Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/965,457

ELECTRICAL WIRING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 02, 2024
Priority
Jul 31, 2015 — provisional 62/199,953 +6 more
Examiner
JACKSON, STEPHEN W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hubbell Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
990 granted / 1071 resolved
+32.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
1077
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1071 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-18 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-18 of U.S. Patent No. 12,160,097. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both sets of claims are directed toward a circuit interrupting device having a face conductor, a brush conductor and terminal offset design considerations, with differences between the two claim groups being only minor variations in scope and/or differences between the distribution of features between the independent and dependent claims that are not seen to involve an inventive step when the abilities of persons of ordinary skill are taken into full consideration. Instant claim 1 recites: A circuit interrupting device comprising: an input conductor for electrically connecting to an external power supply; a load conductor for electrically connecting to a downstream load and including load terminal; a face conductor for electrically connecting to an external load and including a face terminal; and a brush conductor including a first portion and a second portion arranged as a continuous member, the first portion including a first end electrically connected to the input conductor, the brush conductor including a second end positioned adjacent a transition between the first portion and the second portion, the brush conductor including a first terminal supported on the first portion proximate the second end and a second terminal supported on the second portion at a position that is laterally offset from the first portion and positioned between the first end and the second end, the first terminal being axially offset from the load terminal and the second terminal being axially offset from the face terminal. Patent claim 1 recites: A circuit interrupting device comprising: an input conductor for electrically connecting to an external power supply; a load conductor for electrically connecting to a load; a face conductor for electrically connecting to an external load; a coil sensor measuring a current through the input conductor; and a brush conductor including a first portion and a second portion arranged as a continuous member, the first portion including a first end electrically connected to the input conductor, the first end including a leg extending into the coil sensor and contacting the input conductor, the brush conductor including a second end positioned adjacent a transition between the first portion and the second portion, the brush conductor including a first terminal supported on the first portion proximate the second end and a second terminal supported on the second portion at a position that is laterally offset from the first portion and positioned between the first end and the second end. The removal of the coil sensor design considerations is not observed to be an inventive step beyond the abilities of persons of ordinary skill because both sets of claims recite a circuit interrupting device that would be operatable with or without a coil sensor (use of the device as a manual switch). Instant claim 13 recites: A circuit interrupting device comprising: a line conductor for electrically connecting to an external power supply; a load conductor for electrically connecting to an external load and including a load terminal; a face conductor for electrically connecting to another external load and including a face terminal; a brush conductor in electrical communication with the line conductor and movable between a closed position and an open position, the brush conductor including a first terminal axially offset from the face terminal and a second terminal axially offset from the load terminal; and a latch assembly including, a housing movable in a first direction along and biasing the brush conductor toward the closed position, and a latch plate supported in the housing and movable relative to the housing in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction, wherein actuation of a solenoid moves the latch plate in the second direction, thereby releasing the housing to move along the first direction. Patent claim 13 recites: A circuit interrupting device comprising: a circuit board; a line conductor for electrically connecting to an external power supply; a load conductor for electrically connecting to an external load; a face conductor for electrically connecting to another external load; a brush conductor in electrical communication with the line conductor and movable between a closed position and an open position, the brush conductor including a first terminal selectively contacting the face conductor and a second terminal selectively contacting the load conductor; and a latch assembly including, a housing movable in a first direction along and biasing the brush conductor toward the closed position, and a latch plate supported in the housing and movable relative to the housing in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction, wherein actuation of a solenoid moves the latch plate in the second direction, thereby releasing the housing to move along the first direction. Instant claim 13 adds the feature of axially offsetting circuit elements in a manner that is not seen to involve an inventive step when both of the claim groups include the more complex feature of orthogonal movement of latch plates. Dependent claims 2-12 and 14-18 have a matching pattern of adding features to the independent claims in both the instant Application and the patent, and the recited features of the dependent claims are not observed to produce any inventive combination of functional elements when the abilities of persons of ordinary skill are taken into full consideration. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN W JACKSON whose telephone number is (571)272-2051. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:30-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Lewis can be reached at 571-272-1838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SWJackson June 11, 2026 /STEPHEN W JACKSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683384
VOLTAGE SELECTION CONTROL SCHEME FOR SYNCHRONISM CHECK IN DIGITAL SUBSTATIONS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671392
Systems, Apparatuses, and Methods for Voltage Safety Detection and Voltage Overshoot Management
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666919
TENSION GENERATION DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666920
CHUCKING SENSOR USING FLOATING ESC POWER SUPPLIES
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12651687
ZERO NOISE MAGNETIC FIELD SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+7.4%)
2y 2m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1071 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month