Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/964,775

SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND RELATED METHODS FOR FASTENING TISSUE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 02, 2024
Examiner
AHMED, MOBEEN
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
211 granted / 341 resolved
-8.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
373
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 341 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This non-final Office action is in response to Applicant’s patent application filed on 12/2/2024. An action on the merits follows. Claims 1-20 are pending in the application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restriction Applicant’s election of Species D (fig. 16) in the reply filed on 1/26/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 9, 11, 14, 16-17 and 20 are withdrawn. Claims 3-5 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species C (fig. 15), there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 1/26/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless - (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1-2, 6-7, 10 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1/2) as being anticipated by USPGP# 20110204120 of Crainich (henceforth Crainich). Regarding claim 1, Crainich teaches A tissue fastening device (20, 24) comprising: a body (24) configured to include a plurality of fasteners (172); an anvil (26) rotatable relative to the body (para 0051); a tissue cutting device (280), wherein the body comprises a channel (178) configured to receive the tissue cutting device (para 0062); a fastener actuator (206, 210) configured to move proximally relative to the body to deploy the plurality of fasteners from the body (para 0006); and a coupling mechanism (208, 236, 334, 330, 332, 282, 284), wherein the coupling mechanism is configured to couple an actuation wire (202) to the fastener actuator and the tissue cutting device (para 0063), and wherein the coupling mechanism includes a biasing member (330 please note bias is defined as “to influence in a particular direction” by American Heritage dictionary. Since 330 initially causes the biased movement of the actuation wire 202 to allow movement of the fastener actuator prior to tissue cutting device, the claims as recited are anticipated. see “https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=bias” Accessed 3/11/2026) configured to delay proximal movement of the tissue cutting device relative to proximal movement of the fastener actuator (para 0067). Regarding claim 2, as shown in claim 1, Crainich teaches wherein the coupling mechanism includes a first connecting wire (234, 236) extending between the actuation wire and the fastener actuator and a second connecting wire (282) extending between the actuation wire and the tissue cutting device (see fig. 18). Regarding claim 6, as shown in claim 2, Crainich teaches wherein the coupling mechanism includes a ring coupler (284), wherein the ring coupler is configured to allow the first connecting wire and the actuation wire to move relative to the ring coupler (para 0067). Regarding claim 7, as shown in claim 6, Crainich teaches wherein when the biasing member is coupled to the first connecting wire (part of the biasing member 332 is connected to 330), between the actuation wire and the fastener actuator (see figs. 16 and 18). Regarding claim 10, Crainich teaches A tissue fastening device (20, 24) comprising: a body (24) configured to include a plurality of fasteners (172); an anvil (26) rotatable relative to the body (para 0051); a tissue cutting device (280), wherein the body comprises a channel (178) configured to receive the tissue cutting device (para 0062); a fastener actuator (206, 210) configured to move proximally relative to the body to deploy the plurality of fasteners from the body (para 0006); an actuation wire (202); a first connecting wire (234, 236) coupling the actuation wire to the fastener actuator (para 0064, fig. 16); a second connecting wire (282) coupling the actuation wire to the tissue cutting device (fig. 18); and a biasing member (330) coupled to the first connecting wire (directly and indirectly as shown in figs. 16 and 18 and as described in para 0064 and 0067) or the second connecting wire (indirectly through 284 as shown in fig. 18), between the actuation wire and (a) the fastener actuator (see fig. 18) Regarding claim 12, as shown in claim 10, Crainich teaches wherein a ring coupler (284) couples the actuation wire to the second connecting wire (para 0067, fig. 18), wherein the ring coupler is configured to allow the first connecting wire and the actuation wire to move relative to the ring coupler (para 0067). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15 and 18-19 are allowed. Regarding claims 15, the prior art of record, in combination with other limitations of the claim, is silent on “a biasing member configured to lengthen or shorten during or after proximal movement of fastener actuator, prior to any proximal movement of the tissue cutting device”. USPGP# 20110204120 of Crainich teaches all of the limitations of claim 8 except for compress the biasing member. The biasing member of Crainich is rigid and not compressible and therefore cannot lengthen or shorten. Furthermore, it would not have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to add/modify such a configuration without hindsight and significant changes to the device of Crainich. Therefore, the prior art, taken alone or in combination, fails to read on the present claims. Claims 18-19 are allowed for depending on claim 15. Claims 8 and 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claims 8 and 13, the prior art of record, in combination with other limitations of the claim, is silent on “proximal movement of the actuation wire is configured to cause the ring coupler to contract a proximal end of the biasing member and compress the biasing member”. USPGP# 20110204120 of Crainich teaches all of the limitations of claim 8 except for compress the biasing member. The biasing member of Crainich is rigid and not compressible and therefore cannot compress. Furthermore, it would not have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to add/modify such a configuration without hindsight and significant changes to the device of Crainich. Therefore, the prior art, taken alone or in combination, fails to read on the present claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOBEEN AHMED whose telephone number is (571) 272-0356. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F (8:30 am to 5 pm). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Kinsaul can be reached on 571-270-1926. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M. A./ Examiner, Art Unit 3731 /VERONICA MARTIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595150
METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PACKAGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583642
METHOD FOR FORMING PAIRS OF PACKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576999
SACHET AND PACKAGING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576496
Universal Chisel Attachment
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12534871
RODS FOR ENGAGING A TOOL OF A HAMMER WITHIN A HOUSING OF THE HAMMER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (+5.9%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 341 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month