Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/969,441

CLOSED-LOOP LIQUID-COOLED BURN-IN DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 05, 2024
Priority
Aug 09, 2024 — TW 113130055
Examiner
TCHATCHOUANG, CARL F.R.
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Expert International Mercantile Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
152 granted / 184 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
218
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§103
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§102
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 184 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim(s) 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over TAKAHASHI TAKETAKA (Japanese Publication # JP2023143954; hereinafter Takahashi; translation provided by the examiner) in view of Nobi; Laszlo (US patent # US 5086269 A; hereinafter Nobi). Regarding claim 1, Takahashi teaches having a cold water network (par.19 teaches “The first flow path 30 and the second flow path 32 are in communication with each other via a refrigerant flow path 23”) and a hot water network (par.41 teaches a hot water network as third flow path 40); a water tank (par.19 teaches coolant liquid tank 28; coolants contain 50% water) and at least one test socket (par.22 teaches 3-way valve, which acts as a socket), the water tank being in fluid connection with the at least one test socket by the loop (par.22), wherein the water tank has a first reservoir and a second reservoir (par.19 refrigerator 24 and cooling liquid tank 28 as 1st and 2nd reservoir), the first reservoir storing a low-temperature cooling liquid (par.20 teaches low-temperature coolant), and the second reservoir storing a high-temperature cooling liquid (par.20 teaches high-temperature coolant), wherein the first reservoir further provides a heating unit (par.19 teaches a built-in chuck heater 50; par.21 teaches heater 38) for heating up the low-temperature cooling liquid to control a temperature of the cooling liquid (par.24 teaches chuck control system 42 as temp setting unit (thus, controls temperature)) supplied to the at least one test socket (; par.33 teaches controlling heater control system 42 connected to 3-way valve control unit 56). Takahashi fails to teach a closed-loop liquid-cooled burn-in device, comprising: a loop. Nobi does teach a closed-loop liquid-cooled burn-in device (col.7 ln 46-49 teaches closed loop burn-in device), comprising: a loop (col.7 ln 51-52 teaches closed loop.). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Takahashi to include the teachings of Nobi; which would provide an improved burn-in method that makes the burn-in screening of relatively high power, TAB-bonded integrated circuit chips feasible (Nobi col.2 ln 38-40) but also employs a closed loop heat transfer fluid system whose fluid never touches the chip itself, so that there is little or no fluid loss and/or fluid contamination as disclosed by Nobi (col.4 ln 4-6). Regarding claim 2, Takahashi in view of Nobi teaches the closed-loop liquid-cooled burn-in device of claim 1, Takahashi further teaches wherein the first reservoir is in fluid connection with the at least one test socket by the cold water network (par.22 teaches 3-way valve connected to chiller 24 and heater 38), and the second reservoir is in fluid connection with the at least one test socket by the hot water network (par.22). Regarding claim 3, Takahashi in view of Nobi teaches the closed-loop liquid-cooled burn-in device of claim 1, Takahashi further teaches wherein the first reservoir is in fluid connection with a heat exchange unit by the cold water network (par.20-21), and the second reservoir is in fluid connection with the heat exchange unit by the hot water network (par.36-37). Regarding claim 4, Takahashi in view of Nobi teaches the closed-loop liquid-cooled burn-in device of claim 1, Takahashi further teaches wherein the heating unit is attached to an outer wall surface of the first reservoir (par.44 teaches heater 38 located on refrigerator 24 side; the side is interpreted as a wall) and electrically connected to a circuit board (fig.1 shows chuck heater control system 42, which contains several circuit boards, electrically connected to heater 38). Regarding claim 5, Takahashi in view of Nobi teaches the closed-loop liquid-cooled burn-in device of claim 4, Takahashi further teaches wherein the heating unit is a PTC device (par.19 teaches chuck-heater 50; PTC devices are commonly used in chuck heaters because they provide a self‑regulating, safe, and efficient heating solution). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The search yielded 3 prior art that teach, Reference 1, US 8699660 B2; Joshi; Ashutosh et al. teaches “A liquid cooled thermal control system for a computed tomography (CT) detector includes a plurality of temperature sensors and a control mode selector module coupled to the plurality of temperature sensors. The control mode selector module is programmed to receive an input from the plurality of temperature sensors, identify the inputs as either valid inputs or invalid inputs, and determine an operational mode of the liquid cooled thermal control system based on the identified inputs. A CT imaging system and a method of operating a cooling system are also described.” Reference 2, US 20220377943 A1; CHEN; Chao-Jung et al. teaches “A closed-loop liquid cooling system includes a liquid coolant conduit, a cold plate, a pump and a heat exchanger. The liquid coolant conduit is in proximity to a heat-generating electrical component. The liquid coolant conduit allows circulation of a liquid coolant to extract heat therefrom. The liquid coolant conduit includes an inner portion that surrounds and contains the liquid coolant, and an outer portion configured to prevent or inhibit leakage of the liquid coolant from the inner portion and also detect any leakage from the inner portion. The cold plate is in thermal communication with the liquid coolant. The pump is configured to transport the liquid coolant in the liquid coolant conduit. The heat exchanger is coupled to the liquid coolant conduit to extract heat therefrom.” Reference 3, US 20240349449 A1; SUN; Minghui et al. teaches “A containerized single-phase liquid immersion cooling system includes a tank unit, a power distribution unit, a plate heat exchanger unit and a control unit that are disposed within a container, and a liquid cooling system disposed outside the container. A plurality of computational power servers are placed in each tank containing a cooling liquid, and the tank serves as a place for heat exchange between a cooling liquid and the computational power servers. The liquid cooling system is configured to cool a secondary-side medium from the plate heat exchanger unit. A bypass pipe is disposed between the plate heat exchanger unit and the liquid cooling system. The secondary-side medium in the bypass pipe serves as a heat source and is communicated with an external device through a hot water outlet to recover waste heat, and the medium cooled after waste heat utilization returns to a primary-side pipe.” However, regarding claim 6, the updated prior art does not teach or suggest, in combination with the rest of the limitation of claim 6, “… recycling the cooling liquid from the loop to the water tank with one or more pumps when the loop becomes an open circuit; and reading by a water-level sensing unit a water level of the water tank, and determining that the cooling liquid does not incur any substantial loss otherwise caused by the open circuit when the water level of the water tank reaches a predetermined position.” Claims 7-10 would also be allowed due to their dependence on claim 6. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. US 8699660 B2; Joshi; Ashutosh et al. is a Liquid cooled thermal control system for an imaging detector. US 20220377943 A1; CHEN; Chao-Jung et al. is a closed-loop liquid cooling system. US 20240349449 A1; SUN; Minghui et al. is a containerized single-phase liquid immersion cooling system. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARL F.R. TCHATCHOUANG whose telephone number is (571)272-3991. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00am -5:00am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Huy Phan can be reached at 571-272-7924. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARL F.R. TCHATCHOUANG/Examiner, Art Unit 2858 /HUY Q PHAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 05, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769903
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO DETERMINE SOLAR PRODUCTION
3y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12754146
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL ASSESSMENT METHOD AND SYSTEMS
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12736587
BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING A HEALTH OF A POWER SOURCE BASED ON DRIVING EVENTS
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12716797
CRYPTOGRAPHIC TRANSDUCER CALIBRATION SYSTEM FOR HOSE ASSEMBLY TEST BENCHES
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12704481
Fault State Detection Apparatus
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.1%)
2y 6m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 184 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month