end of the collection sheet is positioned above a fixed end of the collection sheet in the gravity direction”, as shown in Ota, would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to ensure toner can be effectively contained within the collection portion. Since Inada discloses an amount of reverse rotation as a result effective variable, the features wherein the free end of the collection sheet is positioned between the exposure position and the arrival position when the photosensitive body is rotated and driven in the second rotation direction with the contact position as the starting point in the mode in the horizontal direction, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing to discover the optimum or workable range of the arrival position on the most downstream of the contact position in the second rotation direction when the photosensitive body is rotated and driven in the second rotation direction, as a recognized result-effective variable, by routine experimentation (MPEP 2144.05). The modification above further renders obvious: (claim 13) The image forming apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the exposure device includes a light emitting element configured to emit light, and an irradiation unit configured to perform irradiation with the light emitted from the light emitting element (see Ohata: Fig.1), wherein the free end of the collection sheet is positioned above the irradiation unit in the gravity direction, and wherein the free end of the collection sheet is positioned between the irradiation unit and the arrival position on the most downstream of the contact position in the second rotation direction when the photosensitive body is rotated and driven in the second rotation direction with the contact position as the starting point in the mode in the horizontal direction. (claim 14) The image forming apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the developing device further includes a sheet bonding member (Ohata: 37, per the modification) to which the collection sheet is bonded, and wherein the collection portion includes the collection sheet and the sheet bonding member. (claim 15) The image forming apparatus according to claim 14, wherein the developing device further includes a regulation member (Ohata: sleeve cover 37) configured to regulate an amount of developer born on the developer bearing member, and wherein the sheet bonding member (37) is formed integrally with the regulation member. (claim 16) The image forming apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the developing device further includes a sheet bonding member (Ohata: sleeve cover 37) to which the sheet (Ohata:39) and the collection sheet (per the modification) are bonded, and wherein the collection portion includes the sheet, the collection sheet, and the sheet bonding member . (claim 17) The image forming apparatus according to claim 16, wherein the developing device further includes a regulation member (Ohata:33) configured to regulate an amount of developer born on the developer bearing member. Wherein the sheet bonding member is formed integrally with the regulation member would be merely a matter of obvious engineering choice for at least the purpose of reducing the number of parts in the apparatus, absent persuasive evidence showing that the claimed configuration possesses unexpected results. Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 10,156,814 to Ohata in view of US 7,738,807 to Inada et al. and JP 09054494 A to Kitagawa, as applied to claim 11 above, and further in view of US 2021/0373456 to Iwata. Regarding claim 19, Ohata in view of Inada and Kitagawa teaches the image forming apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the developer bearing member is rotatable, and wherein the developing device further includes a regulation member (Ohata: 33) configured to regulate an amount of developer born on the developer bearing member but appears silent about another sheet as claimed. Iwata discloses an image forming apparatus including a layer regulating member 104 for shaping the developer adsorbed onto the developer roller 121 into a thin layer of developer, a protective cover 108 for protecting the layer regulating member 104, a seal member 109 disposed on the protective cover 108 adjacent to or in contact with the developer on the developer roller 121, a seal member 110 disposed in the developer container 107 adjacent to or in contact with the developer on the developer roller 121 (Fig.3). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the image forming apparatus of claim 11 to include a seal member (like 109 of Iwata) such that it comprises another sheet provided in contact with the developer bearing member at a position on a downstream of a position where the regulation member comes closest to the developer bearing member and on an upstream of the development position in a rotation direction of the developer bearing member, for at least the purpose of preventing toner scattering outside the developing device. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARLENE HEREDIA whose telephone number is (571)272-8393. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephanie Bloss can be reached at (571)272-3555. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Arlene Heredia Ocasio/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601995
FRAME DEVICE INCLUDING SEPARATE SUPPORT FRAMES AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596323
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS HAVING GUIDES FOR INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF A REMOVAL UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12572098
PRESSURE SWITCHING MECHANISM AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560883
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, IMAGE MISALIGNMENT CORRECTION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560882
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD OF THE IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM WITH DISPLAY OF GUIDANCE ON PLACING DIRECTION OF SHEET HAVING PROJECTED PORTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+3.6%)
1y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 522 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month