Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/966,135

FUEL CELL MANUFACTURING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 03, 2024
Priority
Feb 21, 2024 — JP 2024-024953
Examiner
KONVES, ADRIANNA N
Art Unit
1748
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
179 granted / 235 resolved
+11.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
54.0%
+14.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 235 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I in the reply filed on May 15, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim 5 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on May 15, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Felix et al (PGPub 2011/0217621). Regarding Claim 1, Felix teaches a fuel cell manufacturing device (Abstract) comprising: a conveying unit that conveys a stacked body in which constituent elements of a fuel cell are stacked via an adhesive layer containing a thermoplastic resin material [0035]; a heating unit that heats the stacked body when the stacked body conveyed by the conveying unit is positioned in a predetermined heating zone ([0011]- heating zone); a cooling unit that cools the stacked body when the stacked body conveyed by the conveying unit is positioned in a predetermined cooling zone after passing through the heating zone ([0011]- cooling zone); and a pressurizing unit that keeps pressurizing the stacked body since the stacked body is heated in the heating zone until the stacked body is cooled in the cooling zone ([0011]- discussing applied pressure in the heating and cooling zones). Regarding Claim 2, Felix further teaches the manufacturing device includes a double belt press device ([0035]; [0037]; Fig. 2); and the double belt press device includes a pair of upper and lower belts that constitutes the conveying unit ([0035]; [0037]; Fig. 2), a heating press portion that constitutes the heating unit and a part of the pressurizing unit ([0011]- heating zone; discussing applied pressure in the heating zone), and a cooling press portion that constitutes the cooling unit and another part of the pressurizing unit ([0011]- cooling zone; discussing applied pressure in the cooling zone). Regarding Claim 3, Felix further teaches the manufacturing device includes a continuous roller press device ([0035]; [0037]; Fig. 2); the continuous roller press device includes a pair of upper and lower roller conveyors that constitutes the conveying unit ([0035]; [0037]; Fig. 2); and the upper and lower roller conveyors include a heating press portion that constitutes the heating unit and a part of the pressurizing unit ([0011]- heating zone; discussing applied pressure in the heating zone), and a cooling press portion that constitutes the cooling unit and another part of the pressurizing unit ([0011]- cooling zone; discussing applied pressure in the cooling zone). Claims 1 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kuhara (JP2020047511 cited in IDS with references to the machine English translation provided herewith). Regarding Claim 1, Kuhara teaches a fuel cell manufacturing device [0001] comprising: a conveying unit that conveys a stacked body in which constituent elements of a fuel cell are stacked via an adhesive layer containing a thermoplastic resin material ([0019] and Figs.- transport units 30); a heating unit that heats the stacked body when the stacked body conveyed by the conveying unit is positioned in a predetermined heating zone ([0031]- heat sealing section; Fig. 3- heat sealing section 40); a cooling unit that cools the stacked body when the stacked body conveyed by the conveying unit is positioned in a predetermined cooling zone after passing through the heating zone ([0033]- the laminate necessarily cools after being heat pressed); and a pressurizing unit that keeps pressurizing the stacked body since the stacked body is heated in the heating zone until the stacked body is cooled in the cooling zone ([0019]-[0020]- clamps 33). Regarding Claim 4, Kuhara further teaches the pressurizing unit includes a jig capable of pressurizing the adhesive layer while sandwiching the stacked body in a stacking direction of the stacked body ([0019]-[0020]- discussing clamps 33); and the jig includes a pair of plates that sandwiches the stacked body (See Figs.- clamps 33), and a positioning member that suppresses positional deviation of the plates in a direction orthogonal to the stacking direction of the stacked body (See Figs.- clamps 33 suppressing positional deviation). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Adrianna Konves whose telephone number is (571)272-3958. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-4:00 MST (Arizona). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abbas Rashid can be reached at (571) 270-7457. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.K./Examiner, Art Unit 1748 7/27/26 /JACOB T MINSKEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1748
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 14, 2026
Interview Requested
Sep 21, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 28, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741399
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CONTINUOUS FIBER-REINFORCED THERMOPLASTIC RESIN SHEET
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734770
FIBER APPLICATION MACHINE PROVIDED WITH A TENSION LIMITING SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731777
POWDER TRANSFER ROLLER DEVICE AND POWDER TRANSFER METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722336
MATERIAL BASED ON POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE AND PROCESS FOR PREPARING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721965
OVERMOLD TECHNIQUE FOR PEEL-AWAY INTRODUCER DESIGN
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 10m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 235 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month