Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/964,680

ZOOM LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 02, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2024 — JP 2024-028943
Examiner
SIPES, JOHN CURTIS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tamron Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
68 granted / 88 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
127
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
61.7%
+21.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 88 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/02/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) as being anticipated over Yamanaka (US 2023/0003983). Regarding claim 1, Yamanaka discloses a zoom lens (Figures 9 and 10; Example 3) consist of: a lens group P1 ([0152] teaches: G1, first lens group) having positive refractive power ([0152] teaches: G1, first lens group, having positive refractive power); a middle group ([0152] teaches: G2, second lens group) including one or more lens groups and having negative refractive power as a whole ([0152] teaches: G2, second lens group, has negative refractive power); a lens group P2 ([0152] teaches: G3, third lens group) having positive refractive power ([0152] teaches: G3, third lens group, has positive refractive power); a lens group P3 ([0152] teaches: G4, fourth lens group) having positive refractive power ([0152] teaches: G4, fourth lens group, has positive refractive power); a lens group N ([0152] teaches: G5, fifth lens group) having negative refractive power ([0152] teaches: G5, fifth lens group, has negative refractive power); and a rear group ([0152] teaches: G5, fifth lens group, corresponding to R, rear group) including one or more lens groups all of which are disposed in order from an object side to an image plane side (Figure 9 depicts: G1-G6 from object side, left hand side of Figure 9, to image plane side, right hand side of Figure 9), wherein the lens group P2 includes a lens component A, having negative refractive power ([0159] discloses: L14, negative meniscus lens), closest to an image plane (Figure 9 depicts: L14, closest to an image plane of G3, third lens group), the lens component A has an object side face having a concave surface facing an object ([0159] discloses: L14, has a concave surface facing an object), and the zoom lens satisfies following Expression: -5.0<fp12w/fw<-0.3 (using values from Example 3, fp12w/fw is calculated to be -1.379, which falls within the claimed range) …(1) where fp12w is a composite focal length of the zoom lens from the lens group P1 to the lens group P2 at a wide-angle end at a time of infinity focusing, and fw is a focal length of the zoom lens at the wide-angle end at the time of infinity focusing. Regarding claim 2, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the zoom lens satisfies following Expression: 0.5<Bfw/Yw<1.5 (Claim 10 discloses: 0.3<Bfw/Yw<1.5, which includes the claimed range) …(2) where bfw is a back focus of the zoom lens at the wide-angle end at the time of infinity focusing, and Yw is a maximum image height of the zoom lens at the wide-angle end at the time of infinity focusing. Regarding claim 3, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the zoom lens satisfies following Expression: -5.0<(Rf+Rb)/(Rf-Rb)<-0.1 (using values from Example 3, (Rf+Rb)/(Rf-Rb), is calculated to be -1.373, which falls within the claimed range) …(3) where Rf is a radius of curvature of a lens surface, of the lens component A, closer to an object, and Rb is a radius of curvature of a lens surface, of the lens component A, closer to an image plane. Regarding claim 4, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the zoom lens satisfies following Expression: -1.3<Fa/Fp2<-0.001 (using values from Example 3, Fa/Fp2 is calculated to be -0.310, which falls within the claimed range)…(4) where fA is a focal length of the lens component A, and fp2 is a focal length of the lens group P2. Regarding claim 5, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the zoom lens satisfies following Expression: 0.001<fp3/fp2<0.45 (using values from Example 3, fp3/fp2 is calculated to be 0.164, which falls within the claimed range) …(5) where fp3 is a focal length of the lens group P3 and fp2 is a focal length of the lens group P2. Regarding claim 6, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the zoom lens satisfies following Expression: 0.4<fp3/fw<1.3 (using values from Example 3, fp3/fw is calculated to be 0.567, which falls within the claimed range) …(6) where fp3 is a focal length of the lens group P3. Regarding claim 7, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the zoom lens satisfies following Expression: 15<vd<40 (using values from Example 3, vd is calculated to be 20.88, which falls within the claimed range) …(7) where vd is an Abbe number of a lens, of the lens group P2, having positive refractive power, the lens being closest to the object, with respect to d Line. Regarding claim 8, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the zoom lens satisfies following Expression: 2.5<fp1/fw<10 (using values from Example 3, fp1/fw is calculated to be 4.436, which falls within the claimed range)…(8) where fp1 is a focal length of the lens group P1. Regarding claim 9, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the zoom lens satisfies following Expression: 0.7<FNOp1_3<1.9 (using values from Example 3, FNOp1_3 is calculated to be: 1.443, 1.158 and 1.122, thus 1.122 falls within the claimed range)…(9) where FNOp1_3 is a minimum value of an open F value in an entire zoom region from the lens group P1 to the lens group P3. Regarding claim 10, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the zoom lens satisfies following Expression: 0.9<βp2w<5.0 (using values from Example 3, βp2w is calculated to be 1.097, which falls within the claimed range)…(10) where βp2w is a lateral magnification of the lens group P2 at the wide-angle end at the time of infinity focusing. Regarding claim 11, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the zoom lens satisfies following Expression: 4.<Tw/Yw<8.5 (using values from Example 3, Tw/Yw is calculated to be 7.627, which falls within the claimed range)…(11) where Tw is an optical total length of the zoom lens at the wide-angle end at the time of infinity focusing. Regarding claim 12, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the lens group P2 includes a cemented lens having a cemented surface with a convex surface facing the object ([0159] discloses: L8, lens, with a convex surface facing the object and cemented with L9, lens; all part of G3, third lens group). Regarding claim 13, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the lens group P2 includes at least two lenses having positive refractive power ([0159] discloses: L8, lens is positive and L11, lens is positive) and at least two lenses having negative refractive power ([0159] discloses: L10, lens is negative, L13, lens is negative; all part of G3, third lens group). Regarding claim 14, Yamanaka discloses the zoom lens according to claim 1, wherein the lens group N moves on an optical axis in focusing ([0154] discloses: G5, fifth lens group, moves toward the image at focusing). Regarding claim 15, Yamanaka discloses an imaging apparatus comprising: the zoom lens according to claim 1; and an image sensor that converts an optical image formed by the zoom lens on an image plane side of the zoom lens into an electrical signal (0014] teaches: zoom lens and an image sensor that converts an optical image formed by the zoom lens into an electrical signal). Compact Prosecution Further prosecution may be expedited by amending the independent claims to more particularly recite the specific lens component arrangement of lens group P2, such as the arrangement of positive and negative lens components disclosed in the embodiments, rather than further narrowing the presently claimed numerical conditions. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Ichimura et al. (US 2020/0233191) and Iwamoto (US 2019/0302404) both disclose relevant zoom lenses buy fail to disclose the correct conditional expressions. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to John Sipes whose telephone number is (703)756-1372. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 4:30-9:30/12:30-7:30 (CT). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bumsuk Won can be reached at (571) 272-2713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. John Sipes Examiner Art Unit 2872 /J.C.S./Examiner, Art Unit 2872 /BUMSUK WON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750586
LENS BARREL
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742948
CAMERA OPTICAL LENS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730285
LARGE-FIELD OF VIEW, HIGH-RESOLUTION BROADBAND OBJECTIVE LENS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724251
ZOOM OPTICAL SYSTEM, OPTICAL APPARATUS, IMAGING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE ZOOM OPTICAL SYSTEM
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12713118
LENS MODULE AND CAMERA MODULE INCLUDING SAME
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+19.4%)
3y 2m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 88 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month