Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/969,647

ELECTRONIC STETHOSCOPE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 05, 2024
Priority
Dec 05, 2023 — FR 2313606
Examiner
OJO, OYESOLA C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Withings
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
604 granted / 732 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
745
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
91.6%
+51.6% vs TC avg
§102
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 732 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-14 are rejected Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jha et al (US PUB 20230142937, hereinafter Jha). Regarding Claim 1, Jha discloses a portable physiological measuring device holdable by a user (e.g. an electronic stethoscope 10 having a holdable handle 21), (see at least the abstract and figure 1), comprising: a housing (e.g. a housing 20) of elongated shape along an extension direction and comprising an end (e.g. an anterior end defining a head 22), (see figure 1), an electronic stethoscope (e.g. a chest portion 24) positioned at the end and comprising a membrane (e.g. a diaphragm 23) extending in a membrane plane (see figures 2 and 3), a display (e.g. a display screen 33) arranged on the housing (see figure 1), the display extending along the extension direction orthogonal to the membrane plane (see figure 1), a physical interface (e.g. control button 34), operably connected to the display and positioned on the housing along the extension direction (see Jha, [0030]-[0034], and figures 1-3). Jha does not explicitly teach that the positioning of the physical interface is between the display and the membrane. However, it would have been obvious to any person having an ordinary skill in the art to position the physical interface (button 34) between the display (33) and the membrane (23) on the housing if such an arrangement is so desired, since it has been held that mere rearrangement of elements of a device unpatentable, especially if such arrangement would not have modified the operation of the device (In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950)); (see MPEP 2144.04 VI C). Regarding Claim 2, Jha discloses the portable physiological measuring device of claim 1, wherein the display (33) is configured to display information readable from a direction transverse to the extension direction (a user can read information from the display 33 from direction traverse to the extension direction), (see Jha, figure 1). Regarding Claim 3, Jha discloses the portable physiological measuring device of claim 1, wherein the end defines an edge (e.g. a rim 29) and wherein the membrane (23) is inscribed in the edge at the end (see Jha, [0033] and figure 2). Regarding Claim 4, Jha discloses the portable physiological measuring device of claim 1, wherein the membrane plane extends orthogonally to the extension direction (see Jha, figure 2). Regarding Claim 5, Jha discloses the portable physiological measuring device of claim 1, comprising a front face (e.g. top face) and wherein the display (33) and the physical interface (34) are positioned on the front face (see Jha, figure 2). Regarding Claim 6, Jha discloses the portable physiological measuring device according of claim 1, wherein the end defines an edge (29), the physical interface (34) being positioned between the edge and half or a third of an entire length of the device along the extension direction from the edge (see Jha, figure 1). Regarding Claim 7, Jha discloses the portable physiological measuring device according of claim 1, wherein the end is a second end (anterior end) and the housing (20) comprises a first end (e.g. a posterior end) opposite the second end along the extension direction (see figure 1), the device comprising an essentially parallelepiped shape with a front face (top face) and a rear face (bottom face) between the first end and the second end, wherein the display (33) and the physical interface (34) are positioned on the front face (see Jha, [0031], and figure 1). Regarding Claim 8, Jha discloses the physiological measuring device according of claim 1, wherein the end is a second end and the housing comprises a first end opposite the second end along the extension direction, the device further comprises an end sensor (e.g. a sensor chip 43) disposed at the first end (see Jha, [0036], and figure 5). Regarding Claim 9, Jha discloses the portable physiological measuring device of claim 1, wherein the end sensor is a thermometer e.g. the stethoscope 10 has sensor that measures body temperature of the patient), (see Jha, [0053], and figure 1). Regarding Claim 10, Jha discloses the portable physiological measuring device of claim 1, wherein the display is configured to display one or more indications relating to the placement of the stethoscope on the body (see Jha, [0033], [0047], and [0055], also figures 1 and 5). Regarding Claim 11, Jha discloses the portable physiological measuring device of claim 1, but does not explicitly disclose wherein the device has a volume of less than 20x5x10 cm. However, it would have been obvious to any person having an ordinary skill in the art to configure the device to have a volume of less than 20x5x10 cm if such dimension is desirable, since it has been held that "[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation." In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955)); (see MPEP 2144.05 II A). Claims 12 and 13 are rejected as Claim 11. Regarding Claim 14, Jha discloses a method of operating the physiological measuring device of claim 1 comprising: operating the physical interface (34) of the device in a one-handed manipulation navigation position, measuring with the stethoscope in a one-handed manipulation position (e.g. the handle 21 of the electronic stethoscope 10 is configured to be held by user when measuring body sounds, the control button 34 on the handle is used to control the device during use, and the results are displayed on the display screen 33), (see Jha, [0031], [0033], [0047], also figures 1 and 5). Conclusion The prior art made of record provided o PTO 892 and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OYESOLA C OJO whose telephone number is (571)272-0848. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 8:00am to 4:00pm Central Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivian Chin can be reached at 571-272-7840. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OYESOLA C OJO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2695
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678089
SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677091
Display Module and Display Apparatus
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671927
Systems and Methods for Powering Communication Devices
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671947
HYBRID SOUND RADIATION DEVICE FOR VIBRATING A HEAVY-WEIGHT RIGID PLATE AT AUDIO FREQUENCIES
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666187
MAGNETIC EAR TIP ATTACHMENT WITH POLARITY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.1%)
2y 1m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 732 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month