Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/963,899

ETHERNET CONTROL METHOD AND DEVICE USED IN NETWORK TERMINAL

Non-Final OA §101§112
Filed
Nov 29, 2024
Priority
May 16, 2024 — CN 2024106076864
Examiner
DAILEY, THOMAS J
Art Unit
2458
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nanjing Qinheng Microelectronics Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
703 granted / 869 resolved
+22.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
892
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
82.9%
+42.9% vs TC avg
§102
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 869 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-13 are pending. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in China on 5/16/2024. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the Chinese application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claims 8 is directed a device that when interpreted in light of the specification may read on software alone which is non- statutory. Specifically, the device comprises terminals which in turn comprises modules and thus the device is nothing more than modules, where the modules may be software alone. In order to comply, the claimed devices must explicitly comprise hardware (e.g. a processor, memory) so they may not be reasonably be interpreted as software alone. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites, “wherein the system terminal is first application software mounted on the network terminal.” The limitation is unclear as the structure and grammar of the limitation is unclear to the examiner. Specifically, software is typically installed not “mounted” thus leaving the reader in doubt as to what is occurring. Further it is unclear in what context “first” is being used. That is, sequentially is the “mounting” the first step to occur in the claim (just recite an active “mounting” or “installing” step then)? Is “first” differentiating this application software from “a second application software”? Claim 1 recites, “receiving, by the device terminal, the network startup command, simulating unplugging, plugging and reconnection of the network cable, and ensuring that an address management module is in a startup state during reconnection.” By not reciting, “during the reconnection,” the claim is unclear since it is not specifically referencing when the ensuring occurs. Claim 8 recites substantially similar limitations to those recited in claim 1 and is rejected by the same rationale. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-13 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US Pat. 7,352,289 – The method involves detecting a change of connection state of a network cable connector i.e. RJ-45 connector, using a sensor that resides in the connector. A change of connection state signal is transmitted from the sensor to a processor within the connector. The processor within the connector is operated to generate connection state information from the change of connection state signal. The processor is operated to communicate the connection state information to a connection state monitoring utility within information technology (IT) network. US Pat. 7,657,762 – A power manager to control power state of plug-in circuit module, operable with a standard allowing unplugging of module from processing circuit, is implemented based on power control processes. A program interface and communication link is established between power manager and device driver, power manager and system BIOS, respectively. An input/output interface is provided between system BIOS and plug-in circuit module, to simulate with system BIOS one of connection and disconnection of circuit module to/from system BIOS. US Pat. 9,955,217 – The method involves judging whether a state of set-top box changes from a broadcasting state when a broadcasting service is provided to a passive standby state in a network connection between the set-top box and a head end. State information associated with an IP address is received from the set-top box response to the state of the set-top box changing to the passive standby state. A state change command is transmitted to the set-top box to maintain the network connection for the IP address allocated to the set-top box based on the received state information. US Pat. 12,436,910 – The network interface controller (NIC) has media access controllers (MACs) associated with physical layers (PHYs). The controller initializes a timer with a delay time for one of the PHYs in response to a power on reset, to delay configuration of one PHY for the delay time after the reset. The controller is provided PHY and MACs after delay time has expired. The PHY are disabled during delay time. The delay time is from 1 to 1023 seconds, and each PHY has a same delay time, where the delay times are for respective PHY. US Pub. No. 2007/0162594 – The method involves detecting a pending disconnection of a device such as virtual machine, which is operating within a virtual computing network. A message indicating the pending disconnection is generated and transmitted to at least one network component such as network virtualization service provider (VSP) and network driver interface specification (NDIS) miniport, and the disconnection of the device is paused. US Pub. No. 2007/0041388 – A network device e.g. sensor comprises configuration information used to operate the network device in network environment. A connector in the network device provides external communication with the network device. The storage device comprises instructions for implementing dynamic host control protocol (DHCP) server, DHCP client and domain name server (DNS). An embedded Ethernet device in electrical communication with the storage device and the connector uses the instructions for operating the network device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS J DAILEY whose telephone number is (571)270-1246. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30am-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Umar Cheema can be reached on 571-270-3037. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS J DAILEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2458
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683988
MANAGING INTRUSION EVENTS USING A MANAGEMENT CONTROLLER
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670291
PREDICTING LIKELIHOOD OF AND PREVENTING END USERS INAPPROPRIATELY INPUTTING SENSITIVE DATA
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659294
EXTENDING CLOUD-BASED VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS TO USER EQUIPMENT ON RADIO-BASED NETWORKS
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12634277
ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634305
UNSUPERVISED GAN-BASED INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM USING TEMPORAL CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORKS, SELF-ATTENTION, AND TRANSFORMERS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+15.0%)
3y 2m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 869 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month