Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/967,895

THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 04, 2024
Priority
Dec 29, 2023 — CN 202311871885.8
Examiner
MANCHO, RONNIE M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Shenzhen Anker Smart Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
744 granted / 980 resolved
+15.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1027
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§102
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§112
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 980 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites, “printing a first base printing layer ……; determining printing inkjet data of a first color layer based on the actual printing trajectory of the first base printing layer; printing the first color layer on the first base printing layer based on the printing inkjet data of the first color layer to obtain an additive printed object” It is not clear what all is meant by and encompassed by the phrase, “determining printing inkjet data of a first color layer”. Is it the color of an ink of the inkjet printer, the nozzle of the inkjet printer, the color of an object, the color of a layer of material to be printed? It is not clear what applicant is referring to as, “determining printing inkjet data of a first color layer…” as recited in the claims. As such it is not clear what all is meant and encompassed by the phrase, “printing the first color layer……”. In addition, in claim 1 it is not clear whether applicant meant to write the phrase, “printing a first base printing layer” as -- printing a first base layer..? That is, the layer does not print itself, rather a printer prints a layer of an object that is to be printed. The claim limitations become verbose and confusing because the phrase is not expressed in proper idiomatic English. Applicant is herein requested to make corrections to further prosecution. The rest of the claims are rejected for depending on a rejected claim or for having similar deficiencies as the rejected base claim. Conclusion The prior art [Buller US 2023/0191490 A1, US 2019/0143412; McAlpine US 11820061 B2; KRITCHMAN US 20230158739 A1] made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RONNIE MANCHO whose telephone number is (571)272-6984. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Adam Mott can be reached at 571 270 5376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RONNIE M MANCHO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3657
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 04, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703251
TORQUE CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DRIVE SYSTEMS OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691576
ROBOTIC GRIPPER
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12678976
ROBOTIC APPARATUS FOR CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673442
Method and installation for producing a film or sheet from a slabstock foam, and method and system for retrofitting an installation for film or sheet production
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672509
METHOD OF MONITORING TOOL
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+2.2%)
3y 4m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 980 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month