Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/969,662

INTERACTIVE QUERY SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Dec 05, 2024
Examiner
BULLOCK, JOSHUA
Art Unit
2153
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
522 granted / 634 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
662
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§103
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§102
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 634 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because the claims lack the necessary physical articles or objects to constitute a machine or a manufacture within the meaning of 35 USC 101. They are clearly not a series of steps or acts to be a process nor are they a combination of chemical compounds to be a composition of matter. As such, they fail to fall within a statutory category. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable over Wu et al. (US Pub. No. 2018/0189857 A1). In respect to Claim 1, Wu teaches: a query system comprising: a provider system in communication with a user device over a network, the user device having one or more input systems and one or more output systems, (Wu teaches [0032] a user device with input and output.) the provider system configured to generate an interactive query interface, (Wu teaches [0018] a query interface.) the provider system receiving query input captured via the one or more input systems through interaction of a user with the interactive query interface, the provider system receiving user data from the user device; (Wu teaches [0018, 0027] reception of a query input from a user device.) a natural language processing system configured to generate a query based on the query input, the query associated with at least one of a product or a service; (Wu teaches [0004] natural language processing of a query.) and a recommendation system having a machine learning model, (Wu teaches [0020-0021] recommendations with a machine learning model.) the recommendation system configured to generate a recommendation based on the user data and the query using the machine learning model, the provider system configured to send the recommendation to the user device to cause the recommendation to be presented with the interactive query interface using the one or more output system (Wu teaches [0004, 0021] providing recommendations associated with a query.) As per Claim 2, Wu teaches: wherein the interactive query interface includes an onboarding user interface configured to capture the user data (Wu teaches [0061] capturing data.) As per Claim 3, Wu teaches: wherein the interactive query interface is configured to capture a user selection using the one or more input systems, the user selection indicating at least one of the product or the service a user desires to purchase (Wu teaches [0036, 0061] capturing data for purchase.) As per Claim 4, Wu teaches: wherein the interactive query interface includes at least one of a plurality of selectable products or services, a price change compared to a current product or service, an input for an additional inquiry, a recommended additional product or service, a statement from a virtual employee, an explanation of at least one of the product or the service, a comparison with a product or a service used by users with similar characteristics, or an indication that a user selection is below a recommendation (Wu teaches [0036, 0061] capturing data for purchase.) As per Claim 5, Wu teaches: wherein the user data includes at least one of a name of a user, an address of the user, a birthdate of the user, or a desired coverage level (Wu teaches [0004, 0035] utilizing a user profile.) As per Claim 6, Wu teaches: wherein the one or more input systems and the one or more output systems are integrated into the user device (Wu [FIG. 1]) As per Claim 7, Wu teaches: wherein the recommendation is processed by natural language processing system before being sent to the user device (Wu [0004]) Claims 8-12 are the method claims corresponding to system claims 1-5 respectively, therefore are rejected for the same reasons noted above. As per Claim 13, Wu teaches: wherein the machine learning model is trained using historical conversational data relating to the at least one of the product or the service (Wu [0016]) As per Claim 14, Wu teaches: wherein the one or more output systems form a part of a user device (Wu [FIG. 1]) Claims 15-16 are the media claims corresponding to system claims 1 & 4 respectively, therefore are rejected for the same reasons noted above. As per Claim 17, Wu teaches: wherein the machine learning model is trained using historical conversational data relating to the at least one of selling or explaining products or services to consumers (Wu [0016]) Claims 18-19 are the media claims corresponding to system claims 6 & 5 respectively, therefore are rejected for the same reasons noted above. As per Claim 20, Wu teaches: generating an onboarding user interface in response to receiving the query; and causing the interactive query interface to present the onboarding user interface, wherein the user data is captured using the onboarding user interface (Wu teaches [0061] capturing data.) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA BULLOCK whose telephone number is (571)270-1395. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kavita Stanley can be reached at 571-272-8352. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA BULLOCK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2153 February 7, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 05, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602401
NON-DISRUPTIVE TRANSITION TO SYNCHRONOUS REPLICATION STATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585987
REMOTE STATISTICAL GENERATION OF GRAPHS FOR GRAPH MACHINE LEARNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12561289
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND USING SHARED NATURAL LANGUAGE LIBRARIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561294
SOFTWARE QUALITY TICKET ENRICHMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561291
METHOD OF CLOUD STORAGE FILE SYNCHRONIZATION PRIORITIZATION FOR SELECTED USERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.5%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 634 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month