Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/967,395

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 03, 2024
Priority
Jan 15, 2024 — JP 2024-003747
Examiner
GRAINGER, QUANA M
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1031 granted / 1162 resolved
+20.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-3.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1192
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1162 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-5 and 10-12 are objected to because of the following informalities. The term “extending portion” is not supported by the specification. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-5 and 10-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MURANO (US 2007/0002122 A1; cited by applicant) in view of MATSUNO (JP2018-037445A). MURANO teaches regarding claim 1, an image forming apparatus (shown in figure 1) comprising: a metallic plate 32; a projection member 15-17 provided with a projection portion projecting from the metallic plate; a hole formed by [cutting and raising] a part of the metallic plate; and a bent portion cut [and raised] from the hole, wherein the projection portion projects from the hole, and wherein the bent portion is positioned below the projection portion in a direction of gravity in a state in which the projection portion projects from the hole, and covers the projection portion as seen from below in the direction of gravity. Regarding claim 3, the projection member is a sliding member 41 [0064]. Regarding claim 4, in the direction of gravity a distance between a lower end portion of the projection portion and a surface, of the bent portion, opposite to the projecting portion is 3mm or less (shown in figures 4 and 6). Regarding claim 10, the projection member is a [resin] member. MURANO uses a cut and bend method to form the metallic plate but does NOT teach the use of a cut and raise process to form the metallic plate. Claims 2 and 5 are listed because of the objection above. MATSUNO teaches using the cutting and raising a method for forming a plate. MURANO and MATSUNO are concerned with the forming of plates that function within an image forming device. The rationale for combining the teachings of MATSUNO with the teachings of MURANO relates to the rationale of use of known technique to improve similar devices (methods, or products) in the same way. Further, with respect to claim 10, it is known in the art to select a known material for inherent properties. The rationale for combining the teachings of ordinary skill in the art with the teachings of MURANO relates to the rationale of applying a known technique to a known device (method, or product) ready for improvement to yield predictable results. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to use the known in the art teachings regarding materials with the teaching of MURANO to obtain an equally sturdy position holder for an imager forming device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to use the teaching of MATSUNO with the teaching of MURANO to obtain improved the position determining holder for the image forming structure. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 and 8-9 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-5 and 10-15 have been considered but are moot because of the new claim objection discussed above. The claim contains allowable subject matter. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUANA GRAINGER whose telephone number is (571)272-2135. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday, 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter Lindsay can be reached on 571-272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUANA GRAINGER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852 QG
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 03, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 05, 2026
Response Filed
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704805
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699348
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12687812
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12681412
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM THAT MANUFACTURES BOOKLETS BY HEATING MULTIPLE SHEETS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675066
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (-3.7%)
2y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1162 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month