Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/968,765

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOVING COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL FROM A STREAMING PLATFORM

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 04, 2024
Examiner
DAVIS, CHENEA
Art Unit
2421
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Mux Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
378 granted / 525 resolved
+14.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
548
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 525 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-5, 9-10, 12, 14 and 16-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of US Patent 12,192,582. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the limitations of the claims of the instant application are anticipated in every aspect by the limitations of the patented claims, with the exception of the limitation of “removing the video stream from a video streaming platform”. However, that limitation is obvious over the patented claims in view of Kandpal et al. (US20220327322), and modifying the patented claims to include the limitation would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the invention for the advantage of maintaining authorized usage. The analysis is as follows, with the matching limitations between the US Patent and the instant application, respectively: US Patent 12,192,582 Instant Application 18/968765 1. A method comprising, for a first streaming event at a streaming platform: during a first time period: accessing a set of content logs for a population of content distribution networks including a set of streaming metrics for a video stream; identifying an asset associated with the video stream; accessing an asset profile for the asset, the asset profile including a set of profile parameters; and computing a risk score for the asset according to a score range and based on a subset of profile parameters; and during a second time period: monitoring the set of streaming metrics for the video stream during a set of time intervals of a first duration during a first time window; in response to a first streaming metric, in the set of streaming metrics, for the first video stream exceeding a threshold metric during the first time window, accessing a conflict log including a set of flagged assets; in response to identifying absence of the asset in the conflict log: retrieving the risk score for the asset; extracting a set of image frames from the video stream according to an image extraction frequency; executing an image classification model based on the set of image frames to characterize the image frames according to a set of tags; retrieving a content manifest associated with a content type of the video stream, the content manifest defining a set of target concepts related to the content type; deriving a difference between the set of tags associated with the set of image frames to the set of target concepts in the content manifest to compute a match score for the video stream; in response to the match score exceeding a threshold score: flagging the video stream for manual authentication; and delivering the video stream to an interface associated with an operator; and in response to receiving an abuse confirmation for the video stream from the operator: generating a notification descriptive of the abuse confirmation; transmitting the notification to the asset; and performing an action on the asset profile based on the risk score for the asset; and in response to identifying the asset in the conflict log: identifying the asset profile associated with the asset; and automatically deactivating the asset profile to prevent the first streaming event of the video stream via the streaming platform. 1. A method comprising: monitoring a set of streaming metrics of a video stream associated with an asset; in response to a first streaming metric, in the set of streaming metrics, exceeding a threshold metric, accessing a conflict log comprising a set of flagged assets; in response to absence of the asset in the conflict log: extracting a set of image frames from the video stream; executing an image classification model on the set of image frames to derive a set of derived tags characterizing the set of image frames; retrieving a set of target tags related to a content type of the video stream; calculating a match score for the video stream based on a similarity between the set of derived tags and the set of target tags; in response to the match score exceeding a threshold score, generating a prompt to review the video stream; serving the prompt to an operator; and in response to receiving an abuse confirmation for the video stream from the operator: generating a notification descriptive of the abuse confirmation; transmitting the notification to the asset; and automatically removing the video stream from a video streaming platform. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-8, 11, 13 and 15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US20170357782, US20150302886, US20080178302 US10437965 US20190028766. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHENEA DAVIS whose telephone number is (571)272-9524 and whose email address is CHENEA.SMITH@USPTO.GOV. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Flynn can be reached at 571-272-1915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHENEA DAVIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2421
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 04, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604057
STREAMING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12581147
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING QUALITY OF CONTENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581169
UNDER-ADDRESSABLE ADVERTISEMENT MEASUREMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12556762
METHODS AND APPARATUS TO CALIBRATE RETURN PATH DATA FOR AUDIENCE MEASUREMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12549790
INTEGRATION OF PLATFORMS FOR MULTI-PLATFORM CONTENT ACCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+16.5%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 525 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month