Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/967,458

METHODS, SYSTEMS AND DEVICES FOR PRE-OPERATIVELY PLANNED ADAPTIVE GLENOID IMPLANTS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 03, 2024
Examiner
HU, ANN M
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Stryker Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
631 granted / 932 resolved
-2.3% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
987
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
43.8%
+3.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 932 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11/17/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 36-39, 41-45, and 56 have been considered, but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 36-39, 41-42, 44-45, and 56 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bojarski et al. (Pub. No.: US 2011/0029093 A1; hereinafter “Bojarksi”). Bojarksi discloses the following regarding claim 36: a computing system comprising: memory storing computer executable instructions (paras. 0211, 0426-0432, known to be inherent computer components); and one or more processors (paras. 0211, 0426-0432, known to be inherent computer components) configured to: generate a virtual model of a glenoid bone of a patient and a virtual model of a glenoid implant (paras. 0286, 0303-0304, 0310); send instructions to an output device (e.g., computer monitor or display screen) of a user to cause the output device to display the virtual model of the glenoid implant with respect to the virtual model of the glenoid bone (paras. 0286, 0303-0304, 0310); perform virtual pre-operative analysis based on one or more of user input of the user or execution of the computer executable instructions to adjust the virtual model of the glenoid implant, wherein to adjust the virtual model of the glenoid implant (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0291, 0310-0312, 0328-0329, 0357-0360, 0419-0429), the one or more processors are configured to: adjust a placement of the virtual model of the glenoid implant with respect to the virtual model of the glenoid bone (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0294, 0357-0360, 0419-0429); evaluate bone support based on the virtual model of the glenoid implant with respect to the virtual model of the glenoid bone by determining a seating of the virtual model of the glenoid implant with respect to the virtual model of the glenoid bone (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0294, 0357-0360, 0419-0429, 0435-0439); and based on evaluating the bone support, adjust a geometry of the virtual model of the glenoid implant (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0294, 0357-0360, 0419-0429), and generate a virtual model of a final glenoid implant for the patient based on the virtual pre-operative analysis (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0294, 0357-0360, 0419-0429). Bojarksi discloses the following regarding claim 37: the system of claim 36, wherein to perform the virtual pre-operative analysis, the one or more processors are configured to send instructions to the output device of the user to display simulations of one or more adjustments to the virtual model of the glenoid implant, the one or more adjustments corresponding to the one or more of the user input of the user or the execution of the computer executable instructions (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0294, 0310, 0357-0360, 0419-0429). Bojarksi discloses the following regarding claim 38: the system of claim 36, wherein to generate the virtual model of the glenoid bone, the one or more processors are configured to generate the virtual model of the glenoid bone based on images taken of the glenoid bone of the patient (paras. 0281-0294). Bojarksi discloses the following regarding claim 39: the system of claim 36, wherein the virtual model of the glenoid bone and the virtual model of the glenoid implant comprise three dimensional (3D) virtual models (paras. 0310-0312). Bojarksi discloses the following regarding claim 41: the system of claim 36, wherein to adjust the placement of the virtual model of the glenoid implant with respect to the virtual model of the glenoid bone, the one or more processors are configured to one or more of: align the virtual model of the glenoid implant with the virtual model of the glenoid bone; or adjust a medialization of the virtual model of the glenoid implant with respect to the virtual model of the glenoid bone (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0294, 0357-0360, 0419-0429, 0435-0439). Bojarksi discloses the following regarding claim 42: the system of claim 36, wherein to adjust the geometry of the virtual model of the glenoid implant, the one or more processors are configured to adjust a width of the virtual model of the glenoid implant (paras. 0211, 0214). Bojarksi discloses the following regarding claim 44: the system of claim 36, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to select a size of the virtual model of the glenoid implant from a range of sizes based on the one or more of the user input of the user or the execution of the computer executable instructions (paras. 0210-0216, 0231, 0377-0379, 0463). Bojarksi discloses the following regarding claim 45: the system of claim 36, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: generate a virtual model of one of a natural humeral head or a humeral head implant; and send instructions to the output device of the user to cause the output device to display the virtual model of the one of the natural humeral head or the humeral head implant with respect to the virtual model of the glenoid implant (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0294, 0310, 0357-0360, 0377-0379, 0419-0429). Bojarksi discloses the following regarding claim 56: a computing system comprising: memory storing computer executable instructions (paras. 0211, 0426-0432, known to be inherent computer components); and one or more processors (paras. 0211, 0426-0432, known to be inherent computer components) configured to: generate a virtual model of a glenoid bone of a patient and a virtual model of a glenoid implant (paras. 0286, 0303-0304, 0310); send instructions to an output device (e.g., computer monitor or display screen) of a user to cause the output device to display the virtual model of the glenoid implant with respect to the virtual model of the glenoid bone (paras. 0286, 0303-0304, 0310); perform virtual pre-operative analysis based on one or more of user input of the user or execution of the computer executable instructions to adjust the virtual model of the glenoid implant, wherein to adjust the virtual model of the glenoid implant (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0291, 0310-0312, 0328-0329, 0357-0360, 0419-0429), the one or more processors are configured to: evaluate bone support based on the virtual model of the glenoid implant with respect to the virtual model of the glenoid bone by determining a seating of the virtual model of the glenoid implant with respect to the virtual model of the glenoid bone (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0294, 0357-0360, 0419-0429, 0435-0439), and based on evaluating the bone support, adjust a geometry of the virtual model of the glenoid implant (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0294, 0357-0360, 0419-0429); and generate a virtual model of a final glenoid implant for the patient based on the virtual pre-operative analysis (paras. 0231-0234, 0271-0272, 0281-0294, 0357-0360, 0419-0429). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 43 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bojarski in view of Bojarski et al. (Pub. No. US 2011/0071802 A1; hereinafter “the ‘802 reference”). Bojarski discloses the limitations of the claimed invention, as described above. However, it does not explicitly recite adjusting a retroversion of the virtual model of the glenoid implant; or adjust an inferior tilt of the virtual model of the glenoid implant. The ‘802 reference teaches that adjusting the geometry of the virtual model of the implant comprises adjusting a retroversion of the virtual model of the glenoid implant; or adjusting an inferior tilt of the virtual model of the glenoid implant (paras. 0012, 0057, 0070, 0111-0126), for the purpose of ensuring that the implant will properly fit its implantation site. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to adjust features of the models of Bojarski, according to the teachings of the ‘802 reference, in order to ensure that the implant will properly fit a particular patient's anatomy. Such a modification would be made with a reasonable expectation of success. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Ann Hu whose telephone number is (571) 272-6652. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday (9:00 am-5:30 pm EST). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, Jerrah Edwards, at (408) 918-7557. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANN HU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 03, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 17, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jun 12, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 14, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 25, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 17, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12551339
EXPANDABLE IMPLANTABLE CONDUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12533249
ACUTE AND CHRONIC DEVICES FOR MODIFYING FLOW IN BODY LUMENS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12521241
TRANSCATHETER VALVE PROSTHESIS HAVING AN EXTERNAL SKIRT FOR SEALING AND PREVENTING PARAVALVULAR LEAKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12514701
Low Profile Expandable Heart Valve
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12502273
PERIVALVULAR SEALING FOR TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+20.9%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 932 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month