Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/966,173

VEHICLE SEAT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 03, 2024
Examiner
SOOFI, YAZAN A
Art Unit
3668
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Honda Motor Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
720 granted / 809 resolved
+37.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
828
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
§103
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§102
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 809 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA Status of Claims Claims 1-3 of U.S. Application No. 18/966173 filed on 12/03/2024 have been examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1-3 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. [US 2024/0001831 A1], hereinafter referred to as Lee. As to Claim 1, Lee discloses a vehicle seat, comprising: a first electric device, moving a first electric seat to at least one of a first predetermined position and a first predetermined posture inside a vehicle ([see at least Fig. 1, Fig.3, Fig.4, 0055, 0060 and 0076]) ; a second electric device, moving a second electric seat to at least one of a second predetermined position and a second predetermined posture inside the vehicle ([see at least Fig. 1, Fig.3, Fig.4, 0055, 0060 and 0076]), wherein when a predetermined condition is met, controlling the first electric device and the second electric device so that the first electric seat is in the at least one of the first predetermined position and the first predetermined posture and the second electric seat is in the at least one of the second predetermined position and the second predetermined posture ([see at least Fig. 1, Fig.3, Fig.4, 0055, 0060 and 0076]). As to Claim 2, Lee discloses a vehicle seat, comprising: controlling the first electric device and the second electric device according to a carried object placed on the first electric seat and the second electric seat ([see at least Fig. 1, Fig.3, Fig.4, 0055, 0060 and 0076]). As to Claim 3, Lee discloses a vehicle seat, wherein when movement of the first electric seat causes contact with the second electric seat or a passenger sitting on the second electric seat, the second electric device moves the second electric seat away from the first electric seat ([see at least Fig. 1, Fig.3, Fig.4, 0055, 0060 and 0076]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YAZAN A SOOFI whose telephone number is (469)295-9189. The examiner can normally be reached on Flex schedule. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fadey Jabr can be reached on 572-272-1516. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YAZAN A SOOFI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3668
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600426
A VEHICLE WITH ADVERTISING DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602059
ROBOT, CONTROL METHOD FOR ROBOT, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602062
REDUCING RESISTANCE TO MOVEMENT OF DEVICES THAT INCLUDE CASTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583482
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODE CONFUSION AVOIDANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585290
UNMANNED VEHICLE, SYSTEM OF CONTROLLING UNMANNED VEHICLE, AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING UNMANNED VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 809 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month