Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/964,449

HANDS-FREE SHOEHORN

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 01, 2024
Examiner
DURHAM, NATHAN E
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
659 granted / 1008 resolved
-4.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1030
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
38.1%
-1.9% vs TC avg
§102
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1008 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/7/2026 has been entered based on RCE dated 2/9/2026. Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendment and corresponding arguments, filed 2/7/2026, have been reviewed and considered. Claims 1, 11 and 16 have been amended and claims 20-22 have been added. Therefore, claims 1, 3-14 and 16-22 are currently pending wherein claims 3-9, 11-14 and 16-18 have been previously withdrawn. Applicant’s amendment to independent claim 1 is considered sufficient in overcoming the prior art rejection(s) of the previous Office Action. This Office Action is a Non-Final Rejection based on the filing of the RCE dated 2/9/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 10 and 20-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by PETERNEL (WO 2024/049359 A1). Regarding claim 1, PETERNEL discloses a hands-free shoehorn device, comprising: a base (1) (Fig. 1); a vertical support (1’) coupled to the base (1) and extending vertically from the base (1) (Fig. 1); a shoehorn (4, 5, 6e) coupled to (at 6d) the vertical support (1’) and extending toward the base (1) (different portions of the shoehorn extend towards the base depending on the position thereof) (Figures 1 and 3); a shoe support (2) coupled to the base (1) and having a length fully capable of functioning to support both a heel portion and a toe portion of a shoe (Figures 1 and 3) (note that even if a toe portion of the shoe is not located above the support 2, the support 2 would still be supporting the toe portion as shown in at least figures 3d and 3e) (additionally, a heel portion of the shoe could be functionally located at the rear of the support around element 3 so that a toe portion of the shoe would be above the support 2); and a pivot (6a) upon which the shoe support (2) is pivotable to vertically move one end of shoe support (2), the pivot (6a) having a fixed position relative to the base (1) (Figures 1 and 3); wherein at least a portion of the shoe support (2) is vertically movable toward the shoehorn (4, 5, 6e) by pivoting the shoe support (2) upon the pivot (6a) (Figures 1 and 3); and an entirety of the length of the shoe support (2) rotates about the fixed position by pivoting the shoe support (2) upon the pivot (6a) (Figures 1 and 3). Regarding claim 10, PETERNEL discloses the shoehorn (4, 5, 6e) being resiliently deformable based on at least element 6e being “elastic” (Page 4) (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 20, PETERNEL discloses the shoe support (2) being configured to rotate about the fixed position of the pivot (6a) to move between opposite directions of inclination relative to the base (1) (Figures 1 and 3). Regarding claim 21, PETERNEL discloses the shoe support (2) being functionally capable of pivoting in opposite directions about the pivot (6a) in response to forces applied at opposite longitudinal ends of the shoe support (2) (Figures 1 and 3). Regarding claim 22, PETERNEL discloses the shoe support (2) being functionally capable of pivoting bidirectionally in response to user-applied forces at each of opposite ends of the shoe support (2) (Figures 1 and 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 10 and 19-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JANG (KR 10-2006-0068623) in view of PARK (KR 102586764 B1). Regarding claims 1 and 20-22, JANG discloses a hands-free shoehorn device, comprising: a base (111) (Fig. 5); a vertical support (121) coupled to the base (111) and extending vertically from the base (111) (Fig. 5); a shoehorn (127) coupled to the vertical support (121) and extending toward the base (111) (Fig. 5); a shoe support (131) coupled to the base (111) and configured to support a shoe (1) (Fig. 5); and a pivot (132) upon which the shoe support (131) is pivotable to be capable of functioning to vertically move one end of shoe support (131), the pivot (132) having a fixed position relative to the base (111) (Fig. 5); wherein at least a portion of the shoe support (131) is capable of functioning to be vertically movable toward the shoehorn (127) by pivoting the shoe support (131) upon the pivot (132); and an entirety of a length of the shoe support (131) rotates about the fixed position by pivoting the shoe support (131) upon the pivot (132) (Fig. 5). However, JANG fails to disclose the shoe support (131) having a length configured to support both a heal portion and a toe portion of a shoe. PARK discloses a shoehorn device comprising a shoe support (300) having a length configured to support both a heal portion and a toe portion of a shoe wherein the entire length of the shoe support (300) rotates about a pivot (200) located between the ends of the shoe support (300) (Figures 1-8). Note that the shoe support (300) of PARK is pivotable in opposite directions (bi-directionally) about the pivot (200) in response to forces applied at opposite ends of the shoe support (Figures 3-7). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have provided the shoe support of JANG with a greater length and a more inner pivot position, in light of the teachings of PARK, in order to give a user greater control of movement of the shoe support for more easily applying the shoe to the user’s foot. Regarding claim 10, JANG discloses the shoehorn (127) being resiliently deformable (note that element 127 is resiliently flexible to allow a user to push his or her foot down into the shoe as described in the spec and shown in figures) (Figure 5). Regarding claim 19, JANG discloses the shoehorn (127) having a fixed orientation relative to the vertical support (121) (Fig. 5). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHAN E DURHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-8642. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am - 4:00 pm, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alissa J Tompkins can be reached at 571-272-3425. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. NED /NATHAN E DURHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 12, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 12, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596468
Digital Design Tool with Preview in Browser
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590406
HEATING UNIT, HEATING INNER CHAMBER AND HANGING IRONING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577714
SEWING DATA CREATION DEVICE, PROGRAM, AND SEWING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575656
System, Apparatus, and Method for Threading a Beader Tool with Hair Beads
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571145
OUTER LAYER STRUCTURE OF A STUFFED OBJECT AND A SEWING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+17.1%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1008 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month