Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/964,797

TEST PAD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 02, 2024
Priority
Dec 27, 2023 — TW 112151132
Examiner
PATEL, AMOL H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
CHIPBOND TECHNOLOGY Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
552 granted / 646 resolved
+25.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
656
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§102
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 646 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-8, 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jin et al. (Pub. No. US 2023/0011967). As to claim 1, Jin discloses a test pad 200 (figs. 4-6) arranged on a substrate 110 with at least one circuit line 120 (fig. 4) and configured for contacting of a contact portion of a probe 2000, characterized in that the test pad comprises at least one groove A2, the at least one groove is configured to restrict the contact portion of the probe from sliding out the test pad, and an edge of the at least one groove is configured for contacting of the contact portion of the probe (fig 6). As to claim 3, Jin discloses a body (fig. 6, see center portion A1) and a restriction portion (fig. 6, see left and right portions A1), wherein the at least one groove is located between the body and the restriction portion. As to claim 4, Jin discloses that the body is surrounded by the at least one groove (fig. 5). As to claim 5, Jin discloses that the at least one groove is surrounded by the restriction portion (figs. 5-6). As to claim 6, Jin discloses that an area of the body is greater than or equal to that of the at least one groove (figs. 4-6). As to claim 7, Jin discloses that the body is connected to the at least one circuit line, and an end of the restriction portion is connected to the at least one circuit line (figs. 4-6). As to claim 8, Jin discloses that the body is connected to the at least one circuit line, and an end of the restriction portion is connected to the body (fig. 4). As to claim 13, Jin discloses a body (figs. 5-6, see middle portion A1), wherein an area of the body is greater than or equal to that of the at least one groove (figs. 4-6). Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sasaki (JP 2013170885A). As to claim 1, Sasaki discloses a test pad 7 (fig. 4) arranged on a substrate 1 with at least one circuit line (fig. 4) and configured for contacting of a contact portion of a probe 2, characterized in that the test pad comprises at least one groove 10, the at least one groove is configured to restrict the contact portion of the probe from sliding out the test pad, and an edge of the at least one groove is configured for contacting of the contact portion of the probe (fig. 5). As to claim 2, Sasaki discloses that a width of the at least one groove is less than or equal to an outer diameter of the contact portion of the probe (fig. 5). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding dependent claim 9, the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to teach or fairly suggest, in combining with other limitations within the claim and limitation recited in claims 1 and 3, a combination of limitations that discloses a connection portion, wherein both ends of the connection portion are connected to the body and the restriction portion, respectively, an end of the restriction portion is connected to the at least one circuit line, wherein the restriction portion, the connection portion and the body are passed by a first imaginary line, the restriction portion, the at least one groove and the body are passed by a second imaginary line, and there is an included angle between the first and second imaginary lines. None of the reference art of record discloses or renders obvious such a combination. Regarding dependent claim 10, the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to teach or fairly suggest, in combining with other limitations within the claim and limitation recited in claims 1 and 3, a combination of limitations that discloses a connection portion, wherein both ends of the connection portion are connected to the body and the restriction portion, respectively, an end of the restriction portion is connected to the at least one circuit line, wherein the restriction portion, the connection portion and the body are passed by a first imaginary line, the restriction portion, the at least one groove and the body are passed by a second imaginary line, and the first imaginary line is parallel to the second imaginary line. None of the reference art of record discloses or renders obvious such a combination. Regarding dependent claim 11, the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to teach or fairly suggest, in combining with other limitations within the claim and limitation recited in claims 1 and 3, a combination of limitations that discloses a plurality of grooves, wherein the plurality of grooves are not connected to one another, there is at least one connection portion between the adjacent grooves, and both ends of the at least one connection portion are connected to the body and the restriction portion, respectively. None of the reference art of record discloses or renders obvious such a combination. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMOL H PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-7833. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TIMOTHY THOMPSON can be reached at (571) 272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMOL H PATEL/Examiner, Art Unit 2847 /TIMOTHY J THOMPSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749883
ROUTING STRUCTURE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744336
CONNECTION STRUCTURE OF SUPERCONDUCTING LAYER, SUPERCONDUCTING WIRE, SUPERCONDUCTING COIL, AND SUPERCONDUCTING DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739973
MEMBER FOR INTERCONNECTING ELECTRICALLY A PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AND AT LEAST ONE PIECE OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, AND CONNECTING METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12718971
CABLE CONNECTION STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CABLE CONNECTION STRUCTURE
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12720676
CIRCUIT DEVICE AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.5%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 646 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month