DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 1-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
Regarding Claims 1 and 11, the claim recites the limitation "determining, based on a difference between the minimum loss value and angles within the second range of angles being within a threshold value, a heading direction of the virtual box".
The claim language highlighted above makes it unclear whether the limitation means 1) the difference between the minimum loss values and the other loss values of angles within the second range or 2) the difference between the angle with the minimum loss value and the other angles themselves in the second range is within a threshold. In other words, it is unclear whether the threshold is a loss threshold or an angle threshold. For examining purposes, the claims will be interpreted to have meaning 1. Examiner recommends to amend the claim language in the independent claims to clarify what the “difference” is referring to with language
Claims 2-10, 12-20 are rejected for being dependent on rejected claims, and failing to cure the deficiencies.
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 1-20 are rejected above for 112(b) issues but the prior art does not appear to teach the claimed invention.
The closest prior art comes from Baeg et al (US 20220189040) but the prior art does not appear to teach “determine a virtual box corresponding to the object by determining, based on a difference between the minimum loss value and angles within the second range of angles being within a threshold value, a heading direction of the virtual box” in combination with all of the other limitations in the independent claims.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DYLAN M KATZ whose telephone number is (571)272-2776. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs. 8:00-6:00.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abby Lin can be reached on (571) 270-3976. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/DYLAN M KATZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3657
Prosecution Insights