Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/965,757

DISPLAY CONTROLLING APPARATUS, DISPLAY CONTROLLING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 02, 2024
Examiner
DANG, HUNG Q
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
1257 granted / 1841 resolved
+10.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
95 currently pending
Career history
1936
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1841 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 11/10/2025 have been considered but are moot in view of a new ground of rejections. Claim Objections Claim 12 is objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claim 1. Claim 13 is objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claim 6. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 4-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boesel et al. (US 2023/0092282 A1 – hereinafter Boesel) and Ki et al. (US 2014/0240452 A1 – hereinafter Ki). Regarding claim 1, Boesel discloses a display controlling apparatus (Figs. 9A-9E – apparatus 101) comprising: one or more memories storing instructions ([0074] – memory 320 storing program instructions); and one or more processors executing the instructions (Fig. 3; [0042]; [0070] – a processor) to: acquire information indicating a position of a first virtual viewpoint corresponding to a first virtual viewpoint image ([0221] – acquiring information indicating a first location of the view point in order to determine scaling the size of the object) generated based on a plurality of captured images obtained by a plurality of imaging apparatuses ([0073]; [0102]; [0109] – based on a plurality of captured images obtained by a plurality of cameras, e.g. RGB cameras), and information indicating a position of an observed point corresponding to the first virtual viewpoint ([0190]-[00193] – acquiring information indicating a location of an observed point where the object is located according to user’s control); and determine a size of an object indicating the observed point, based on a distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point ([0092]-[0093]; [0221] – determining a size of an object indicating the observed point so that as the object moves further away from the virtual view point, i.e. the distance gets longer, the size of the object is increased); and perform control of displaying a second virtual viewpoint image corresponding to a second virtual viewpoint, the second virtual viewpoint image including the object indicating the observed point having the determined size, and an object indicating the first virtual viewpoint ([0092]-[0093]; [0221]; Figs. 9A, 9D – the object with increased size is displayed accordingly), wherein the determining determines a size of an object indicating the observed point in a case where the distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point is a second distance longer than a first distance, to be larger than a size of an object indicating the observed point in a case where the distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point is the first distance ([0092]-[0093]; [0221] – determining a size of an object indicating the observed point so that as the object moves further away from the virtual view point, i.e. the distance gets longer, the size of the object is increased). However, Boesel does not disclose the one or more processors executing the instructions to: determine, based on the information indicating the position of the first virtual viewpoint and the information indicating the position of the observed point, a position of a second virtual viewpoint that is located at a predetermined distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint in a direction away from the observed point relative to the first virtual viewpoint, such that as a distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point increases, a distance from the position of the second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point also increases. Ki discloses one or more processors executing the instructions to: determine, based on information indicating a position of a first virtual viewpoint and information indicating a position of an observed point, a position of a second virtual viewpoint that is located at a predetermined distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint in a direction away from the observed point relative to the first virtual viewpoint, such that as a distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point increases, a distance from the position of the second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point also increases ([0060]; [0065]; Fig. 5(a)-(c) – determining a virtual location of a user when the user zooms out based on a zooming out factor, i.e. using the zooming out factor to derive the zoomed-out virtual location from the current virtual location and the depth value of the object, i.e. the distance from information indicating a position of an observed point). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to incorporate the teachings of Ki into the display controlling apparatus taught by Boesel to create an effect of a realistic sense for the user to experience. Regarding claim 4, Boesel also discloses the display controlling apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the object indicating the first virtual viewpoint and the object indicating the observed point are three- dimensional models ([0206] - a three-dimensional virtual object such as a three-dimensional model of a car, a three-dimensional model of an alarm clock). Regarding claim 5, Boesel also discloses the display controlling apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a position of the second virtual viewpoint is a position at a predetermined distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint ([0092]-[0093]; [0221] – locations of viewpoint are predetermined by the user). Regarding claim 6, Boesel discloses a display controlling apparatus comprising: one or more memories storing instructions ([0074] – memory 320 storing program instructions); and one or more processors executing the instructions (Fig. 3; [0042]; [0070] – a processor) to: acquire information indicating a position of a first virtual viewpoint corresponding to a first virtual viewpoint image ([0221] – acquiring information indicating a first location of the view point in order to determine scaling the size of the object) generated based on a plurality of captured images obtained by a plurality of imaging apparatuses ([0073]; [0102]; [0109] – based on a plurality of captured images obtained by a plurality of cameras, e.g. RGB cameras), and acquire information indicating a position of an observed point corresponding to the first virtual viewpoint ([0190]-[00193] – acquiring information indicating a location of an observed point where the object is located according to user’s control); and determine a size of an object indicating the observed point, based on a distance from the position of a second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point ([0092]-[0093]; [0221] – determining a size of an object indicating the observed point so that as the object moves further away from the virtual view point, i.e. the distance gets longer, the size of the object is increased), and perform control of displaying a second virtual viewpoint image corresponding to the second virtual viewpoint, the second virtual viewpoint image including the object indicating the observed point having the determined size, and an object indicating the first virtual viewpoint ([0092]-[0093]; [0221]; Figs. 9A, 9D – the object with increased size is displayed accordingly), wherein the determining determines a size of an object indicating the observed point in a case where the distance from the position of the second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point is a second distance longer than a first distance, to be larger than a size of an object indicating the observed point in a case where the distance from the position of the second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point is the first distance ([0092]-[0093]; [0221] – determining a size of an object indicating the observed point so that as the object moves further away from the virtual view point, i.e. the distance gets longer, the size of the object is increased). However, Boesel does not disclose the one or more processors executing the instructions to: determine, based on the information indicating the position of the first virtual viewpoint and the information indicating the position of the observed point, a position of a second virtual viewpoint that is located at a predetermined distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint in a direction away from the observed point relative to the first virtual viewpoint, such that as a distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point increases, a distance from the position of the second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point also increases. Ki discloses one or more processors executing the instructions to: determine, based on information indicating a position of a first virtual viewpoint and information indicating a position of an observed point, a position of a second virtual viewpoint that is located at a predetermined distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint in a direction away from the observed point relative to the first virtual viewpoint, such that as a distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point increases, a distance from the position of the second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point also increases ([0060]; [0065]; Fig. 5(a)-(c) – determining a virtual location of a user when the user zooms out based on a zooming out factor, i.e. using the zooming out factor to derive the zoomed-out virtual location from the current virtual location and the depth value of the object, i.e. the distance from information indicating a position of an observed point). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to incorporate the teachings of Ki into the display controlling apparatus taught by Boesel to create an effect of a realistic sense for the user to experience. Regarding claim 7, Boesel also discloses the display controlling apparatus according to claim 6, wherein a size of the object indicating the observed point is a size on the second virtual viewpoint image ([0092]-[0093]; [0221]; Figs. 9A, 9D). Claim 8 is rejected for the same reason as discussed in claim 1 above. Claim 9 is rejected for the same reason as discussed in claim 6 above. Claim 10 is rejected for the same reason as discussed in claim 1 above in view of Boesel also disclosing a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium that stores a computer program for causing a computer to perform the recited steps ([0074] – memory 320 storing program instructions to be executed by a process as described at least in Fig. 3, [0042], and [0070]). Claim 11 is rejected for the same reason as discussed in claim 6 above in view of Boesel also disclosing a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium that stores a computer program for causing a computer to perform the recited steps ([0074] – memory 320 storing program instructions to be executed by a process as described at least in Fig. 3, [0042], and [0070]). Regarding claim 12, Boesel discloses a display controlling apparatus (Figs. 9A-9E – apparatus 101) comprising: one or more memories storing instructions ([0074] – memory 320 storing program instructions); and one or more processors executing the instructions (Fig. 3; [0042]; [0070] – a processor) to: acquire information indicating a position of a first virtual viewpoint corresponding to a first virtual viewpoint image ([0221] – acquiring information indicating a first location of the view point in order to determine scaling the size of the object) generated based on a plurality of captured images obtained by a plurality of imaging apparatuses ([0073]; [0102]; [0109] – based on a plurality of captured images obtained by a plurality of cameras, e.g. RGB cameras), and information indicating a position of an observed point corresponding to the first virtual viewpoint ([0190]-[00193] – acquiring information indicating a location of an observed point where the object is located according to user’s control); and determine a size of an object indicating the observed point, based on a distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point ([0092]-[0093]; [0221] – determining a size of an object indicating the observed point so that as the object moves further away from the virtual view point, i.e. the distance gets longer, the size of the object is increased); and perform control of displaying a second virtual viewpoint image corresponding to a second virtual viewpoint, the second virtual viewpoint image including the object indicating the observed point having the determined size, and an object indicating the first virtual viewpoint ([0092]-[0093]; [0221]; Figs. 9A, 9D – the object with increased size is displayed accordingly), wherein the determining determines a size of an object indicating the observed point in a case where the distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point is a second distance longer than a first distance, to be larger than a size of an object indicating the observed point in a case where the distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point is the first distance ([0092]-[0093]; [0221] – determining a size of an object indicating the observed point so that as the object moves further away from the virtual view point, i.e. the distance gets longer, the size of the object is increased), and wherein control of displaying a second virtual viewpoint image corresponding to a second virtual viewpoint determined based on the first virtual viewpoint is performed, the second virtual viewpoint image including the object indicating the observed point that has a determined size, and an object indicating the first virtual viewpoint ([0092]-[0093]; [0221]; Figs. 9A, 9D – the object with increased size is displayed accordingly). However, Boesel does not disclose the one or more processors executing the instructions to: determine, based on the information indicating the position of the first virtual viewpoint and the information indicating the position of the observed point, a position of a second virtual viewpoint that is located at a predetermined distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint in a direction away from the observed point relative to the first virtual viewpoint, such that as a distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point increases, a distance from the position of the second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point also increases. Ki discloses one or more processors executing the instructions to: determine, based on information indicating a position of a first virtual viewpoint and information indicating a position of an observed point, a position of a second virtual viewpoint that is located at a predetermined distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint in a direction away from the observed point relative to the first virtual viewpoint, such that as a distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point increases, a distance from the position of the second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point also increases ([0060]; [0065]; Fig. 5(a)-(c) – determining a virtual location of a user when the user zooms out based on a zooming out factor, i.e. using the zooming out factor to derive the zoomed-out virtual location from the current virtual location and the depth value of the object, i.e. the distance from information indicating a position of an observed point). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to incorporate the teachings of Ki into the display controlling apparatus taught by Boesel to create an effect of a realistic sense for the user to experience. Regarding claim 13, Boesel discloses a display controlling apparatus (Figs. 9A-9E – apparatus 101) comprising: one or more memories storing instructions ([0074] – memory 320 storing program instructions); and one or more processors executing the instructions (Fig. 3; [0042]; [0070] – a processor) to: acquire information indicating a position of a first virtual viewpoint corresponding to a first virtual viewpoint image ([0221] – acquiring information indicating a first location of the view point in order to determine scaling the size of the object) generated based on a plurality of captured images obtained by a plurality of imaging apparatuses ([0073]; [0102]; [0109] – based on a plurality of captured images obtained by a plurality of cameras, e.g. RGB cameras), and acquire information indicating a position of an observed point corresponding to the first virtual viewpoint ([0190]-[00193] – acquiring information indicating a location of an observed point where the object is located according to user’s control); and determine a size of an object indicating the observed point, based on a distance from the position of a second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point ([0092]-[0093]; [0221] – determining a size of an object indicating the observed point so that as the object moves further away from the virtual view point, i.e. the distance gets longer, the size of the object is increased); and perform control of displaying a second virtual viewpoint image corresponding to a second virtual viewpoint, the second virtual viewpoint image including the object indicating the observed point having the determined size, and an object indicating the first virtual viewpoint ([0092]-[0093]; [0221]; Figs. 9A, 9D – the object with increased size is displayed accordingly), wherein the determining determines a size of an object indicating the observed point in a case where the distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point is a second distance longer than a first distance, to be larger than a size of an object indicating the observed point in a case where the distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point is the first distance ([0092]-[0093]; [0221] – determining a size of an object indicating the observed point so that as the object moves further away from the virtual view point, i.e. the distance gets longer, the size of the object is increased), and wherein control of displaying a second virtual viewpoint image corresponding to a second virtual viewpoint determined based on the first virtual viewpoint is performed, the second virtual viewpoint image including the object indicating the observed point that has a determined size, and an object indicating the first virtual viewpoint ([0092]-[0093]; [0221]; Figs. 9A, 9D – the object with increased size is displayed accordingly). However, Boesel does not disclose the one or more processors executing the instructions to: determine, based on the information indicating the position of the first virtual viewpoint and the information indicating the position of the observed point, a position of a second virtual viewpoint that is located at a predetermined distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint in a direction away from the observed point relative to the first virtual viewpoint, such that as a distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point increases, a distance from the position of the second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point also increases. Ki discloses one or more processors executing the instructions to: determine, based on information indicating a position of a first virtual viewpoint and information indicating a position of an observed point, a position of a second virtual viewpoint that is located at a predetermined distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint in a direction away from the observed point relative to the first virtual viewpoint, such that as a distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point increases, a distance from the position of the second virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point also increases ([0060]; [0065]; Fig. 5(a)-(c) – determining a virtual location of a user when the user zooms out based on a zooming out factor, i.e. using the zooming out factor to derive the zoomed-out virtual location from the current virtual location and the depth value of the object, i.e. the distance from information indicating a position of an observed point). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to incorporate the teachings of Ki into the display controlling apparatus taught by Boesel to create an effect of a realistic sense for the user to experience. Claims 2-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boesel and Ki as applied to claims 1 and 4-11 above, and further in view of Gitter et al. (US 2024/0420435 A1 – hereinafter Gitter). Regarding claim 2, see the teachings of Boesel and Ki as discussed in claim 1 above. However, Boesel and Ki do not explicitly disclose a size of the object indicating the observed point is determined in such a manner as to be proportionate to the distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point. Gitter discloses a size of an object indicating an observed point is determined in such a manner as to be proportionate to the distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point ([0445] - increasing a size of a virtual object according to a linear relationship with the distance between the viewpoint and the virtual object). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to incorporate the teachings of Gitter into the apparatus taught by Boesel and Ki to enhance the viewing experience, i.e. making more sense to the user. Regarding claim 3, see the teachings of Boesel and Ki as discussed in claim 1 above. However, Boesel and Ki do not explicitly disclose in a case where the distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point is smaller than a threshold value, a size of the object indicating the observed point is determined to be a predetermined size, and in a case where the distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point is equal to or larger than the threshold value, the size is determined to be a larger size as the distance becomes larger. Gitter discloses in a case where a distance from a position of a first virtual viewpoint to a position of an observed point is smaller than a threshold value, a size of an object indicating the observed point is determined to be a predetermined size, and in a case where the distance from the position of the first virtual viewpoint to the position of the observed point is equal to or larger than the threshold value, the size is determined to be a larger size as the distance becomes larger ([0414]; [0445]; Figs. 11A-11F – when the distance is less than a threshold, i.e. a minimum distance 1132a, the size is at a predetermined value 1128a, when the distance is greater than the threshold, the size increases as the distance becomes larger according to a curve 1126-3 or 1126-2). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to incorporate the teachings of Gitter into the apparatus taught by Boesel and Ki to prevent the size of the object from becoming too small that the user cannot see. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUNG Q DANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1116. The examiner can normally be reached IFT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thai Q Tran can be reached at 571-272-7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUNG Q DANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2484
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 10, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594460
MANAGING BLOBS FOR TRACKING OF SPORTS PROJECTILES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588818
DETECTION OF A MOVABLE OBJECT WHEN 3D SCANNING A RIGID OBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592258
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INTERACTIVE VIDEO EDITING PLATFORM TO CREATE OVERLAY VIDEOS TO ENHANCE ENTERTAINMENT VIDEO GAMES WITH EDUCATIONAL CONTENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587693
ARTIFICIALLY INTELLIGENT AD-BREAK PREDICTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574649
ENCODING AND DECODING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+18.3%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1841 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month