Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/963,467

HIGH TORQUE CONNECTION WITH ENHANCED BREAK IN PERFORMANCE

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Nov 27, 2024
Examiner
BOCHNA, DAVID
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
VALORA ENGINEERING LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
1438 granted / 1801 resolved
+27.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1849
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§102
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§112
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1801 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The “Related Applications” section of the specification should include the patent number of the related application. Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 30-32 and 36-45 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,196,345. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID E. BOCHNA whose telephone number is (571)272-7078. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at (571) 270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID BOCHNA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601444
THERMALLY INSULATED PIPE SYSTEM, THERMALLY INSULATING PIPE SECTION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A THERMALLY INSULATING PIPE SECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601430
SHOWER COLUMN ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601226
TUBULAR MEMBER WITH ASYMMETRIC BURST AND COLLAPSE RATINGS, METHOD, AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601428
METER SWIVEL NUT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584570
MULTILAYER TUBULAR MOLDED BODY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING MULTILAYER TUBULAR MOLDED BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1801 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month