Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/964,729

ZIPPER SLIDER WITH AUTOMATIC RESETTING AND LOCKING FUNCTION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 02, 2024
Priority
Apr 14, 2023 — CN 202320850989.X +2 more
Examiner
UPCHURCH, DAVID M
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ideal Fastener (Guang Dong) Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
762 granted / 1035 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1053
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§102
55.2%
+15.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1035 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 11-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 recites “the zipper slider according to claim 1,” and the recitation begins to recite duplicate structure of the zipper slider according the claim 1, which is unclear to Examiner if there is an additional slider or Applicant intends to claim only the slider of claim 1. Applicant should make the language of the claim consistent with applicant's intent if the zipper slider of claim 1 is/are intended then the preamble should be update to "A zipper slider comprising…" However, in formulating a rejection on the merits, the examiner is considering that the claims are drawn a zipper slider since the recitation of claim 11 includes the claimed structure of claim 1 and claims will be rejected accordingly. If applicant indicated by amendment that "A combination" is the intention, the language in the preamble should be made consistent with that in the body of the claims. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 12-15 are rejected being dependent form claim 11. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: It appears the prior art fails to disclose and/or make obvious the configuration disclosed of the torsion member, elastic piece and first and second elastic members. Claims 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Theobald (U.S. 2015/0374076) discloses an analogous locking slider pertinent to applicant’s invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID M UPCHURCH whose telephone number is (571)270-7957. The examiner can normally be reached 6AM-3PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at (571)272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID M UPCHURCH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677914
RETRACTABLE ZIPPER WITH Y-SHAPED TAPE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669145
Hook Lock And Method
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667687
DIRECTIONAL LOCK FOR INTERFACE HEADGEAR ARRANGEMENT
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663036
FASTENER ASSEMBLY
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660894
ZIP FASTENER
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+17.9%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1035 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month