Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/963,202

METHOD FOR DIAGNOSTIC ENERGY SHIFTING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 27, 2024
Priority
Dec 15, 2023 — EU 23217308.8
Examiner
SANGHERA, JAS A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Rimac Technology LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allowance Rate
1098 granted / 1161 resolved
+34.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1173
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
37.3%
-2.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1161 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice to Applicant 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Claims 1-16 are pending. Priority 3. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. 5. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Per claim 1, it is unclear if the phrase “connecting at least one third module of remaining modules of the plurality of modules into series positive and/or into series negative and/or in parallel to one another” implies that the at least one third module is a plurality of third modules wherein the stated connections are between modules of the plurality of third modules or if the at least one third module has the stated connection with the remaining modules. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 2-16 are consequently rejected due to their dependence on claim 1. Claim 4 is directed to the method of claim 2 and states that it further comprises continuing to perform the at least one diagnostic test on the at least one second module. However, it is unclear if the “continuing to perform” action implies that the at least one diagnostic test is performed on the at least one second module prior to the second predefined criterion being reached. Appropriate correction is required. To note, claim 2 describes the at least one first module as being in a diagnostic state for performing at least one diagnostic test when the first predefined criterion is reached. Pertinent Prior Art 6. Kahn et al. – US 2023/0011716 This document discloses a battery system comprising a plurality of stacks 104, each stack 104 including a plurality of batteries 110 and a plurality of power converters 112. When a first battery 110 of a stack 104 reaches a first voltage threshold value at a first time, its charge or discharge rate is reduced, and, when a second battery 110 reaches the first voltage threshold value at a second time that is after the first time, the charge or discharge rate of the first battery is increased (Figs. 1, 10, and 19; ¶49, 66, and 88). However, this document is silent on, in particular, selectively switching at least one first module of the plurality of modules into series positive or into series negative with at least one second module of the plurality of modules, wherein the plurality of modules each comprises a plurality of energy sources and a plurality of power converter modules, as required by independent claim 1 of the present application. Claim Objections 7. Claim 1 is objected to due to the following informality. Per claim 1, it appears that the phrase “when the first predefined criterion is reached, discharging or charging the at least one first module from or to the at least one or more of the remaining modules at a second predefined discharge or charge rate until a second predefined criterion is reached” should be revised to “when the first predefined criterion is reached, discharging or charging the at least one first module to or from the at least one or more of the remaining modules at a second predefined discharge or charge rate until a second predefined criterion is reached.” Conclusion 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAS A. SANGHERA whose telephone number is (571)272-4787. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th, alt. Fri, 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, WALTER LINDSAY can be reached at (571) 272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAS A SANGHERA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706331
BATTERY SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704556
EXCITATION FOR SPECTROSCOPY
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704557
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A STATUS OF AN ELECTROCHEMICAL ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699146
BATTERY IMPEDANCE SPECTRA MEASUREMENT
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693345
Method for determining the state of health of a rechargeable battery
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+4.9%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1161 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month